Methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness is dependent on Galphaq signaling.

Airway function in health and disease as well as in response to bronchospastic stimuli (i.e., irritants, allergens, and inflammatory mediators) is controlled, in part, by cholinergic muscarinic receptor regulation of smooth muscle. In particular, the dependence of airway smooth muscle contraction/relaxation on heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor signaling suggests that these events underlie the responses regulating airway function. Galphaq-containing G proteins are proposed to be a prominent signaling pathway, and the availability of knockout mice deficient of this subunit has allowed for an investigation of its potential role in airway function. Airway responses in Galphaq-deficient mice (activities assessed by both tracheal tension and in vivo lung function measurements) were attenuated relative to wild-type controls. Moreover, ovalbumin sensitization/aerosol challenge of Galphaq-deficient mice also failed to elicit an allergen-induced increase in airway reactivity to methacholine. These findings indicate that cholinergic receptor-mediated responses are dependent on Galphaq-mediated signaling events and identify Galphaq as a potential target of preventative/intervening therapies for lung dysfunction.

Absence of pressure overload induced myocardial hypertrophy after conditional inactivation of Galphaq/Galpha11 in cardiomyocytes.

Myocardial hypertrophy is an adaptational response of the heart to increased work load, but it is also associated with a high risk of cardiac mortality due to its established role in the development of cardiac failure, one of the leading causes of death in developed countries. Multiple growth factors and various downstream signaling pathways involving, for example, ras, gp-130 (ref. 4), JNK/p38 (refs. 5,6) and calcineurin/NFAT/CaM-kinase have been implicated in the hypertrophic response. However, there is evidence that the initial phase in the development of myocardial hypertrophy involves the formation of cardiac para- and/or autocrine factors like endothelin-1, norepinephrine or angiotensin II (refs. 7,8), the receptors of which are coupled to G-proteins of the Gq/11-, G12/13- and Gi/o-families. Cardiomyocyte-specific transgenic overexpression of alpha1-adrenergic or angiotensin (AT1)-receptors as well as of the Gq alpha-subunit, Galphaq, results in myocardial hypertrophy. These data demonstrate that chronic activation of the Gq/G11-family is sufficient to induce myocardial hypertrophy. In order to test whether Gq/G11 mediate the physiological hypertrophy response to pressure overload, we generated a mouse line lacking both Galphaq and Galpha11 in cardiomyocytes. These mice showed no detectable ventricular hypertrophy in response to pressure-overload induced by aortic constriction. The complete lack of a hypertrophic response proves that the Gq/G11-mediated pathway is essential for cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload and makes this signaling process an interesting target for interventions to prevent myocardial hypertrophy.

Polarized expression of G protein-coupled receptors and an all-or-none discharge of Ca2+ pools at initiation sites of [Ca2+]i waves in polarized exocrine cells.

In the present work we examined localization and behavior of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in polarized exocrine cells to address the questions of how luminal to basal Ca(2+) waves can be generated in a receptor-specific manner and whether quantal Ca(2+) release reflects partial release from a continuous pool or an all-or-none release from a compartmentalized pool. Immunolocalization revealed that expression of GPCRs in polarized cells is not uniform, with high levels of GPCR expression at or near the tight junctions. Measurement of phospholipase Cbeta activity and receptor-dependent recruitment and trapping of the box domain of RGS4 in GPCRs complexes indicated autonomous functioning of G(q)-coupled receptors in acinar cells. These findings explain the generation of receptor-specific Ca(2+) waves and why the waves are always initiated at the apical pole. The initiation site of Ca(2+) wave at the apical pole and the pattern of wave propagation were independent of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate concentration. Furthermore, a second Ca(2+) wave with the same initiation site and pattern was launched by inhibition of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase pumps of cells continuously stimulated with sub-maximal agonist concentration. By contrast, rapid sequential application of sub-maximal and maximal agonist concentrations to the same cell triggered Ca(2+) waves with different initiation sites. These findings indicate that signaling specificity in pancreatic acinar cells is aided by polarized expression and autonomous functioning of GPCRs and that quantal Ca(2+) release is not due to a partial Ca(2+) release from a continuous pool, but rather, it is due to an all-or-none Ca(2+) release from a compartmentalized Ca(2+) pool.

