Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 54(5): 522-529, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29168910

ABSTRACT

AIM: Despite Australia's high vaccination rates, an estimated 3.3% of children are under-vaccinated due to vaccine refusal and the proportion of parents with concerns is unclear. Amongst Australian parents, we aimed to determine the prevalence of vaccine concerns, resources and health-care providers (HCPs) accessed and satisfaction with these resources in two different settings. We also aimed to identify relationships between the level of vaccine concern, socio-economic status and vaccine uptake. METHODS: Parents of children under 5 years attending general paediatric clinics in a tertiary paediatric hospital (n = 301/398, 76%) and children under 19 months attending community maternal child health centres (n = 311/391, 81%) completed the survey. Vaccination status was obtained from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. RESULTS: Despite high support for vaccination (98%, confidence interval (CI) 97-99), 43% of parents reported vaccine concerns (CI 40-47) including the number of vaccines given in the first 2 years (25%, CI 22 to 29), vaccine ingredients (22%, CI 19-25), allergies (18%, CI 15-21), weakening of the immune system (17%, CI 14-20) and autism (11%, CI 8-13). HCPs were the most commonly accessed and trusted information source. In all, 23% of parents reported insufficient knowledge to make good vaccination decisions (CI 20-26). There was little evidence of an association between parental vaccine acceptance or socio-economic status and vaccination status. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high support for vaccines, nearly half of Australian parents have some concerns and a quarter lack vaccine decision-making confidence regarding childhood vaccines. Parents frequently access and report high trust in HCPs, who are best placed to address parental vaccine concerns through provision of clear information, using effective communication strategies. Further research in more highly hesitant populations is required to determine the relationship between the level and nature of vaccination concerns and vaccine uptake.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Parental Consent/psychology , Parents/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Child, Preschool , Decision Making , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Maternal-Child Health Centers , Socioeconomic Factors , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Victoria
2.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 53(9): 855-861, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560731

ABSTRACT

AIM: Health-care providers are crucial in maintaining parental confidence in vaccination. Health-care providers are the most commonly accessed resource by parents for vaccine-related information and are highly trusted. We investigated paediatricians' (i) frequency of vaccine discussions; (ii) specific vaccine-related topics discussed; (iii) perceived role in childhood vaccination; (iv) challenges faced when having discussions; (v) confidence in vaccine-related knowledge and communication skills; and (vi) interest in online education and training. METHODS: We invited members of the Australian Paediatric Research Network to complete an online Research Electronic Data Capture survey in 2015-2016. RESULTS: Of 383 active Australian Paediatric Research Network members, 165 (43%) completed the online survey. A total of 61% reported 'frequently' or 'almost always' having vaccine-related discussions, with 15% 'rarely' having them. 'Lack of time' was the most commonly reported barrier to having vaccine discussions (54%). Vaccine necessity was most commonly discussed (33%), followed by vaccine safety (24%), general vaccine concerns (23%) and catch-up schedules (23%). While only 25% of paediatricians lacked confidence in their vaccine-related knowledge and 11% in their communication skills, most expressed interest in online training to address vaccine knowledge (62%) and communication skills (53%). CONCLUSION: Paediatricians play a key role in maintaining public confidence in vaccination. However, opportunities to address concerns are not being maximised by Australian paediatricians. There is a need and desire for training and resources to increase vaccine knowledge and communication skills for paediatricians, to optimise the frequency and effectiveness of vaccine discussions with parents and to ensure ongoing high immunisation coverage rates in Australia.


