Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(3): 304-307, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the efficacy and safety of prolonged cefazolin course for Staphylococcus infection and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria carriage after treatment. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for blood stream infections (BSI) and osteoarticular infections (OAI) by methicillin susceptible staphylococcal species treated with cefazolin from January 2015 to July 2017. Rectal and nasal swabs were performed at cefazolin initiation and end of treatment to detect respectively methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, 41 had a bacteremia including 22 endocarditis and 22 OAI. Mean duration of treatment was 21.5 days at a mean daily dose of 6.5g/d. Fifty-five (94.5%) received combination therapy. Fifty-two (89.7%) of patients achieved bacteriological cure. Four patients were ESBL carriers at inclusion. No additional ESBL or MRSA were detected by end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin appears as an effective and safe treatment for BSI or osteoarticular infection and does not appear to select MRSA or ESBL.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cefazolin/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bone Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Cloxacillin/administration & dosage , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
2.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 49(4): 261-267, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27866452

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative instrumented spine infection (PISI) is a severe complication of invasive spine procedures. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients treated for PISI between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2012 in a French University Hospital. The objectives of this study were to describe the outcome of patients treated with debridement-irrigation, antibiotic therapy and implant retention (DAIR) within three months after the occurrence of PISI and to identify factors associated with relapse. RESULTS: Among 4290 patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis surgery during the 5-year study period, 129 had PISI treated by debridement-irrigation in the first three months (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.5-3.5). Fifty-two (40%) were female and the median age was 57 years. Fourteen patients (10.8%) had diabetes and 73 (56.6%) had a BMI (Body Mass Index) ≥25 kg/m2. Staphylocccus aureus, enterobacteria or polymicrobial infections were identified in 44.0, 18.0 and 13.0% of cases, respectively. One hundred and six patients (82.2%) and one hundred and twenty-one patients (93.8%) were cured after one DAIR and after two DAIR, respectively. In multivariate logistic analysis, polymicrobial infection was associated with relapse (Odd Ratio [OR] = 3.81; 95%CI: 1.06-13.66; p = .03), while a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was a protective factor (OR =0.25; 95%CI: 0.07-0.89; p = .03). CONCLUSION: DAIR may be effective for PISI when performed within the first 3 months after onset of infection. Relapses are significantly associated with polymicrobial infection and negatively associated with moderate overweight. These results need to be confirmed in future prospective studies.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Debridement , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Spondylitis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
ACS Synth Biol ; 3(12): 949-52, 2014 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25524095

ABSTRACT

The lac promoter is one of the most commonly used promoters for expression control of recombinant genes in E. coli. In the absence of galactosides, the lac promoter is repressed by its repressor protein LacI. Since the lac promoter is regulated by a repressor, overexpression of LacI is necessary for regulation when the promoter is introduced on a high-copy plasmid. For that purpose, a modified variant of LacI, a LVA-tagged LacI, was submitted to the Registry of Standard Biological Parts and has been used for more than 500 constructs since then. We have found, however, that natural LacI is superior to the LVA-tagged LacI as controller of expression.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli/genetics , Genetic Engineering/methods , Lac Operon/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Spectrometry, Fluorescence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...