An ultrasound system for simultaneous ultrasound hyperthermia and photon beam irradiation.

PURPOSE: An existing ultrasound system has been adapted for simultaneous use with external photon beam irradiation. The system is being used to investigate the potential for increased biological benefit of simultaneously combined hyperthermia and external beam irradiation with currently achievable temperature distributions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An existing clinical ultrasound system has been modified for simultaneous operation with a 60Co teletherapy machine. The generator, thermometry system, computer, and applicators are located inside the treatment room, while the monitor and system control are located at the control console. Two approaches have been used clinically to combine the two modalities. In the first approach, an en-face setup is used in which the ultrasound beam and the photon beam travel through the same window of entry to the tumor. This is acheived by a reflecting system designed to deflect the ultrasound to the tumor while positioning the ultrasound transducer outside the radiation beam. The reflecting system consists of water and water-equivalent materials except for a 1 mm sheet of polished brass that is used as the reflector. The relative pressure fields were measured in water at the same distance from the ultrasound source using a scanning hydrophone with and without the reflector at the two operating frequencies of the device (1.0 and 3.4 MHz) for two applicators. Radiation dosimetry measurements were performed to determine the relationship between 60Co irradiation through the reflector and absorbed dose. In the second approach the ultrasound and the radiation beam travel into the tumor from different windows of entry such that the radiation beam passes through no portion of the water bolus prior to entering the patient. We have termed this approach the orthogonal approach. For both approaches, the radiation fraction is given in the middle of an uninterrupted 60-min hyperthermia treatment. RESULTS: The system modifications did not impair the ability to effectively deliver ultrasound hyperthermia or 60Co teletherapy. With the en-face approach the ultrasonic patterns generated with and without the reflector demonstrated that the ultrasound system maintained both a uniform and controllable heating pattern. The 60Co beam had no effect on the performance of the thermocouple thermometers. The radiation beam is attenuated nearly uniformly by the reflector system. To date, 10 patients have been treated with the en-face approach and 12 have been treated with the orthogonal approach (90 treatments). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implementation of ultrasound hyperthermia simultaneous with 60Co irradiation is technically and clinically feasible without any complications or hazards to the patient. The implementation of a reflecting device allows en-face delivery of both the ultrasound and 60Co irradiation. Temperatures obtained during simultaneous treatments are comparable to those historically obtained during sequential treatments with the same commercial ultrasound device.

Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance.

PURPOSE: Clinical implementation of multileaf collimation (MLC) includes commissioning (including leaf calibration), dosimetric measurements (penumbra, transmission, calculation parameters), shaping methods, networking for file transfer, verification simulation, and development of a quality assurance (QA) program. Differences of MLC and alloy shaping in terms of penumbra and stair-step effects must be analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Leaf positions are calibrated to light field. The resultant decrement line, penumbras, leaf transmission data, and isodoses in various planes were measured with film. Penumbra was measured for straight edges and corners, in various media. Ion chambers were used to measure effects of MLC on output, scatter, and depth dose. We maintain midleaf intersection criteria. MLC fields are set 7 mm beyond planning target volumes. After shaping by vendor software or by our three-dimensional planning system, files are transferred to the MLC workstation by means of sharing software, interface cards, and cabling. A MLC emulator was constructed for simulation. Our QA program includes file checks, monthly checks (leaf position accuracy and interlock tests), and annual review. RESULTS: We found the MLC leaf position (light field) corresponds to decrement lines ranging from 50 to 59%. Transmission through MLC (1.5-2.5%) is less than alloy (3.5%). Multileaf penumbra is slightly wider than for alloy. Relative penumbra did not increase in the lung, and composite field dosimetry exhibited negligible differences compared with alloy. Verification simulations provide diagnostic image quality hard copies of the MLC fields. Monitor unit parameters used for alloy held for MLC. DISCUSSION: Clinical implementation for MLC as a block replacement was conducted on a site-by-site basis. Time studies indicate significant (25%) in-room time reductions. Through imaging and dosimetric analysis, the accuracy of field delivery has increased with MLC. The most significant impact of MLC is the ability to increase the number of daily treatment fields, thereby reducing normal tissue dosing, which is vital for dose escalation.