RGS18 is a myeloerythroid lineage-specific regulator of G-protein-signalling molecule highly expressed in megakaryocytes.

Myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis are controlled by haematopoietic growth factors, including cytokines, and chemokines that bind to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGSs) are a protein family that can act as GTPase-activating proteins for G(alphai)- and G(alphaq)-class proteins. We have identified a new member of the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins, RGS18. RGS18 contains clusters of hydrophobic and basic residues, which are characteristic of an amphipathic helix within its first 33 amino acids. RGS18 mRNA was most highly abundant in megakaryocytes, and was also detected specifically in haematopoietic progenitor and myeloerythroid lineage cells. RGS18 mRNA was not detected in cells of the lymphoid lineage. RGS18 was also highly expressed in mouse embryonic 15-day livers, livers being the principal organ for haematopoiesis at this stage of fetal development. RGS1, RGS2 and RGS16, other members of the R4 subfamily, were expressed in distinct progenitor and mature myeloerythroid and lymphoid lineage blood cells. RGS18 was shown to interact specifically with the G(alphai-3) subunit in membranes from K562 cells. Furthermore, overexpression of RGS18 inhibited mitogen-activated-protein kinase activation in HEK-293/chemokine receptor 2 cells treated with monocyte chemotactic protein-1. In yeast cells, RGS18 overexpression complemented a pheromone-sensitive phenotype caused by mutations in the endogeneous yeast RGS gene, SST2. These data demonstrated that RGS18 was expressed most highly in megakaryocytes, and can modulate GPCR pathways in both mammalian and yeast cells in vitro. Hence RGS18 might have an important role in the regulation of megakaryocyte differentiation and chemotaxis.

RGS proteins provide biochemical control of agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations.

Agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations have been considered a biophysical phenomenon reflecting the regulation of the IP3 receptor by [Ca2+]i. Here we show that [Ca2+]i oscillations are a biochemical phenomenon emanating from regulation of Ca2+ signaling by the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by G protein-coupled receptors require the action of RGS proteins. Inhibition of endogenous RGS protein action disrupted agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations by a stepwise conversion to a sustained response. Based on these findings and the effect of mutant RGS proteins and anti-RGS protein antibodies on Ca2+ signaling, we propose that RGS proteins within the G protein-coupled receptor complexes provide a biochemical control of [Ca2+]i oscillations.

Determination of the contact energies between a regulator of G protein signaling and G protein subunits and phospholipase C beta 1.

Cell signaling proteins may form functional complexes that are capable of rapid signal turnover. These contacts may be stabilized by either scaffolding proteins or multiple interactions between members of the complex. In this study, we have determined the affinities between a regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, and three members of the G protein-phospholipase Cbeta (PLC-beta) signaling cascade which may allow for rapid deactivation of intracellular Ca(2+) release and activation of protein kinase C. Specifically, using fluorescence methods, we have determined the interaction energies between the RGS4, PLC-beta, G-betagamma, and both deactivated (GDP-bound) and activated (GTPgammaS-bound) Galpha(q). We find that RGS4 not only binds to activated Galpha(q), as predicted, but also to Gbetagamma and PLCbeta(1). These interactions occur through protein-protein contacts since the intrinsic membrane affinity of RGS4 was found to be very weak in the absence of the protein partner PLCbeta(1) or a lipid regulator, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5 trisphosphate. Ternary complexes between Galpha(q), Gbetagamma and phospholipase Cbeta(1) will form, but only at relatively high protein concentrations. We propose that these interactions allow RGS4 to remain anchored to the signaling complex even in the quiescent state and allow rapid transfer to activated Galpha(q) to shut down the signal. Comparison of the relative affinities between these interacting proteins will ultimately allow us to determine whether certain complexes can form and where signals will be directed.

G-protein signaling: satisfying the basic necessities of life.

Recent studies have shed light on the role of G-protein signaling, and in particular the regulatory RGS proteins, in behavioral adaptations of the round worm Caenorhabditis elegans; similar signaling pathways underlie analogous physiology and behaviors in mammals.

GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins.

GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) regulate heterotrimeric G proteins by increasing the rates at which their subunits hydrolyze bound GTP and thus return to the inactive state. G protein GAPs act allosterically on G subunits, in contrast to GAPs for the Ras-like monomeric GTP-binding proteins. Although they do not contribute directly to the chemistry of GTP hydrolysis, G protein GAPs can accelerate hydrolysis >2000-fold. G protein GAPs include both effector proteins (phospholipase C-¿, p115RhoGEF) and a growing family of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) that are found throughout the animal and fungal kingdoms. GAP activity can sharpen the termination of a signal upon removal of stimulus, attenuate a signal either as a feedback inhibitor or in response to a second input, promote regulatory association of other proteins, or redirect signaling within a G protein signaling network. GAPs are regulated by various controls of their cellular concentrations, by complex interactions with G¿ or with G¿5 through an endogenous G-like domain, and by interaction with multiple other proteins.

Ca2+/Calmodulin reverses phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate-dependent inhibition of regulators of G protein-signaling GTPase-activating protein activity.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G(i) and/or G(q) class G protein alpha subunits. RGS GAP activity is inhibited by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP(3)) but not by other lipid phosphoinositides or diacylglycerol. Both the negatively charged head group and long chain fatty acids (C16) are required for binding and inhibition of GAP activity. Amino acid substitutions in helix 5 within the RGS domain of RGS4 reduce binding affinity and inhibition by PIP(3) but do not affect inhibition of GAP activity by palmitoylation. Conversely, the GAP activity of a palmitoylation-resistant mutant RGS4 is inhibited by PIP(3). Calmodulin binds all RGS proteins we tested in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner but does not directly affect GAP activity. Indeed, Ca(2+)/calmodulin binds a complex of RGS4 and a transition state analog of Galpha(i1)-GDP-AlF(4)(-). Ca(2+)/calmodulin reverses PIP(3)-mediated but not palmitoylation-mediated inhibition of GAP activity. Ca(2+)/calmodulin competition with PIP(3) may provide an intracellular mechanism for feedback regulation of Ca(2+) signaling evoked by G protein-coupled agonists.

Normal hematopoiesis and inflammatory responses despite discrete signaling defects in Galpha15 knockout mice.

Galpha15 activates phospholipase Cbeta in response to the greatest variety of agonist-stimulated heptahelical receptors among the four Gq class G-protein alpha subunits expressed in mammals. Galpha15 is primarily expressed in hematopoietic cells in fetal and adult mice. We disrupted the Galpha15 gene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells to identify its biological functions. Surprisingly, hematopoiesis was normal in Galpha15(-/-) mice, Galpha15(-/-) Galphaq(-/-) double-knockout mice (which express only Galpha11 in most hematopoietic cells), and Galpha11(-/-) mice, suggesting functional redundancy in Gq class signaling. Inflammatory challenges, including thioglycolate-induced peritonitis and infection with Trichinella spiralis, stimulated similar responses in Galpha15(-/-) adults and wild-type siblings. Agonist-stimulated Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores was assayed to identify signaling defects in primary cultures of thioglycolate-elicited macrophages isolated from Galpha15(-/-) mice. C5a-stimulated phosphoinositide accumulation and Ca(2+) release was significantly reduced in Galpha15(-/-) macrophages. Ca(2+) signaling was abolished only in mutant cells pretreated with pertussis toxin, suggesting that the C5a receptor couples to both Galpha15 and Galphai in vivo. Signaling evoked by other receptors coupled by Gq class alpha subunits appeared normal in Galpha15(-/-) macrophages. Despite discrete signaling defects, compensation by coexpressed Gq and/or Gi class alpha subunits may suppress abnormalities in Galpha15-deficient mice.

Regulators of G-protein signaling in receptor complexes.

