ABSTRACT
AIM: The Covid-19 pandemic has delayed elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. The aim of this study was to see whether or not this may affect overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). METHOD: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020189158). Medline, EMBASE and Scopus were interrogated. Patients aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer who received elective surgery as their primary treatment were included. Delay to elective surgery was defined as the period between CRC diagnosis and the day of surgery. Meta-analysis of the outcomes OS and DFS were conducted. Forest plots, funnel plots and tests of heterogeneity were produced. An estimated number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated for statistically significant pooled hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Of 3753 articles identified, seven met the inclusion criteria. Encompassing 314 560 patients, three of the seven studies showed that a delay to elective resection is associated with poorer OS or DFS. OS was assessed at a 1 month delay, the HR for six datasets was 1.13 (95% CI 1.02-1.26, p = 0.020) and at 3 months the pooled HR for three datasets was 1.57 (95% CI 1.16-2.12, p = 0.004). The estimated NNH for a delay at 1 month and 3 months was 35 and 10 respectively. Delay was nonsignificantly negatively associated with DFS on meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This review recommends that elective surgery for CRC patients is not postponed longer than 4 weeks, as available evidence suggests extended delays from diagnosis are associated with poorer outcomes. Focused research is essential so patient groups can be prioritized based on risk factors in future delays or pandemics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Adult , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Pandemics , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The efficacy of capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in colon cancer is well demonstrated and its lower toxicity rates when compared with 5-FU make it an increasingly more favourable option for patients. This case highlights the awareness of a potentially severe side effect related to the use of capecitabine, yet through the early identification of symptoms patients can be managed conservatively.
ABSTRACT
A 34-year-old woman with peri-anal pain and swelling was operated in the emergency setting assuming a diagnosis of a perianal abscess. No pus was revealed. Later magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested induration and a mass effect in the peri-anal region. Examination under anaesthesia was repeated which revealed a mobile but firm mass. Histology from trucut biopsies diagnosed it as a peri-anal endometrioma arising from an episiotomy scar. Peri-anal endometrioma can rarely developin episiotomy scars and can be easily mistaken as an abscess by junior surgeons.
ABSTRACT
Migration has been highlighted as a serious complication of open inguinal hernia repair with the "plug-and-patch" technique. We used an English language Medline search from 1995 to 2006. Review of the literature found that three cases showed poor surgical technique, one case did not show true migration, another was a case of the wrong operation being done, and in the final case, the patient was in overall very poor health. Mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair can be avoided if proper attention to detail is used at the time of initial repair.
Subject(s)
Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Surgical Mesh , Foreign-Body Migration/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications , ReoperationABSTRACT
Elderly patients commonly present to hospital following a collapse and period of distressing immobilisation on the floor. We present a case of bilateral trench foot in such a patient with no prior peripheral vascular disease. Examination of the feet is mandatory for early detection of this rare condition in the collapsed elderly patient.
