Cell-specific Dyt1 ∆GAG knock-in to basal ganglia and cerebellum reveal differential effects on motor behavior and sensorimotor network function.

Dystonia is a neurological movement disorder characterized by repetitive, unintentional movements and disabling postures that result from sustained or intermittent muscle contractions. The basal ganglia and cerebellum have received substantial focus in studying DYT1 dystonia. It remains unclear how cell-specific ∆GAG mutation of torsinA within specific cells of the basal ganglia or cerebellum affects motor performance, somatosensory network connectivity, and microstructure. In order to achieve this goal, we generated two genetically modified mouse models: in model 1 we performed Dyt1 ∆GAG conditional knock-in (KI) in neurons that express dopamine-2 receptors (D2-KI), and in model 2 we performed Dyt1 ∆GAG conditional KI in Purkinje cells of the cerebellum (Pcp2-KI). In both of these models, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess sensory-evoked brain activation and resting-state functional connectivity, and diffusion MRI to assess brain microstructure. We found that D2-KI mutant mice had motor deficits, abnormal sensory-evoked brain activation in the somatosensory cortex, as well as increased functional connectivity of the anterior medulla with cortex. In contrast, we found that Pcp2-KI mice had improved motor performance, reduced sensory-evoked brain activation in the striatum and midbrain, as well as reduced functional connectivity of the striatum with the anterior medulla. These findings suggest that (1) D2 cell-specific Dyt1 ∆GAG mediated torsinA dysfunction in the basal ganglia results in detrimental effects on the sensorimotor network and motor output, and (2) Purkinje cell-specific Dyt1 ∆GAG mediated torsinA dysfunction in the cerebellum results in compensatory changes in the sensorimotor network that protect against dystonia-like motor deficits.

Cell-specific effects of Dyt1 knock-out on sensory processing, network-level connectivity, and motor deficits.

DYT1 dystonia is a debilitating movement disorder characterized by repetitive, unintentional movements and postures. The disorder has been linked to mutation of the TOR1A/DYT1 gene encoding torsinA. Convergent evidence from studies in humans and animal models suggest that striatal medium spiny neurons and cholinergic neurons are important in DYT1 dystonia. What is not known is how torsinA dysfunction in these specific cell types contributes to the pathophysiology of DYT1 dystonia. In this study we sought to determine whether torsinA dysfunction in cholinergic neurons alone is sufficient to generate the sensorimotor dysfunction and brain changes associated with dystonia, or if torsinA dysfunction in a broader subset of cell types is needed. We generated two genetically modified mouse models, one with selective Dyt1 knock-out from dopamine-2 receptor expressing neurons (D2KO) and one where only cholinergic neurons are impacted (Ch2KO). We assessed motor deficits and performed in vivo 11.1 T functional MRI to assess sensory-evoked brain activation and connectivity, along with diffusion MRI to assess brain microstructure. We found that D2KO mice showed greater impairment than Ch2KO mice, including reduced sensory-evoked brain activity in key regions of the sensorimotor network, and altered functional connectivity of the striatum that correlated with motor deficits. These findings suggest that (1) the added impact of torsinA dysfunction in medium spiny and dopaminergic neurons of the basal ganglia generate more profound deficits than the dysfunction of cholinergic neurons alone, and (2) that sensory network impairments are linked to motor deficits in DYT1 dystonia.

Effects of ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation across multiple effectors in essential tremor.

OBJECTIVE: Essential tremor (ET) prominently affects the upper-limbs during voluntary movements, but can also affect the lower-limbs, head, and chin. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of thalamus improves both clinical ratings and quantitative measures of tremor, no study has quantified effects of DBS on tremor across multiple body parts. Our objective was to quantify therapeutic effects of DBS across multiple body parts in ET. METHODS: We performed quantitative assessment of tremor in ET patients who had DBS for at least one year. We assessed tremor on and off VIM-stimulation using triaxial accelerometers on the upper-limbs, lower-limbs, head and chin during seated and standing tasks. RESULTS: VIM-DBS significantly reduced tremor, but there was no statistical difference in degree of tremor reduction across the measured effectors. Compared to healthy controls, ET patients treated with DBS showed significantly greater tremor power (4-8 Hz) across all effectors during seated and standing tasks. CONCLUSIONS: VIM-DBS reduced tremor in ET patients. There was no significant difference in the degree of tremor reduction across the measured effectors. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new quantitative evidence that VIM-DBS is effective at reducing tremor across multiple parts of the body.

The neural circuitry of restricted repetitive behavior: Magnetic resonance imaging in neurodevelopmental disorders and animal models.

Restricted, repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are patterns of behavior that exhibit little variation in form and have no obvious function. RRBs although transdiagonstic are a particularly prominent feature of certain neurodevelopmental disorders, yet relatively little is known about the neural circuitry of RRBs. Past work in this area has focused on isolated brain regions and neurotransmitter systems, but implementing a neural circuit approach has the potential to greatly improve understanding of RRBs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well-suited to studying the structural and functional connectivity of the nervous system, and is a highly translational research tool. In this review, we synthesize MRI research from both neurodevelopmental disorders and relevant animal models that informs the neural circuitry of RRB. Together, these studies implicate distributed neural circuits between the cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum. Despite progress in neuroimaging of RRB, there are many opportunities for conceptual and methodological improvement. We conclude by suggesting future directions for MRI research in RRB, and how such studies can benefit from complementary approaches in neuroscience.