Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate: What do we tell prospective parents?

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/CP) is the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly and parents often ask, "how did this happen?" Patients and families may benefit from access to a multidisciplinary team (MDT) from prenatal diagnosis into early adulthood. Multiple factors can contribute to the development of a cleft. We discuss the epidemiology and risk factors that increase the likelihood of having a newborn with a cleft. The purpose of this article is to review the prenatal investigations involved in the diagnosis and workup of these patients in addition to postpartum treatment, prognostic factors, and counseling families regarding future recurrence risk.

Primary Unilateral Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty Technique: The Melbourne Technique.

Addressing the primary nasal deformity associated with congenital cleft lip is a complex problem that ranges in severity. There are both esthetic and functional ramifications that develop over time. This paper serves to describe the novel Melbourne technique in addressing the primary cleft nasal deformity through repositioning the septal cartilage to the facial midline, reconstructing the nasal floor, and an upper lateral suture to suspend and overcorrect the lower lateral cartilage by modifying the McComb technique. The definitive aim is long-term symmetry in the correction of the cleft lip nasal deformity and these techniques have demonstrated improved nasal symmetry in our unilateral cleft patients.

Prediction of Early Postoperative Pain in Infants Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of at risk patients before surgery could facilitate improved clinical communication, care pathways and postoperative pain management. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed in all infants who had undergone cleft palate repair. SETTING: Tertiary Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Infants < 36 months of age who underwent primary repair of cleft palate between March 2016 and July 2022. INTERVENTION: Requirement for analgesic intervention in the post operative care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse perioperative event defined as pain or distress. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of airway obstruction, hypoxemia or unplanned intensive care admission. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety one patients (14.6 months,10.1 kg weight) were included. Cleft distribution included submucous (5.2%), Veau I (23.4%), Veau 2 (38.1%), Veau 3 (24.4%), and Veau 4 (8.9%). Overall 35% of 291 infants undergoing cleft palate repair experienced pain or distress requiring opiate intervention in the first hour after surgery. Infants with a Veau 4 cleft palate had 1.8 times and Veau 2 cleft palate had 1.5 times the risk of postoperative pain compared to infants with Veau 1 cleft palate (relative risk 1.82, 95%CI 1.04-3.18 and 1.49, 95%CI 0.96-2.32 respectively). The use of bilateral above elbow arm splints was significantly associated with postoperative pain or distress (odds ratio 2.23, 95%CI 1.01-5.16). CONCLUSIONS: Post operative pain requiring intervention in PACU is common despite adequate intraoperative multimodal analgesia, local anaesthesia infiltration and postoperative opiate infusions. Infants undergoing soft palate alone or submucous palate repair may require less perioperative opiates.

Proximal Row Carpectomy Modifications for Capitate Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

Introduction Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a motion-sparing procedure for radiocarpal arthritis with reliable results. Traditionally, proximal capitate arthritis is a contraindication to PRC; however, PRC with modifications are proposed to circumvent this contraindication. PRC modifications can be broadly grouped into capitate resurfacing (CR) and capsular interposition (CI) procedures which could expand PRC indications. Our primary question was to characterize the outcomes achievable with various PRC modifications. Our secondary question was to determine which PRC modification was the optimal procedure when capitate arthritis was present. Methods A systematic review was conducted to examine the outcomes of modified PRC procedures. Independent reviewers appraised multiple databases for PRC studies with modifications for capitate arthritis in adult patients (age >18 years) with a minimum of three cases and extractable outcomes. Modified PRC procedures included capsular/allograft interposition, resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants, and osteochondral grafting. Pertinent outcomes included patient demographics, range-of-motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and complications, including salvage rates. Results Overall, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria-10 studies ( n = 147) on CI and 8 studies on CR ( n = 136). PRC with CI had the greatest flexion-extension arc and grip strength. Complications were marginally higher in the CR group (4%), while the CI group had a higher conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (10%). Conclusion Techniques to address capitate arthritis center around resurfacing or soft tissue interposition. PRC modifications with CI produces better range-of-motion and grip strength but higher conversion to total wrist arthrodesis. Higher conversion rates may be attributable to longer follow-up periods in studies examining CI compared with CR. Level of Evidence This is a Level III study.

Social communication features in children following moderate to severe acquired brain injury: a cross-sectional pilot study.

We compared the social communication deficits of children with moderate to severe acquired brain injury or autism spectrum disorder, while accounting for the role of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Parents of 20 children aged 6 to 10 years (10 acquired brain injury; 10 autism spectrum disorder) completed the Social Communication Questionnaire, and Conners 3 Parent Short. A multivariate analysis of covariance revealed significant differences between groups in Social Communication Questionnaire restricted repetitive behavior scores, but not reciprocal social interaction or social communication. Multiple linear regressions indicated diagnosis did not predict reciprocal social interaction or social communication scores and that Conners 3 Parent Short Form hyperactivity scores were the strongest predictor of Social Communication Questionnaire reciprocal social interaction scores after accounting for age and Intelligence Quotient. The lack of difference in social communication deficits between groups may help in understanding the pathophysiology underlying the behavioral consequences of acquired brain injury. The link between hyperactivity and reciprocal interaction suggests that targeting hyperactivity may improve social outcomes in children following acquired brain injury.