Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 26(1): 51-55, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29683888

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist directly comparing the likelihood of blood transfusion by route of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. In addition, limited evidence is available regarding the risk of not ordering preoperative type and screen (T&S) in apical POP surgery. The objectives of the study are to (1) provide baseline data regarding the current need for preoperative T&S by comparing perioperative blood transfusion rates between 3 routes of apical POP surgery and (2) determine the rate of a positive preoperative antibody screen in women who underwent apical POP surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent apical POP surgery by 3 different routes: abdominal (abdominal sacrocolpopexy), robotic (robotic sacrocolpopexy), or vaginal (uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament fixation). RESULTS: Among 610 women who underwent apical POP surgeries between May 2005 and May 2016, 24 women (3.9%) received a perioperative blood transfusion. The rate of transfusion was higher in the abdominal group (11.1%) compared with robotic (0.5%, P < 0.001) and vaginal (0.5%, P < 0.001). In a logistic regression model, abdominal route of POP surgery remained significantly associated with transfusion (odds ratio, 20.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-156.6). Among the 572 women who had a preoperative T&S performed, 9 (1.5%) had a positive antibody screen. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion was significantly more common in abdominal compared with robotic and vaginal apical POP surgeries. The rate of a positive antibody screen was low, suggesting that type O blood is low risk if cross-matched blood is not available. Thus, it may be reasonable to not order a preoperative T&S prior to robotic or vaginal apical POP surgery.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Aged , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data
2.
Minerva Ginecol ; 69(2): 171-177, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28001022

ABSTRACT

Understanding and applying the epidemiology and lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is necessary to provide quality care to a growing and aging female population. Both SUI and POP are prevalent medical conditions, affecting 15-17% and 3-6% of women respectively. While generally not life-threatening, they represent a significant public health burden as they are associated with a decreased quality of life and significant economic impact. Although treatment is considered elective, for many women, the decision to address SUI or POP is necessary in order to regain a normal lifestyle and the lifetime risk for undergoing surgery to address either stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse is 20.5%. This review includes a brief overview of the epidemiology of both disorders, followed by discussion of both landmark and recent literature regarding the lifetime risk of surgery for either disorder. Additionally, we will review re-operation rates, trends in management, and future care needs.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/epidemiology , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Quality of Life , Risk , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery
3.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 27(5): 380-4, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308198

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We sought to provide a review of the recent literature regarding the prevalence and epidemiological trends in pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence. We also examined the current trends in surgical treatment for these disorders and discuss future care needs. RECENT FINDINGS: Approximately, one quarter of all women suffer from at least one or more PFDs. Urinary incontinence represents the most common PFD with an estimated prevalence of 15-17%, whereas fecal incontinence affects, approximately, 9% of adult women. POP is more difficult to assess with prevalence estimates ranging from 3 to 8%. Surgery for PFDs is common as 20% of women undergo stress urinary incontinence or POP surgery over their lifetime. As the aging population grows, the number of women with PFDs will increase substantially and the demand for care for these disorders will continue to grow through the year 2050. SUMMARY: PFDs are a significant public health issue and they negatively impact the lives of millions of adult women. The projected increase in the number of women affected by PFDs over the next 40 years will create increased demand for providers properly trained in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery.


Subject(s)
Fecal Incontinence/epidemiology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Women's Health/standards , Fecal Incontinence/therapy , Female , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/therapy , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...