Shifting care from community hospitals to intensive community support: a mixed method study.

Aim To examine how the introduction of intensive community support (ICS) affected admissions to community hospital (CH) and to explore the views of patients, carers and health professionals on this transition. BACKGROUND: ICS was introduced to provide an alternative to CH provision for patients (mostly very elderly) requiring general rehabilitation. METHOD: Routine data from both services were analysed to identify the number of admissions and length of stay between September 2012 and September 2014. In total, 10 patients took part in qualitative interviews. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were undertaken with 19 staff members, including managers and clinicians. Findings There were 5653 admissions to CH and 1710 to ICS between September 2012 and September 2014. In the five months before the introduction of ICS, admission rates to CH were on average 217/month; in the final five months of the study, when both services were fully operational, average numbers of patients admitted were: CH 162 (a 25% reduction), ICS 97, total 259 (a 19% increase). Patients and carers rated both ICS and CH favourably compared with acute hospital care. Those who had experienced both services felt each to be appropriate at the time; they appreciated the 24 h availability of staff in CH when they were more dependent, and the convenience of being at home after they had improved. In general, staff welcomed the introduction of ICS and appreciated the advantages of home-based rehabilitation. Managers had a clearer vision of ICS than staff on the ground, some of whom felt underprepared to work in the community. There was a consensus that ICS was managing less complex and dependent patients than had been envisaged. CONCLUSION: ICS can provide a feasible adjunct to CH that is acceptable to patients. More work is needed to promote the vision of ICS amongst staff in both community and acute sectors.

Factors with the management of incontinence and promotion of continence in older people in care homes.

AIM: Review of intervention studies of associated factors with incontinence as the primary outcome in older people in care homes to identify and inform practice and future research. BACKGROUND: Incontinence is highly prevalent among care home populations. Previous reviews of descriptive and intervention studies have used urinary incontinence as the primary outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative summary. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches of English empirical studies undertaken using MEDLINE and CINAHL from January 1966-May 2010. All relevant empirical designs were selected from MEDLINE highly sensitive search strings from the Cochrane Incontinence Review Group, modified to exclude surgical and pharmacological studies REVIEW METHODS: The PRISMA statement was followed and established methods for systematic review to produce a narrative summary. RESULTS: Nine studies identified relating to associated factors with the management of incontinence in care homes. Factors included economic data, skin care, exercise studies, staff quality and prompted voiding adherence and the promotion of continence by the management of dehydration and incontinence. CONCLUSION: Managing incontinence and promoting continence in care homes is complex, requiring time and cost-efficient management procedures to contain the problem and deliver quality, achievable care. When developing and designing systems of care in care homes, it is important to also recognize the impact of associated factors. As with any healthcare intervention programme, resources are required to implement the protocols. Economic evaluation studies are limited, with further studies warranted alongside preventative studies to maintain long-term continence in these populations.

Systematic review of care intervention studies for the management of incontinence and promotion of continence in older people in care homes with urinary incontinence as the primary focus (1966-2010).

The aim of this paper was to compare published studies of care interventions for the management and promotion of continence, with urinary incontinence as the primary focus, in older care home residents. Incontinence is a prevalent and serious problem amongst older people in care homes, with an increasing international focus. MEDLINE and CINAHL searches via OVID (January 1966 to May 2010) were carried out, with studies limited to English language publications only. Included in this search were studies investigating urinary and fecal incontinence in people aged 65 years or older in care homes. Studies on surgical or pharmacological interventions or fecal incontinence alone were excluded. A total of 33 interventional studies were identified. Toileting programs and incontinence pads are the mainstays of treatment, with some studies implying significant economic and labor costs. Drug therapy as an adjunct to toileting programs has so far shown only moderate benefits. Combined physical therapy/behavioral therapies have shown effective short-term improvements. Adaptations to physical environment and staff training techniques might also be paramount. Exercise and Functional Incidental Training programs, although expensive, might provide additional benefit by reducing wetness rates and improving appropriate toileting rates. Combined complex behavioral interventions are now a common feature and their effectiveness for the management of urinary incontinence should be determined in future studies. Studies including long-term effectiveness on maintaining continence with full economic evaluation are also warranted in this population.

Long term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of services for urinary symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Given the extent and priority of urinary symptoms there is little evidence available to inform service provision in relation to the long term effects of interventions. This study aims to determine the long term (6 year) clinical effectiveness and costs of a new continence nurse led service compared to standard care for urinary symptoms. METHODS: A long term follow-up study of a 2-arm, non-blinded randomised controlled trial that recruited from a community based population between 1998-2000 in Leicestershire and Rutland UK was undertaken. 3746 men and women aged 40 years and over were followed up from the original trial. The continence nurse practitioner (CNP) intervention comprised a continence service provided by specially trained nurses delivering evidence-based interventions using pre-determined care pathways. The standard care (SC) arm comprised access to existing primary care including General Practitioner and continence advisory services in the area. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Improvement in one or more symptom. Secondary outcomes included: a) Leicester Impact scale; b) patient perception of problem; c) number of symptoms alleviated and cost-effectiveness; all were recorded at long term follow-up (average 6 years) post-randomisation. RESULTS: Overall at long-term follow-up (average 6 years) significantly more individuals in the CNP group (72%) had improved (i.e had fewer symptoms) compared to those in the SC group (67%) (difference of 5% 95% (CI = 0.6 to 9;p = 0.02)). CONCLUSION: The differences in outcome between the two randomised groups shown immediately post treatment had decreased by half in terms of symptom improvement at long term follow-up. Although the difference was statistically significant, the clinical significance may not be, although the direction of the difference favoured the new CNP service.

