Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Res ; 55(3): 537-43, 1995 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7834622

ABSTRACT

The rat tracheal epithelial (RTE) cell focus inhibition assay was used to identify potential chemopreventive agents. Ninety-nine agents were evaluated for their ability to inhibit benzo[a]pyrene-induced transformation of RTE cells. Freshly isolated RTE cells were exposed to benzo[a]pyrene alone or in combination with a chemopreventive agent. After 30 days in culture, transformed foci were scored and inhibition was quantitated. In these studies, foci formation was inhibited mainly by agents which modulate the initiation of carcinogenesis by altering drug-metabolizing enzymes, inhibiting the binding of benzo[a]pyrene to DNA, enhancing detoxification of activated carcinogens, or by inducing epithelial cell differentiation. Such agents include antioxidants, free radical scavengers, glutathione S-transferase enhancers, vitamins, retinoids, and sulfhydryl compounds. Agents which inhibit ornithine decarboxylase and arachidonic acid metabolism were not as effective. The RTE assay provides important data for agent selection prior to whole animal-screening assays in the development of chemoprevention drugs.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/classification , Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacology , Benzo(a)pyrene/toxicity , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Arachidonic Acids/antagonists & inhibitors , Cells, Cultured , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Epithelium , Glutathione/metabolism , Histamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Ornithine Decarboxylase Inhibitors , Protein Kinase C/antagonists & inhibitors , Rats , Retinoids/pharmacology , Trachea/drug effects
2.
Cancer Res ; 50(7): 2068-74, 1990 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2138505

ABSTRACT

Twenty-eight compounds were screened for chemopreventive activity by using a rat tracheal epithelial cell transformation inhibition assay. In this new assay, chemicals were tested for their ability to inhibit the formation of transformed rat tracheal epithelial cell colonies which arise following exposure to the carcinogen benzo(a)pyrene. The 15 positive compounds were N-acetylcysteine, bismuththiol, calcium glucarate, (+/-) catechin, diallyl disulfide, glycaric acid, D-glucaro-1,4-lactone, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide, D-limonene, mesna, retinoic acid, rutin, quercetin, silymarin, and taurine. In examining the nature of compounds that inhibited rat tracheal epithelial cell transformation, several possible chemopreventive mechanisms appeared to be predominant: compounds that were positive (a) increased glutathione levels or enhanced conjugation; (b) increased cytochrome P-450 activity; (c) displayed nucleophilic activity; or (d) induced differentiation. Thirteen compounds were negative in the rat tracheal epithelial transformation inhibition assay: crocetin, difluoromethylornithine, ellagic acid, esculetin, enoxalone, ibuprofen, levamisole, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylate, piroxicam, sodium butyrate, D-alpha-tocopherol acetate, and polyethylene glycol 400. It was evident from these results that this assay would not detect compounds that were (a) anti-promoting in nature; (b) glutathione inhibitors; (c) differentiation inhibitors; (d) O6-methylguanine inhibitors; (e) organ specific; or (f) inactive. The rat tracheal epithelial cell transformation inhibition assay appeared to identify chemopreventive compounds that act at early stages of the carcinogenic process.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Animals , DNA Damage , Epithelium/pathology , Fenretinide , Glucaric Acid/pharmacology , In Vitro Techniques , Quercetin/pharmacology , Rats , Trachea/pathology , Tretinoin/analogs & derivatives , Tretinoin/pharmacology , Vitamin E/pharmacology
3.
Fundam Appl Toxicol ; 11(4): 673-84, 1988 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3229591

ABSTRACT

To evaluate two in vitro assays for their ability to detect known developmental toxicants and nontoxicants, a series of 44 coded compounds were assayed by two independent laboratories using standardized protocols. The two test systems were (1) the human embryonic palatal mesenchymal cell growth inhibition assay and (2) the mouse ovarian tumor cell attachment inhibition assay. After all compounds were tested, they were decoded and ranked according to the minimum IC50 value (the millimolar concentration of compound which inhibits growth or attachment by 50% compared to the solvent control) from either test. The in vitro test result concordance with established in vivo animal and human test results was examined over a wide range of concentration levels (above which the in vitro results were called positive and below which they were considered negative). A positive response from either test was defined as a positive in vitro response. Concordance was defined as the number of correct responses divided by the number of chemicals tested. At the 1 mM level, the concordance of data from the combined in vitro assays with the in vivo data was 66% in one laboratory and 58% in the other. The maximum agreement between the combined in vitro and in vivo data was reached at the 20 mM level, where there was a 73 and 74% concordance of results in the two laboratories. At that level there was a 16 and 10% incidence of false negative results, and a 54 and 77% incidence of false positive results. A portion of these false negative compounds may require metabolic activation. The use of either assay alone was not as accurate as using a positive result from either test. Agreement of the in vitro data at the 10 mM level with available human data was 71 and 75% for each laboratory. The data indicate that the two assays are complimentary and as such the combination of these assays could be useful as a preliminary screen to establish priorities for in vivo developmental toxicity testing.


Subject(s)
Cell Adhesion/drug effects , Teratogens/toxicity , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Mice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...