Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a feasible treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, meta-analytic evidence is heterogenous and data from multicentre trials are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of tDCS versus sham stimulation as an additional treatment to a stable dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in adults with MDD. METHODS: The DepressionDC trial was triple-blind, randomised, and sham-controlled and conducted at eight hospitals in Germany. Patients being treated at a participating hospital aged 18-65 years were eligible if they had a diagnosis of MDD, a score of at least 15 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (21-item version), no response to at least one antidepressant trial in their current depressive episode, and treatment with an SSRI at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before inclusion; the SSRI was continued at the same dose during stimulation. Patients were allocated (1:1) by fixed-blocked randomisation to receive either 30 min of 2 mA bifrontal tDCS every weekday for 4 weeks, then two tDCS sessions per week for 2 weeks, or sham stimulation at the same intervals. Randomisation was stratified by site and baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score (ie, <31 or ≥31). Participants, raters, and operators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change on the MADRS at week 6, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one treatment session. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02530164). FINDINGS: Between Jan 19, 2016, and June 15, 2020, 3601 individuals were assessed for eligibility. 160 patients were included and randomly assigned to receive either active tDCS (n=83) or sham tDCS (n=77). Six patients withdrew consent and four patients were found to have been wrongly included, so data from 150 patients were analysed (89 [59%] were female and 61 [41%] were male). No intergroup difference was found in mean improvement on the MADRS at week 6 between the active tDCS group (n=77; -8·2, SD 7·2) and the sham tDCS group (n=73; -8·0, 9·3; difference 0·3 [95% CI -2·4 to 2·9]). Significantly more participants had one or more mild adverse events in the active tDCS group (50 [60%] of 83) than in the sham tDCS group (33 [43%] of 77; p=0·028). INTERPRETATION: Active tDCS was not superior to sham stimulation during a 6-week period. Our trial does not support the efficacy of tDCS as an additional treatment to SSRIs in adults with MDD. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Depression during Pregnancy: Results from an Open-Label Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is the most common morbidity during pregnancy. Available first-line therapy options are limited and depressive disorders in pregnant women are often untreated, leading to negative effects on maternal and fetal health. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this open-label pilot study is to extend evidence on the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment of antenatal depression and to point out options for the use of tDCS in this population. METHODS: Six drug-free female patients with major depressive disorder during pregnancy (later than 10th gestational week) were included in this pilot study. Patients were treated with twice-daily tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, anode: F3, cathode: F4) over ten days during inpatient stay (Phase 1) and with once-daily tDCS over 10 days during an optional outpatient stay (Phase 2). Clinical (HAMD-21, BDI) and neuropsychological ratings (Trail Making Test A/B) were performed at baseline, after two and four weeks as well as an obstetric examination. RESULTS: Six right-handed females (23-43 years, 12-33. gestational week) completed Phase 1; four patients additionally joined in Phase 2. tDCS was well tolerated and no adverse effects occurred. Clinical ratings showed an improvement of mean baseline HAMD-21 from 22.50 ± 7.56 to 13.67 ± 3.93 after week 2, and to 8.75 ± 4.99 after week 4. The mean baseline BDI was 26.00 ± 13.90 and declined to 11.17 ± 5.46 after week 2, and to 9.25 ± 3.30 after week 4. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant changes in HAMD-21 and BDI were observed after Phase 1. One patient achieved remission in terms of HAMD in Phase 1. Although this small-scale study lacks sham control, it shows clinical improvement and absence of adverse events in this critical population.