G protein signaling pathways regulate heart development and adult cardiac function. G protein activity is controlled by the interplay between receptor-catalyzed activation and the inhibitory regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. Most RGS proteins are GTPase accelerating proteins (GAPs) for Gi and Gq class G protein alpha subunits, and thereby terminate signaling. However, RGS proteins also provide scaffolding properties to help assemble or maintain signaling complexes. Thus, RGS proteins are kinetic regulators that may sharpen both signal activation and termination. The five subfamilies of mammalian RGS proteins contain a characteristic RGS domain and distinct flanking domains that convey lipid and/or protein interactions within receptor complexes. The RGS domain provides GAP activity and additional interactions with the receptor complex. Distantly related RGS-like (RGL) proteins provide other regulatory and effector functions in G protein signaling pathways. RGS and RGL proteins provide exciting new therapeutic targets to combat cardiovascular diseases.

G proteins, chemosensory perception, and the C. elegans genome project: An attractive story.

Heterotrimeric G proteins, consisting of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits, couple ligand-bound seven transmembrane domain receptors to the regulation of effector proteins and production of intracellular second messengers. G protein signaling mediates the perception of environmental cues in all higher eukaryotic organisms, including yeast, Dictyostelium, plants, and animals. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is the first animal to have complete descriptions of its cellular anatomy, cell lineage, neuronal wiring diagram, and genomic sequence. In a recent paper, Jansen et al. used sequence searches of the C. elegans genome database to identify all heterotrimeric G protein genes (20 Galpha, 2 Gbeta, 2 Ggamma). C. elegans encodes one ortholog of each of the four Galpha classes found in metazoans and 16 new Galpha genes. The orthologous genes are widely expressed, whereas 14 of the divergent Galpha genes are almost exclusively expressed in sensory neurons where they may regulate perception and chemotaxis.

Alternate coupling of receptors to Gs and Gi in pancreatic and submandibular gland cells.

Many Gs-coupled receptors can activate both cAMP and Ca2+ signaling pathways. Three mechanisms for dual activation have been proposed. One is receptor coupling to both Gs and G15 (a Gq class heterotrimeric G protein) to initiate independent signaling cascades that elevate intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca+2, respectively. The other two mechanisms involve cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated activation of phospholipase Cbeta either directly or by switching receptor coupling from Gs to Gi. These mechanisms were primarily inferred from studies with transfected cell lines. In native cells we found that two Gs-coupled receptors (the vasoactive intestinal peptide and beta-adrenergic receptors) in pancreatic acinar and submandibular gland duct cells, respectively, evoke a Ca2+ signal by a mechanism involving both Gs and Gi. This inference was based on the inhibitory action of antibodies specific for Galphas, Galphai, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, pertussis toxin, RGS4, a fragment of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and inhibitors of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. By contrast, Ca2+ signaling evoked by Gs-coupled receptor agonists was not blocked by Gq class-specific antibodies and was unaffected in Galpha15 -/- knockout mice. We conclude that sequential activation of Gs and Gi, mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, may represent a general mechanism in native cells for dual stimulation of signaling pathways by Gs-coupled receptors.

Differential involvement of Galpha12 and Galpha13 in receptor-mediated stress fiber formation.

The ubiquitously expressed heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) G12 and G13 have been shown to activate the small GTPase Rho. Rho stimulation leads to a rapid remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and subsequent stress fiber formation. We investigated the involvement of G12 or G13 in stress fiber formation induced through a variety of Gq/G11-coupled receptors. Using fibroblast cell lines derived from wild-type and Galphaq/Galpha11-deficient mice, we show that agonist-dependent activation of the endogenous receptors for thrombin or lysophosphatidic acid and of the heterologously expressed bradykinin B2, vasopressin V1A, endothelin ETA, and serotonin 5-HT2C receptors induced stress fiber formation in either the presence or absence of Galphaq/Galpha11. Stress fiber assembly induced through the muscarinic M1 and the metabotropic glutamate subtype 1alpha receptors was dependent on Gq/G11 proteins. The activation of the Gq/G11-coupled endothelin ETB and angiotensin AT1A receptors failed to induce stress fiber formation. Lysophosphatidic acid, B2, and 5-HT2C receptor-mediated stress fiber formation was dependent on Galpha13 and involved epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, whereas thrombin, ETA, and V1A receptors induced stress fiber accumulation via Galpha12 in an EGF receptor-independent manner. Our data demonstrate that many Gq/G11-coupled receptors induce stress fiber assembly in the absence of Galphaq and Galpha11 and that this involves either a Galpha12 or a Galpha13/EGF receptor-mediated pathway.

