Displaced Proximal Tibia Fracture After Proximal Tibial Autograft Harvest: A Case Report.

Background: A 60-year-old female underwent proximal tibial autograft harvest for a Cotton osteotomy. Her postoperative course was complicated by psychogenic non-epileptic seizure (PNES) episodes leading to unintentional weightbearing. Knee radiographs at 6 weeks post-procedure demonstrated a displaced proximal tibia fracture through the autograft harvest site. Further clinical review revealed metabolic derangements consistent with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Initial nonoperative treatment led to atrophic varus nonunion requiring definitive treatment with total knee arthroplasty with revision components. Conclusion: This case describes a rare complication of proximal tibial autograft harvest and highlights the importance of preoperative metabolic workup and bone health optimization.Level of Evidence: IV.

Conversion of External Fixator to Intramedullary Nail in Tibial fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Conversion of provisional external fixation to intramedullary nail (IMN) in femur fractures has been reported to be safe within 14 days of initial surgery. However, there is no current literature guiding this practice in tibial fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the time period when conversion of external fixation to nail in tibial fractures is safe. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, tibial fractures (OTA 41A, 42, 43A) that received provisional ex-fix and were converted to IMN from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Skeletally mature patients with minimum 6 months of follow-up were included. The primary outcome was deep infection. External fixation days were categorized as less than 7, 8 to 14, and 15+ days. Risk ratios of infection were estimated using generalized linear regression with a Poisson distribution. A separate regression model evaluated risk factors for infection using both the external fixation and non-external fixation tibial cohorts. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (32%) were treated for deep infection. The infection rate for closed fractures was 28% (11 of 39 patients) and for open fractures was 35% (17 of 49 patients) ( P = 0.56). Examining both tibial cohorts, external fixation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, P = 0.017), open fracture (OR = 3.13, P = 0.002), and compartment syndrome (OR = 2.58, P = 0.01) were all associated with infection in regression modeling. Median external fixation days for patients with deep infection was 8 days (Inter-quartile range, 3 to 18 days) as compared with 4 days (IQR, 2 to 9 days) in patients without infection ( P = 0.06). While controlling for open fractures, the 8- to 14-day group had RR = 1.81 ( P = 0.2), and the 15+-day group had RR = 2.67 ( P = 0.003) as compared with the <7-day group. DISCUSSION: Infection rates of tibial fracture patients treated with external fixation and converted to IMN were high. Surgeons should strongly consider the necessity of external fixation for these fractures. Earlier conversion of external fixation to definitive fixation reduced infection rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Malnutrition is Common and Increases the Risk of Adverse Medical Events in Older Adults With Femoral Fragility Fractures.

Background: Femoral fragility fractures are one of the most common injuries managed by orthopedic surgeons. Malnutrition influences the poor outcomes observed in this population. Our purpose was to assess the annual trends of malnutrition diagnosis and determine risk factors for malnutrition and complications in patients 65 years and older presenting with femoral fragility fractures. We hypothesized that malnutrition would increase the risk of postoperative wound infection, wound dehiscence, non-union, and mortality. Methods: The PearlDiver database was reviewed from 2010 to 2020. Patients ≥ 65-years-old with femur fractures treated with operative fixation were identified by CPT code. A preoperative diagnosis of malnourished state was defined by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes and patients were divided into malnourished and non-malnourished cohorts. Patients were tracked for one year following operative fixation of a femoral fragility fracture for the occurrence of infection, wound dehiscence, nonunion and mortality. The rates of these complications were compared between malnourished and nonmalnourished cohorts. Results: There were 178,283 total femoral fragility fractures identified in patients aged 65-years or older. The overall prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis in this geriatric population was 12.8%. Documented malnutrition in femoral fragility fractures increased from 1.6% to 32.9% from 2010-2020 (P<0.0001). Compared to patients without malnutrition, patients with malnutrition are at increased risk of mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.2558 - 1.3752, p < 0.0001), are more likely to develop a wound infection (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.252 - 1.7626; p < 0.0001), more likely to have a wound dehiscence (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.3416 - 1.7949; p < 0.0001), and more likely to develop non-union (1.89; 95% CI 1.6946 - 2.1095; p < 0.0001). Multiple demographic variables were associated with malnutrition diagnosis including higher age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, female sex, dementia, and institutionalization. Parkinson's disease, feeding difficulty and institutionalization demographic variables had the highest risk of malnutrition. Conclusion: The current study found that malnutrition diagnosis significantly increases the risk of adverse medical events in elderly adults with femoral fragility fractures. The rates of malnutrition increased steadily from 2010-2020. This trend is likely a result of increased awareness and testing for malnutrition, not reflecting an actual increased prevalence of malnutrition. Multiple expected demographic variables are associated with diagnosis of malnutrition. Level of Evidence: III.