C-C chemokine receptor type 2 mediates glomerular injury and interstitial fibrosis in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis are hallmarks of chronic kidney injury leading to end-stage renal disease. Inflammatory mechanisms contribute to glomerular and interstitial scarring, including chemokine-mediated recruitment of leucocytes. In particular, accumulation of C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)-expressing macrophages promotes renal injury and fibrotic remodelling in diseases like glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. The functional role of CCR2 in the initiation and progression of primary glomerulosclerosis induced by podocyte injury remains to be characterized. METHODS: We analysed glomerular expression of CCR2 and its chemokine ligand C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) in human focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Additionally, CCL2 expression was determined in stimulated murine glomeruli and glomerular cells in vitro. To explore pro-inflammatory and profibrotic functions of CCR2 we induced adriamycin nephropathy, a murine model of FSGS, in BALB/c wild-type and Ccr2-deficient mice. RESULTS: Glomerular expression of CCR2 and CCL2 significantly increased in human FSGS. In adriamycin-induced FSGS, progressive glomerular scarring and reduced glomerular nephrin expression was paralleled by induced glomerular expression of CCL2. Adriamycin exposure stimulated secretion of CCL2 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) in isolated glomeruli and mesangial cells and CCL2 in parietal epithelial cells. In addition, TNF induced CCL2 expression in all glomerular cell populations, most prominently in podocytes. In vivo, Ccr2-deficient mice with adriamycin nephropathy showed reduced injury, macrophage and fibrocyte infiltration and inflammation in glomeruli and the tubulointerstitium. Importantly, glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis were significantly ameliorated. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that CCR2 is an important mediator of glomerular injury and progression of FSGS. CCR2- targeting therapies may represent a novel approach for its treatment.

[Increased Clozapine Levels During Infection: more Frequent than Assumed?] / Anstieg des Clozapinspiegels bei bronchopulmonalen Infekten: Häufiger als man denkt!

Systemic infections are known to alter the metabolism of various drugs via inhibition of the cytochrome P450 family. Here, we report the cases of two patients with schizophrenic psychosis and highly elevated clozapine levels during pulmonary systemic infection, however without experiencing side effects. After antibiotic treatment and temporary reduction of clozapine dosage blood levels of clozapine normalized within a few days. These cases show that clozapine levels may be highly elevated without necessarily causing side effects and that intensified pharmacovigilance should be considered by the clinician in patients with systemic infections.

[Evaluation of therapy outcome on a psychiatric admission ward. Background, methods and first results of a project on quality management]. / Evaluation der Behandlungsergebnisse einer psychiatrischen Aufnahmestation. Ziele, Methodik und erste Ergebnisse eines Projektes zur Qualitätssicherung.

BACKGROUND: Quality management is an important management tool in modern health care systems. This applies also to the mental health care system, where in the past decade many concepts have been developed on how to implement quality management appropriately and successfully. However, for the German speaking countries there are only very few studies on the evaluation of therapy outcome in psychiatric inpatient populations available, furthermore they deal primarily with diagnostic subgroups. The aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the quality of therapy on regular psychiatric admission wards. An important aspect was to include all diagnostic subgroups of a psychiatric inpatient population. METHODS: In an explorative field study and by means of a specially designed evaluation method, therapy courses of a psychiatric inpatient population were assessed. Indicators of therapy outcome were: psychopathology, level of psychosocial functioning, motivation of the patient for therapy, suicide attempts, legal status of the patient, patient violence and coercive treatment of the patient. The following assessment and rating scales were used: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and the Symptom-Checklist SCL-9. RESULTS: Changes in the courses of therapy of a psychiatric inpatient population in all diagnostic subgroups in the dimensions psychopathology and level of social functioning could be reproduced significantly using BPRS, HAMD and GAF scales. Difference values T(1)-T(2) were 6.6 +/- 6.9 (p = 0.019) in BPRS, 5.1 +/- 8.1 (p = 0.029) in HAMD and -5.5 +/- 10.1 (p = 0.028) in GAF. The entire battery of rating scales was successfully applied in 32% of all patients (drop out rate: 68%). In the subgroup of immigrant patients the entire battery of rating scales could be applied only in 17.4%, which accounts for a significantly higher drop out rate (82.6%; p = 0.067). DISCUSSION: Using the presented evaluation system therapy outcome and quality of therapy are easy to assess. The results of the quality assessment can be used in further therapeutic processes.