Disentangling vulnerabilities from outcomes: Distinctions between trait affect and depressive symptoms in adolescent and adult samples.

BACKGROUND: Trait negative affect and trait positive affect are affective vulnerabilities to depressive symptoms in adolescence and adulthood. While trait affect and the state affect characteristic of depressive symptoms are proposed to be theoretically distinct, no studies have established that these constructs are statistically distinct. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to determine whether the trait affect (e.g. temperament dimensions) that predicts depressive symptoms and the state affect characteristic of depressive symptoms are statistically distinct among early adolescents and adults. We hypothesized that trait negative affect, trait positive affect, and depressive symptoms would represent largely distinct factors in both samples. METHOD: Participants were 268 early adolescents (53.73% female) and 321 young adults (70.09% female) who completed self-report measures of demographic information, trait affect, and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Principal axis factoring with oblique rotation for both samples indicated distinct adolescent factor loadings and overlapping adult factor loadings. Confirmatory factor analyses in both samples supported distinct but related relationships between trait NA, trait PA, and depressive symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include our cross-sectional design that prevented examination of self-reported fluctuations in trait affect and depressive symptoms and the unknown potential effects of self-report biases among adolescents and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support existing theoretical distinctions between adolescent constructs but highlight a need to revise or remove items to distinguish measurements of adult trait affect and depressive symptoms. Adolescent trait affect and depressive symptoms are statistically distinct, but adult trait affect and depressive symptoms statistically overlap and warrant further consideration.

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique.

BACKGROUND: Radial arteries are being used more often for coronary artery bypass grafting. A minimally invasive technique was devised for harvesting vessels and compared with the traditional harvesting technique. METHODS: In a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, 100 patients had traditional open radial artery harvesting and 100 underwent endoscopic radial artery harvesting. All patients had a preoperative modified Allen's test with Doppler imaging. The traditional technique involved a longitudinal incision over the radial aspect of the arm from the wrist to the antecubital fossa. The radial artery was dissected subfascially and removed. The endoscopic technique involved a 3-cm incision over the radial aspect of the arm. A vessel loop was placed around the artery and carbon dioxide was insufflated into the wound. The radial artery was dissected to the brachial artery and ligated with an Endo-loop ligature. The branches were divided with bipolar electrocautery and ligated with clips. Patients were evaluated for postoperative pain, bleeding, neuralgias, infection, and any adverse events. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All 200 radial arteries were successfully harvested and used as grafts. Patients who had undergone endoscopic radial artery harvesting had significantly fewer major complications than patients who underwent the open technique: hematomas (five versus no complications) or wound infections requiring antibiotics (seven versus one complication). The occurrence of major neuralgias that restricted function were also significantly lower postoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months later (ten versus one, eight versus one, five versus zero, and one versus zero, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting results in good cosmetic results, useable grafts, and minimal neuralgias. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than traditional open radial artery harvesting.

Epicardial atrial defibrillation: successful treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after cardiac surgery. Current medical treatment using antiarrhythmics and anticoagulants has a significant morbidity. The goal of this study was to determine if epicardial atrial defibrillation can be safely performed and return patients to sinus rhythm. METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery was performed. Patients with a prior pacemaker/defibrillator, history of arrhythmia, preoperative antiarrhythmic, age greater than 85 years, history of stroke, or intraaortic balloon pump were excluded. Temporary epicardial atrial cardioversion wires were placed on the right and left atrium. Bipolar atrial and ventricular pacing wires were also placed. The wires were tested in the operating room. Patients who went into postoperative arial fibrillation were cardioverted with 3 J, 6 J, or 9 J. RESULTS: There were 45 patients enrolled. Sixteen patients (35%) went into postoperative arial fibrillation during their hospital stay. Mean time to onset of arial fibrillation was 2.6 +/- 1.4 days after surgery. Fifteen patients were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm on the primary cardioversion, with mean of 5.7 +/- 2.4 J. One patient was cardioverted at 6 hours after onset of arial fibrillation, at 6 J. Recurrent arial fibrillation occurred in 4 patients during their hospital stay. All 4 of these patients were cardioverted with a mean of 6.4 +/- 2.6 J. All wires were removed the day before patients were discharged. There were no complications with wire insertion or removal. There were no adverse neurologic events. The mean hospital stay was 5.1 +/- 2.2 days. All patients were in sinus rhythm at 1 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a temporary atrial defibrillator to resynchronize patients in postoperative arial fibrillation is safe and effective.