ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The majority of bladder cancer patients experience recurrence. Cisplatin is the standard chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer though adverse effects are often severe. CASE REPORT: Intravenous (IV) dicycloplatin (DCP) sustained remission in an American bladder cancer patient for five years. A recurrent mass was observed in July 2021. The patient received DCP capsules for seven weeks with no significant side-effects. Complete blood count with differential and a basic metabolic panel showed no adverse effects of DCP capsules on the bone marrow, liver or renal parameters. Cystoscopy after oral DCP found no evident bladder tumors; cytology was negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: In this patient, DCP-capsules appeared to be as effective as DCP-IV for achieving bladder cancer remission. Both forms of DCP chemotherapy are convenient, active against several cancer types, with decreased adverse effects compared to cisplatin. Both have been available for treating cancer patients in China. A USA clinical trial of DCP in bladder and other cancers appears warranted.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Papillary/drug therapy , Glutamates/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Capsules , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Drug Combinations , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Platinum-based chemotherapy often fails due to its severe adverse effects. The aim of this study was to examine the adverse effects profile and efficacy of dicycloplatin and compare them to those of cisplatin and carboplatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystoscopy surveillance of the first American cancer patient treated with dicycloplatin was performed quarterly. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted using immunoblotting and flow cytometry to assess immune status of spleen and bone marrow of mice treated with dicycloplatin, cisplatin and carboplatin. RESULTS: The American patient did not suffer clinically significant myelosuppression; dicycloplatin has sustained remission in this patient to date. Experimental studies showed that dicycloplatin is less toxic to bone marrow and spleen of mice than cisplatin and carboplatin. CONCLUSION: Dicycloplatin is a promising drug in cancer chemotherapy with less aggressive side-effects than those typically associated with cisplatin and carboplatin. This is an important therapeutic advantage in cancer chemotherapy. Clinical investigation of dicycloplatin as an alternative to cisplatin or carboplatin is warranted.
