Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort.

BACKGROUND: Long-term effects of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the risk of ovarian malignancies are unknown. METHODS: We identified a nationwide historic cohort of 19,146 women who received IVF treatment in the Netherlands between 1983 and 1995, and a comparison group of 6006 subfertile women not treated with IVF. In 1997-1999, data on reproductive risk factors were obtained from 65% of women and data on subfertility (treatment) were obtained from the medical records. The incidence of ovarian malignancies (including borderline ovarian tumours) through 2007 was assessed through linkage with disease registries. The risk of ovarian malignancies in the IVF group was compared with risks in the general population and the subfertile comparison group. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 14.7 years, the risk of borderline ovarian tumours was increased in the IVF group compared with the general population [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.56]. The overall SIR for invasive ovarian cancer was not significantly elevated, but increased with longer follow-up after first IVF (P = 0.02); the SIR was 3.54 (95% CI = 1.62-6.72) after 15 years. The risks of borderline ovarian tumours and of all ovarian malignancies combined in the IVF group were significantly increased compared with risks in the subfertile comparison group (hazard ratios = 4.23; 95% CI = 1.25-14.33 and 2.14; 95% CI = 1.07-4.25, respectively, adjusted for age, parity and subfertility cause). CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation for IVF may increase the risk of ovarian malignancies, especially borderline ovarian tumours. More large cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings and to examine the effect of IVF treatment characteristics.

Birth weight and age at menarche in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome or diminished ovarian reserve, in a retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the association between subfertility in women and factors in early life such as birth weight and age at menarche, and most have produced contradictory results. In the present study, this association was investigated among women undergoing artificial reproductive techniques (ART), including IVF for reason of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or diminished ovarian reserve. Herein, PCOS included oligomenorrhoea and at least one additional symptom such as hyperandrogenism, hirsutism or polycystic ovaries on ultrasound. In most patients this was concomitant with elevated serum LH levels. Diminished ovarian reserve was defined as receiving a donated oocyte or having a low response to ovarian hyperstimulation. METHODS: Among a retrospective cohort of 26 428 women diagnosed with subfertility between 1980 and 1995, three study groups and one reference group were defined using data from medical records. Women were included in the first group if diagnosed as having PCOS (n = 265). In order to define diminished ovarian reserve capacity, two groups were selected: (i) women receiving a donated oocyte (n = 98); and (ii) women having a low response (three follicles or less) to ovarian hyperstimulation in both their first and second IVF cycles (n = 351). Women with tubal obstruction formed the reference group (n = 957). In a logistic regression model, the effect of birth weight and age at menarche was examined. Information on both variables was obtained from mailed questionnaires. RESULTS: Birth weight did not differ significantly between the study groups and the reference group. However, PCOS patients were significantly older at menarche [OR 3.31 (2.18-5.04)]. Women receiving a donated oocyte and low responders were significantly younger at menarche [OR 2.67 (1.35-5.29) and OR 2.01 (1.26-3.20) respectively]. CONCLUSION: The fetal origins hypothesis, the association between intrauterine growth retardation and disease in adult life, could not be confirmed, though a relationship between timing of menarche and PCOS and a diminished ovarian reserve was identified. Further investigation of the effect of birth weight on fertility outcome in a prospective setting is strongly advised.