Overexpression of G11alpha and isoforms of phospholipase C in islet beta-cells reveals a lack of correlation between inositol phosphate accumulation and insulin secretion.

It has been suggested that insulin secretion from pancreatic islets may be mediated in part by activation of phospholipases C (PLCs) and phosphoinositide hydrolysis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the relatively modest fuel-stimulated insulin secretion responses of rodent beta-cell lines might be explained by inadequate expression or activation of PLC isoforms. We have found that two insulinoma cell lines, INS-1 and betaG 40/110, completely lack PLC-delta1 expression but have levels of expression of PLC-beta1, -beta2, -beta3, -delta2, and -gamma1 that are similar to or slightly reduced from those found in fresh rat islets. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of PLC-delta1, -beta1, or -beta3 in INS-1 or betaG 40/110 cells results in little or no enhancement in inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation and no improvement in insulin secretion when the cells are stimulated with glucose or carbachol, despite the fact that the overexpressed proteins are fully active in cell extracts. Overexpression of PLC-beta1 or -beta3 in normal rat islets elicits a larger increase in IP accumulation but, again, has no effect on insulin secretion. Because the effect of carbachol on insulin secretion is thought to be mediated through muscarinic receptors that link to the Gq/11 class of heterotrimeric G proteins, we also overexpressed G11alpha in INS-1 cells, either alone or in concert with overexpression of PLC-beta1 or -beta3. Overexpression of G11alpha enhances IP accumulation, an effect slightly potentiated by co-overexpression of PLC-beta1 or -beta3, but these maneuvers do not affect glucose or carbachol-stimulated insulin secretion. In sum, our studies show a lack of correlation between IP accumulation and insulin secretion in INS-1 cells, betaG 40/110 cells, or cultured rat islets. We conclude that overexpression of PLC isoforms and/or G11alpha is not an effective means of enhancing fuel responsiveness in the insulinoma cell lines studied.

RGS proteins determine signaling specificity of Gq-coupled receptors.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Galpha subunits, thereby attenuating signaling. RGS4 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gi and Gq class alpha subunits. In the present study, we used knockouts of Gq class genes in mice to evaluate the potency and selectivity of RGS4 in modulating Ca2+ signaling transduced by different Gq-coupled receptors. RGS4 inhibited phospholipase C activity and Ca2+ signaling in a receptor-selective manner in both permeabilized cells and cells dialyzed with RGS4 through a patch pipette. Receptor-dependent inhibition of Ca2+ signaling by RGS4 was observed in acini prepared from the rat and mouse pancreas. The response of mouse pancreatic acini to carbachol was about 4- and 33-fold more sensitive to RGS4 than that of bombesin and cholecystokinin (CCK), respectively. RGS1 and RGS16 were also potent inhibitors of Gq-dependent Ca2+ signaling and acted in a receptor-selective manner. RGS1 showed approximately 1000-fold higher potency in inhibiting carbachol than CCK-dependent signaling. RGS16 was as effective as RGS1 in inhibiting carbachol-dependent signaling but only partially inhibited the response to CCK. By contrast, RGS2 inhibited the response to carbachol and CCK with equal potency. The same pattern of receptor-selective inhibition by RGS4 was observed in acinar cells from wild type and several single and double Gq class knockout mice. Thus, these receptors appear to couple Gq class alpha subunit isotypes equally. Difference in receptor selectivity of RGS proteins action indicates that regulatory specificity is conferred by interaction of RGS proteins with receptor complexes.

G protein-dependent Ca2+ signaling complexes in polarized cells.

