Education in Care and Technology; Development and Evaluation of a First Cohort of an International Master Course.

A report written as a personal communication based on the experience gathered by developing and delivery of a international professional master course. The organization of the curriculum consists of 16 modules. Using a framework of the user centered design and development cycle students receive domain knowledge related to user-orientation, business, innovation and implementation. Also, introduction is given to tools that can be used to investigate certain aspects. The course will be completed by the performance of master thesis research related of a practice oriented problem relevant to the work environment of the student. This master-course has been followed by a first cohort of 8 students. In this report, an evaluation is given on this first delivery. Organization of this course is complicated by the marketing conditions that have to be used. Students and teachers are well supported by the distance based learning environment. The 16 modules representing the content of the course contains a variety of subjects and methods and represents a huge educational load to the students. Translating this content to the development of the own applied research subject contributes to the learning process. The first cohort of students will complete their master thesis in July 2017. Further introduction of new cohorts will mainly depend on the possibility to reduce the financial constraints to participation.

Education in care and technology, a facilitator of interdisciplinary research and development.

OBJECTIVE: Application of technology in care is hindered by two factors; a critical attitude of care professionals towards the use of technology as part of care delivery and a lack of knowledge of care practice by technology developers. Technological developments may provide adequate solutions to support care provision. The principles of user centred design and development, traditionally used in the development of assistive technology, may provide powerful tools to support care provision. Interdisciplinary research will be needed to take full benefit. Educational programs to support this development are lacking. Main content of this paper: Six organisations of higher education have taken the initiative to organize a training program to support professionals active in the care or in the technology domain that enables them to become involved in interdisciplinary research and development. RESULTS: a European program to educate a professional master in Care and Technology has been developed and is described in this paper. Accreditation of the program is initiated. CONCLUSION: Alumni of such a program may form a European network of professionals that are active in developing new solutions to support people with special needs and contribute to the generation of new business.

Experiences of using a memory aid to structure and support daily activities in a small-scale group accommodation for people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Use of technology to structure and support the daily activities of the residents in a small-scale group accommodation (SSGA) for dementia is a new innovation in the Netherlands. This paper presents the process of development of this new way of structuring activities and the findings of a pilot study looking at the experiences of using this device in people with dementia. METHOD: A qualitative method was chosen, data were collected using individual interviews with the residents (n = 6), focus groups interviews with informal carers (n = 5) and members of staff (n = 6). Data were analysed using Ritchie & Spencer's framework (1994). FINDINGS: Three main themes emerged: issues regarding the implementation, needs for further development and the learning experiences acquired during the development. The majority of the residents were happy with the use and function of the memory aid. However, the occurrence of installation errors, limited ease of use and a lack of knowledge regarding the function and use of the memory aid were issues that prevented a successful implementation. Findings highlighted shared views about ways of improving through adaptation of the software program and additional technological applications; internet connectivity, improving its accessibility by using a remote control and adding videos and photos. CONCLUSION: Lessons are learned about the use and transferability of this innovation in people with dementia and other vulnerable target groups including those with learning disabilities as well as its limitation and the needs for further development.

Randomised controlled trial of unsolicited occupational therapy in community-dwelling elderly people: the LOTIS trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this trial, the Leiden 85-Plus Occupational Therapy Intervention Study (LOTIS), was to assess whether unsolicited occupational therapy, as compared to no therapy, can decelerate the increase in disability in high-risk elderly people. DESIGN: This was a randomised controlled trial with 2-y follow-up. SETTING: The study took place in the municipality of Leiden in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 402 community-dwelling 85-y-old people, with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of >18 points at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the intervention group were visited by an occupational therapist who provided training and education about assistive devices that were already present and who gave recommendations and information about procedures, possibilities, and costs of assistive devices and community-based services. Control participants were not visited by an occupational therapist. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the score achieved on the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Secondary outcome measures included self-evaluations of well-being and feelings of loneliness. RESULTS: THE PARTICIPANTS WERE EVENLY DIVIDED BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS: 202 participants were allocated to the intervention group and 200 participants to the control group. Of the 202 participants randomised to occupational therapy, 55 participants declined the proposed intervention. An occupational therapist indicated that of the remaining 147 participants, 66 (45%) needed an occupational therapy intervention. A total of 44 new assistive devices and five community-based services were implemented. During follow-up there was a progressive increase in disability in the intervention group (mean annual increase, 2.0 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001) and control group (mean annual increase, 2.1 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001). The increase in disability was not significantly different between study groups (0.08 points; 95% CI, -1.1-1.2; p = 0.75). There was also no difference between study groups for any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Unsolicited occupational therapy in high-risk elderly participants does not decelerate the increase in disability over time.

Assistive devices and community-based services among 85-year-old community-dwelling elderly in The Netherlands: ownership, use, and need for intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the home-situation of the oldest old regarding the ownership, use, and need for intervention of assistive devices and community-based services. METHODS: A research nurse and an occupational therapist, who evaluated the current situation regarding ownership and use of assistive devices, visited a representative group of 147 Dutch community-dwelling 85-year-olds in their own homes. Furthermore, the occupational therapist assessed whether an intervention was indicated. Assistance in purchasing devices, information, and instruction were provided when necessary. RESULTS: 94% of the subjects owned one or more assistive devices, with a mean of 4.5 (SD 2.7) assistive devices. Most frequently owned were grab rails. Of the total number of 591 assistive devices, 74 (13%) were not in use. In 66 of the 147 (45%) subjects at least one intervention was indicated. A total number of 23 subjects received information and instruction on mobility-related issues, while 17 subjects received information and instruction on personal care-related issues. Moreover, for 19 subjects an application procedure was started for a total of 25 assistive devices and five community-based services in the mobility category while for 19 subjects an application procedure was started for a total of 31 devices and four services in the personal care category. CONCLUSIONS: Based on detailed information from occupational therapists, the home situation of community-dwelling elderly regarding the presence and use of assistive devices and community-based services is not optimal.