West Nile virus infection in blood donors in the New York City area during the 2010 seasonal epidemic.

BACKGROUND: A uniform threshold strategy for converting from minipool (MP)-nucleic acid testing (NAT) to individual donation (ID)-NAT screening for acute West Nile virus (WNV) infection among blood donors is lacking. We report on WNV screening at the New York Blood Center during the 2010 seasonal WNV epidemic, the most severe epidemic in that state since the original outbreak in 1999. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between July 1 and October 31, 2010, blood donations were screened by MP-NAT or ID-NAT and the presence of anti-WNV immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG was evaluated among NAT-positive donations. RESULTS: Twenty presumed viremic donations were identified for a frequency of 0.0129% (1 in 7752 donations). Nine donations that could have been missed by MP-NAT were identified. Two of these donations were both IgM and IgG negative, one of which would have been missed if more than one positive donation was required for initiating ID-NAT. Retrospective ID-NAT revealed two positive donations. The majority of the NAT-positive donations in New York (16/19) were from donors who lived in counties that had the highest incidence of human WNV cases in the state. CONCLUSION: Our data details the identification of WNV NAT-positive blood donations during a severe seasonal epidemic in the New York area. By initiating ID-NAT after one positive donation, using retrospective testing, and triggering ID-NAT regionally, we were able to prevent the release of presumably infectious donations. The detection of NAT-positive donations with retrospective testing, however, may indicate the need for changes in our trigger criteria.

West Nile virus testing experience in 2007: evaluation of different criteria for triggering individual-donation nucleic acid testing.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, clients served by Blood Systems Laboratories used variable approaches for triggering West Nile virus (WNV) RNA individual-donation (ID) nucleic acid testing (NAT). These included two minipool (MP) NAT-reactive donations and a greater than 1:1000 rate in a 7-day interval (primary trigger), criteria based on one MP-NAT-reactive donation when there was WNV activity in overlapping and/or adjacent geographic areas (neighbor trigger), or zero MP-NAT-reactive donation (self-trigger). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Procleix WNV assay was used in either a 16-sample MP or an ID format. NAT-repeat reactivity or anti-immunoglobulin M (IgM) positivity defined true positives (TPs). TPs that were negative on 1:16 dilution testing were considered ID-NAT yield cases. RESULTS: WNV NAT performed on 1,217,929 donations identified 162 TPs; 87 were detected by MP (rate of 0.008%) and 75 by ID (rate of 0.10%; p < 0.0001). There were 34 ID-NAT yield cases, including 4 IgM/immunoglobulin G (IgG)-negative and 9 IgM-positive/IgG-negative donations. Rates of yield cases by primary, neighbor, and self-triggering were 0.077, 0.052, and 0.004% (p = 0.0003). None of 11 ID-NAT yield cases detected by the neighbor trigger would have been detected if the primary trigger had been used. CONCLUSIONS: Primary triggering criteria identified 21 viremic donations that would have been missed by MP testing; however, 11 other low-level viremic donations required more stringent criteria (e.g., neighbor trigger) for detection. It is reasonable to adopt more stringent ID-NAT triggers, including elimination of the rate criterion and triggering on one NAT-reactive donation for regions adjacent to centers which have already triggered.

Clearance of hepatitis C virus RNA from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of blood donors who spontaneously or therapeutically control their plasma viremia.

UNLABELLED: We determined whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA could be detected associated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of seropositive blood donors who had spontaneously or therapeutically cleared their plasma viremia. Blood donor plasma viremia status was first determined with a highly sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) test performed in duplicate assays. PBMC from 69 aviremic and 56 viremic blood donors were then analyzed for the presence of HCV RNA with TMA adapted to detect viral RNA in PBMC and with a reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction assay. PBMC-associated HCV RNA was detected in none of the 69 aviremic donors, including all 6 subjects with a sustained viral response following antiviral therapy. PBMC-associated HCV RNA was detected in 43 of the 56 viremic donors. The 13 viremic donors with no detectable PBMC-associated HCV RNA all had very low viral loads (6 positive only in 1 of 2 duplicate plasma TMA assays, 6 with viral loads below 100 HCV RNA copies/mL, and 1 with a viremia of 2700 HCV RNA copies/mL). The absence of detectable PBMC HCV RNA detection in all 69 aviremic donors reported here contrasts with prior studies, possibly as a result of the higher sensitivity of the TMA assay used to test for plasma viremia. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that PBMC are unlikely to serve as a long-lived reservoir of HCV in aviremic subjects.

Performance of a transcription-mediated-amplification HIV-1 RNA assay in pooled specimens.

BACKGROUND: Very limited data exist on the comparative performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) for the screening of pooled specimens for acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. STUDY DESIGN: In this study, we compared a transcription-mediated-amplification assay (Procleix HIV-1 Discriminatory Assay, [TMA]) with a branched DNA assay (Bayer Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay, [bDNA]). RESULTS: After re-testing 1552 samples that were negative for HIV RNA by bDNA, we found one additional positive sample with the TMA assay. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that TMA could potentially detect acute HIV infections missed by other technologies.