Subject(s)
Communication , Immunotherapy, Active/psychology , Parents/psychology , Pediatricians , Adult , Aged , Australia , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Aust Fam Physician ; 46(3): 145-151, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28260278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern. The objectives of this article were to describe Australian parents' attitudes, behaviours and concerns about vaccination, determine the factors associated with vaccination non-compliance, and provide sources of vaccination information for general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: We conducted a nationally representative online survey of Australian parents in 2012. We determined associations between demo-graphic and vaccination attitudes and behaviour. RESULTS: The 452 respondents were parents of children aged DISCUSSION: GPs have pivotal roles in addressing concerns regarding vaccination. Education and communication with parents will improve their knowledge and trust in vaccination, thereby improving vaccination compliance.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Parents/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Australia , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Safety/standards
4.
BMC Pediatr ; 17(1): 19, 2017 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28095818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, the experiences and perceptions of parents who decline vaccination are the subject of investigation. However, the experiences of clinicians who encounter these parents in the course of their work has received little academic attention to date. This study aimed to understand the challenges faced and strategies used when general practitioners and immunising nurses encounter parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. METHODS: Primary care providers were recruited from regions identified through the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) as having higher than national average rates of registered objection to childhood vaccination. Interviews began with an exploration of provider experiences with parents who accept, are hesitant towards, and who decline vaccination. Participants were asked specifically about how they addressed any difficulties they encountered in their interactions. Thematic analysis focused on encounters with parents - challenges and strategies. RESULTS: Twenty-six general practitioners (GPs), community and practice nurses (PNs) were interviewed across two regions in NSW, Australia. Providers' sense of professional identity as health advocates and experts became conflicted in their encounters with vaccine objecting parents. Providers were dissatisfied when such consultations resulted in a 'therapeutic roadblock' whereby provider-parent communication came to a standstill. There were mixed views about being asked to sign forms exempting parents from vaccinating their children. These ranged from a belief that completing the forms rewarded parents for non-conformity to seeing it as a positive opportunity for engagement. Three common strategies were employed by providers to navigate through these challenges; 1) to explore and inform, 2) to mobilise clinical rapport and 3) to adopt a general principle to first do no harm to the therapeutic relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Many healthcare providers find consultations with vaccine objecting parents challenging and some, particularly more experienced providers, employ successful strategies to address this. Primary care providers, especially those more junior, could benefit from additional communication guidance to better the outcome and increase the efficiency of their interactions with such parents.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Nurse-Patient Relations , Parents/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care , Vaccination Refusal/psychology , Child, Preschool , General Practice , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , New South Wales , Nurse-Patient Relations/ethics , Parental Consent/ethics , Parental Consent/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/ethics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/ethics , Primary Care Nursing , Primary Health Care/ethics , Qualitative Research , Vaccination Refusal/ethics
5.
Int J Infect Dis ; 47: 53-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26875699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: For reasons that have yet to be elucidated, the uptake of preventive measures against infectious diseases by Hajj pilgrims is variable. The aim of this study was to identify the preventive advice and interventions received by Australian pilgrims before Hajj, and the barriers to and facilitators of their use during Hajj. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys of Australians pilgrims aged ≥18 years were undertaken, one before and one after the Hajj 2014. RESULTS: Of 356 pilgrims who completed the survey (response rate 94%), 80% had the influenza vaccine, 30% the pneumococcal vaccine, and 30% the pertussis vaccine. Concern about contracting disease at Hajj was the most cited reason for vaccination (73.4%), and not being aware of vaccine availability was the main reason for non-receipt (56%). Those who obtained pre-travel advice were twice as likely to be vaccinated as those who did not seek advice. Of 150 pilgrims surveyed upon return, 94% reported practicing hand hygiene during Hajj, citing ease of use (67%) and belief in its effectiveness (62.4%) as the main reasons for compliance; university education was a significant predictor of hand hygiene adherence. Fifty-three percent used facemasks, with breathing discomfort (76%) and a feeling of suffocation (40%) being the main obstacles to compliance. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there are significant opportunities to improve awareness among Australian Hajj pilgrims about the importance of using preventive health measures.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Travel , Vaccination , Adult , Aged , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hand Hygiene , Holidays , Humans , Influenza Vaccines , Islam , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Saudi Arabia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
J Epidemiol Glob Health ; 6(3): 147-55, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26279527

ABSTRACT

This study examines the feasibility of using a smartphone application (app) to conduct surveys among travellers during the Hajj pilgrimage, where the use of apps has not been evaluated for infectious disease surveillance. A longitudinal study was conducted among pilgrims at the Hajj 2014 using an iPhone app with separate questionnaires for three study phases covering before, during, and after Hajj. Forty-eight pilgrims from 13 countries downloaded the app. Respondents were aged between 21 and 61 (median 36) years and 58.5% (24/41) were male. Of these, 85% (41/48) completed the first phase, 52% (25/41) completed both the second and third phases, and 25 of these reported meningococcal vaccination, with 36% (9/25) receiving other vaccines. All (25) reported hand hygiene use and 64% (16/25) wore a facemask at some point during the pilgrimage. Four (6%) reported close contact with camels. Respiratory symptoms commenced from the 4th day of Hajj, with sore throat (20%) and cough (12%) being the most common. Three participants (12%) reported respiratory symptoms after returning home. Conducting a prospective survey using a smartphone app to collect data on travel-associated infections and traveller compliance to prevention is feasible at mass gatherings and can provide useful data associated with health-related behaviour.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Health Surveys/methods , Mobile Applications , Smartphone , Travel-Related Illness , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Islam , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Population Surveillance , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Travel , Young Adult
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(9): 2600-2, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25483479

ABSTRACT

Public acceptance of vaccination has never been a given. Today there is a set of societal circumstances that may contribute to a growing parental hesitancy about vaccination. These include: increasingly 'crowded' vaccination schedules; lower prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases; greater access to, and more rapid dissemination of, vaccine-critical messages via digital networks; hyper-vigilance of parents in relation to children and risk; and an increasingly consumerist orientation to healthcare.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Decision Making , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans
8.
J Appl Psychol ; 94(4): 1032-47, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19594242

ABSTRACT

Negotiations present individuals with a paradox. On the one hand, individuals are expected via social norms and formal regulations to be honest and straightforward in their negotiations. On the other hand, individuals who mislead their negotiation counterpart are often rewarded with more favorable settlements. The authors investigate this paradox by examining the relationship between negotiators' dispositional straightforwardness and concessions made during a negotiation. Drawing from the dual concern model (D. G. Pruitt & J. Z. Rubin, 1986), the authors show how dispositional straightforwardness leads individuals to develop a greater concern for their counterpart's interests, which in turn leads to greater concession making during the negotiation. The authors then show how this individual-level relationship is moderated by features of the negotiation task, namely integrative potential and power.


Subject(s)
Character , Deception , Negotiating , Power, Psychological , Truth Disclosure , Altruism , Decision Making , Empathy , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Models, Organizational , Models, Psychological , Personnel Management , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...