Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Rural Health ; 29(3): 248-57, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23802927

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare 2 strategies, stage-matched nursing and community intervention (SMN+CI) and community intervention (CI) alone in changing cardiovascular risk factors in up to 3 behavioral areas: diet, physical activity, and/or smoking among rural women. METHODS: A 14-month, multisite randomized controlled trial of 117 rural women was conducted. Transtheoretical model was used in identification of stage of change and development of the SMN+CI nursing interventions. A social-ecological model was used to address issues of rurality in the development of interventions. FINDINGS: The SMN + CI group was superior on 4 outcomes. There were significant increases in 2 measures of dietary intake; improvement in dietary stage of change for fruits and vegetables; and reduced diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the SMN + CI group. After log transformation DBP significance was lost. The CI group had a significant reduction in change in total cholesterol; however, significance was lost after control for the initiation of lipid lowering medications. There was a significant reduction in Framingham risk scores pre- to postintervention, regardless of group. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be a need to improve cardiovascular risk factors in rural women. There should be an exploration of whether intensified dose and fidelity of the intervention strategies of diet and physical activity are effective in improving anthropometric and laboratory values. Further investigation is warranted into factors influencing the pre- to postreduction in Framingham risk scores.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Health Promotion/methods , Rural Population , Adult , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Risk Reduction Behavior , United States
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 20(3): 662-77, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19648696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Research has shown that there is less use of mental health services in rural areas even when availability, accessibility, demographic, and need factors are controlled. This study examined mental health treatment disparities by determining treatment rates across different racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Data from the first four panels of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used for these analyses. The sample consisted of 36,288 respondents yielding 75,347 person-year observations. The Economic Research Service's Rural-Urban Continuum was used as a measure of rurality. RESULTS: Findings show that rural residence does little to contribute to existing treatment disparities for racial/ethnic minorities living in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that characteristics of the rural environment may disadvantage all residents with respect to mental health treatment. In more populated areas where mental health services are more plentiful, complex racial and service system factors may play a greater role in evident ethnic/racial treatment disparities.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/psychology , Healthcare Disparities , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Rural Population , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
3.
Ann Epidemiol ; 17(8): 634-42, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17531504

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the recruitment goals that investigators set for racial/ethnic minorities and the factors associated with failure to meet those goals. METHODS: Four hundred forty principal investigators (PIs) conducting clinical research funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in 2001 completed a mailed survey providing their minority recruitment goals and enrollment data for their most recent NHLBI-funded study. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of PIs set goals for African Americans, 68% for Hispanics, 55% for Asian Americans, 35% for Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, and 23% of PIs set recruitment goals for American Indians/Native Alaskans. Among those PIs who did set minority recruitment goals, the mean goal for the recruitment of African Americans was 31%, 16% for Hispanics, and 9% for Asian Americans. Twenty-seven percent of PIs failed to meet their recruitment goals for African Americans, 23% for Asian Americans, and 23% for Hispanics. After adjusting for multiple investigator and trial characteristics, the type of study (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 3.4 for observational vs. phase III trial) completion of study enrollment (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2, 3.4), and PI identification of a larger number of major barriers to participation (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1, 3.0) were all associated with failure to meet recruitment goals for African Americans. However, no factors were consistently associated with failure to meet recruitment goals across different racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators often do not set recruitment goals for some racial/ethnic groups. Factors associated with failure to meet recruitment goals vary in the recruitment of different minority groups.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Biomedical Research/standards , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Research Support as Topic/standards , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Rights/standards , Data Collection , Ethnicity/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minority Groups/psychology , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Odds Ratio , Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
4.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 99(5): 489-98, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17534006

ABSTRACT

We examined the range and nature of investigators' communication and relationship building as they recruit minority participants in their research. Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 33 investigators conducting research with human participants. The response rate was 77%. Investigators described several kinds of relationships that are formed or called upon when including minority participants in research. The relationships ranged from study-related, short-term interactions geared solely to facilitate recruitment to others that were longer term, extending beyond a particular project. The data suggest that a range of relationships is important as investigators seek to include minority populations in research. These relationships can both facilitate the recruitment process as well as aid in the interpretation of research findings.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel/ethnology , Biomedical Research , Black or African American/psychology , Culture , Minority Groups/psychology , Research Personnel/psychology , Researcher-Subject Relations , Communication , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Patient Selection , Research Support as Topic , Residence Characteristics , Social Support , Southeastern United States , United States , Universities
5.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 27(6): 580-6, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16839822

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Attaining adequate minority participation in clinical trials has been challenging and limited by the lack of data on the role that investigator perceptions play in minority recruitment. We sought to determine what investigator and study factors were associated with investigators' reported success in recruiting minority populations in research. METHODS: Principal investigators (PIs) who conducted clinical research funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in 2001 were surveyed about their success in recruiting minority populations, perceptions about the importance of minority recruitment, use of recruitment strategies, and barriers to minority recruitment. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PIs' reports of success in minority recruitment. RESULTS: A total of 440 PIs completed the survey about minority recruitment. PIs who agreed more strongly about the importance of minority inclusion in their research reported being more successful in minority recruitment. PIs who reported midstream modifications to their recruitment strategies to increase minority participation and those who reported more barriers reported less success in recruiting minority populations. CONCLUSION: PIs' reports of success in recruiting ethnic/racial minority populations for research are associated with the value investigators place on inclusion of minority participants in their research. PIs' perceptions should be considered in minority recruitment efforts as they may influence minority participation rates.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Culture , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Patient Selection , Research Personnel , Research Support as Topic , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Research Design , United States
6.
Gerontologist ; 42(2): 237-72, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11914467

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The goals of this review are to synthesize what is known about caregiving among diverse groups and to identify gaps in knowledge to guide future research on caregiving. The review focuses on conceptual and theoretical approaches, sampling strategies, measurement techniques, and similarities and differences found among groups and across studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: A narrative approach was used to review 59 articles published between 1980 and 2000, with particular attention to race, ethnicity, and/or culture. Primary sources of relevant articles included electronic databases, other review articles, and reference lists. RESULTS: Caregiving experiences and outcomes varied across racial and ethnic groups. However, the use of nontheoretical approaches, nonprobability samples, and inconsistent measures among studies has limited understanding of caregiving among diverse populations. IMPLICATIONS: It is important that conceptualization and theorizing broaden with increasing numbers of studies that include diverse groups. Future caregiving research needs to give more attention to such issues as acculturation, assimilation, and cultural values, beliefs, and norms, while also improving theoretical and methodological rigor.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/classification , Caregivers/psychology , Culture , Ethnicity , Racial Groups , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Research Design , Social Support
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...