Polarized cells signal in a polarized manner. This is exemplified in the patterns of [Ca2+]i waves and [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors in these cells. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling complexes in cellular microdomains, with the aid of scaffolding proteins, is likely to have a major role in shaping G protein-coupled [Ca2+]i signal pathways. In epithelial cells, these domains coincide with sites of [Ca2+]i-wave initiation and local [Ca2+]i oscillations. Cellular microdomains enriched with Ca(2+)-signaling proteins have been found in several cell types. Microdomains organize communication between Ca(2+)-signaling proteins in the plasma membrane and internal Ca2+ stores in the endoplasmic reticulum through the interaction between the IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum and Ca(2+)-influx channels in the plasma membrane. Ca2+ signaling appears to be controlled within the receptor complex by the regulators of G protein-signaling (RGS) proteins. Three domains in RGS4 and related RGS proteins contribute important regulatory features. The RGS domain accelerates GTP hydrolysis on the G alpha subunit to uncouple receptor stimulation from IP3 production; the C-terminus may mediate interaction with accessory proteins in the complex; and the N-terminus acts in a receptor-selective manner to confer regulatory specificity. Hence, RGS proteins have both catalytic and scaffolding function in Ca2+ signaling. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling proteins into complexes within microdomains is likely to play a prominent role in the localized control of [Ca2+]i and in [Ca2+]i oscillations.

The N-terminal domain of RGS4 confers receptor-selective inhibition of G protein signaling.

Regulators of heterotrimeric G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Gq and Gi alpha subunits, thus attenuating signaling. Mechanisms that provide more precise regulatory specificity have been elusive. We report here that an N-terminal domain of RGS4 discriminated among receptor signaling complexes coupled via Gq. Accordingly, deletion of the N-terminal domain of RGS4 eliminated receptor selectivity and reduced potency by 10(4)-fold. Receptor selectivity and potency of inhibition were partially restored when the RGS4 box was added together with an N-terminal peptide. In vitro reconstitution experiments also indicated that sequences flanking the RGS4 box were essential for high potency GAP activity. Thus, RGS4 regulates Gq class signaling by the combined action of two domains: 1) the RGS box accelerates GTP hydrolysis by Galphaq and 2) the N terminus conveys high affinity and receptor-selective inhibition. These activities are each required for receptor selectivity and high potency inhibition of receptor-coupled Gq signaling.

Promiscuous coupling of receptors to Gq class alpha subunits and effector proteins in pancreatic and submandibular gland cells.

Mice with deficiencies in one or more Gq class alpha subunit genes were used to examine the role of the alpha subunit in regulating Ca2+ signaling in pancreatic and submandibular gland cells. Western blot analysis showed that these cells express three of the four Gq class subunits, Galphaq, Galpha11, and Galpha14 but not Galpha15. Surprisingly, all parameters of Ca2+ signaling were identical in cells from wild type and four lines of mutant mice: 1) Galpha11-/-, 2) Galpha11-/-/Galpha14-/-, 3) Galpha14-/-/Galpha15-/-, and 4) Galphaq-/-/Galpha15-/-. These parameters included the Kapp for several Gq class coupled receptors, induction of [Ca2+]i oscillations by weak stimulation, and a biphasic [Ca2+]i response by strong stimulation. Furthermore, Ca2+ release from internal stores and Ca2+ entry were not affected in cells from any of the mutant mice. We conclude that Galphaq, Galpha11, and Galpha14 promiscuously couple several receptors (m3 muscarinic, bombesin, cholecystokinin, and alpha1 adrenergic) to effector proteins that activate both Ca2+ release from internal stores and Ca2+ entry.

Embryonic cardiomyocyte hypoplasia and craniofacial defects in G alpha q/G alpha 11-mutant mice.

Heterotrimeric G proteins of the Gq class have been implicated in signaling pathways regulating cardiac growth under physiological and pathological conditions. Knockout mice carrying inactivating mutations in both of the widely expressed G alpha q class genes, G alpha q and G alpha 11, demonstrate that at least two active alleles of these genes are required for extrauterine life. Mice carrying only one intact allele [G alpha q(-/+);G alpha 11(-/-) or G alpha q(-/-);G alpha 11(-/+)] died shortly after birth. These mutants showed a high incidence of cardiac malformation. In addition, G alpha q(-/-);G alpha 11(-/+) newborns suffered from craniofacial defects. Mice lacking both G alpha q and G alpha 11 [G alpha q(-/-);G alpha 11(-/-)] died at embryonic day 11 due to cardiomyocyte hypoplasia. These data demonstrate overlap in G alpha q and G alpha 11 gene functions and indicate that the Gq class of G proteins plays a crucial role in cardiac growth and development.