Urinary diaries: a comparison of data collected for three days versus seven days.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of data recorded in urinary diaries completed for 3 days compared with those completed for 7 days. METHODS: Men and women enrolled in a randomized study of a nurse-led intervention for urinary incontinence were eligible for the study. Participants completed either a 7-day diary or a 3-day diary at baseline and after 8 weeks of the trial intervention. Data quality was assessed by categorizing each day as complete or incomplete. Incomplete days were those with fewer than four entries and those with obvious discrepancies from the rest of the diary days. Data were compared by percentage differences with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight patients completed the 3-day diary, and 40 patients competed the 7-day diary. The majority of the respondents were women. There were more completed 3-day diaries (90.7%) compared with 7-day diaries (50%) (difference 40.7%, 95% CI 28.8-52.6%). When compared with the first 3 days of the 7-day diary, the 3-day diary contained more complete data (90.7% versus 65%; difference 25.7%, 95% CI 14.6-36.9%). These differences were seen in all data types except nocturnal incontinence. There was no evidence of association between diary completion and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that the 7-day diary included less complete data than the 3-day diary, even in the first 3 days of the longer diary. This finding suggests elements of both diary "fatigue" and also diary "despair" may be acting. We would suggest that a 3-day diary is superior in terms of data quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of pelvic floor therapies for urodynamic stress and mixed incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle therapies (PFMT) in women aged > or = 40 years with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) and mixed UI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a three-arm randomized controlled trial in Leicestershire and Rutland UK, 238 community-dwelling women aged > or = 40 years with USI in whom previous primary behavioural intervention had failed were randomized to receive either intensive PFMT (79), vaginal cone therapy (80) or to continue with primary behavioural intervention (79) for 3 months. The main outcome measure was the frequency of primary UI episodes, and secondary measures were pad-test urine loss, patient perception of problem, assessment of PF function, voiding frequency, and pad usage. Validated scales for urinary dysfunction, and impact on quality of life and satisfaction were collected at an independent interview. RESULTS: All three groups had a moderate reduction in UI episodes after intervention but there was no statistically significant difference among the groups. There were marginal improvements in voiding frequency for all groups, with no statistically significant difference among them. CONCLUSIONS: In women who have already had simple behavioural therapies (including advice on PFM exercises) for urinary dysfunction, the continuation of these behavioural therapies can lead to further improvement. The addition of vaginal cone therapy or intensive PFMT does not seem to contribute to further improvement. The improvement in pelvic floor function was significantly greater in the PFMT arm than in the control arm although this did not translate into changes in urinary symptoms.

A survey of help-seeking and treatment provision in women with stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of treatment-seeking in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the extent and type of treatment provision, and the levels of unmet need in women who have and have not accessed care, as SUI in women is common but only a small proportion seek help, and there are reports suggesting that few women receive appropriate treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted in which questionnaires were sent to a random sample of community-dwelling women aged > or = 40 years, registered with participating general practitioners (GPs) and living in Leicestershire. The questionnaires addressed urinary symptoms and their impact on quality of life, and service use in the preceding 12 months; 15 359 questionnaires were mailed and 9340 (60.8%) were returned complete. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 7.7% reported SUI monthly or more often, and 15% of those had sought help. Help-seekers reported more severe symptoms and greater impact on quality of life. Most (78%) had spoken to their GP, and 77% had received some form of treatment or advice, but only 35% had received recommended treatments. The effects on quality of life were not related to treatment provision. CONCLUSIONS: Most women with SUI are treated in primary care; access to appropriate treatments is poor and may, in part, be the cause of the high levels of unmet need observed in this study. Health education interventions may aid appropriate help-seeking and self-care strategies.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new nurse-led continence service: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Continence services in the UK have developed at different rates within differing care models, resulting in scattered and inconsistent services. Consequently, questions remain about the most cost-effective method of delivering these services. AIM: To evaluate the impact of a new service led by a continence nurse practitioner compared with existing primary/secondary care provision for people with urinary incontinence and storage symptoms. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial with a 3- and 6-month follow-up in men and women (n = 3746) aged 40 years and over living in private households (intervention [n = 2958]; control [n = 788]). SETTING: Leicestershire and Rutland, UK. METHOD: The continence nurse practitioner intervention comprised a continence service provided by specially trained nurses delivering evidence-based interventions using predetermined care pathways. They delivered an 8-week primary intervention package that included advice on diet and fluids; bladder training; pelvic floor awareness and lifestyle advice. The standard care arm comprised access to existing primary care including GP and continence advisory services in the area. Outcome measures were recorded at 3 and 6 months post-randomisation. RESULTS: The percentage of individuals who improved (with at least one symptom alleviated) at 3 months was 59% in the intervention group compared with 48% in the standard care group (difference of 11%, 95% CI = 7 to 16; P<0.001) The percentage of people reporting no symptoms or 'cured' was 25% in the intervention group and 15% in the standard care group (difference of 10%, 95% CI = 6 to 13, P = 0.001). At 6 months the difference was maintained. There was a significant difference in impact scores between the two groups at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The continence nurse practitioner-led intervention reduced the symptoms of incontinence, frequency, urgency and nocturia at 3 and 6 months; impact was reduced; and satisfaction with the new service was high.

Effect of a topical diclofenac solution for relieving symptoms of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of osteoarthritis with oral NSAID therapy provides pain relief but carries a substantial risk of adverse effects. Topical NSAID therapy offers an alternative to oral treatment, with the potential for a reduced risk of side effects. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of a topical diclofenac solution in relieving the symptoms of primary osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: We identified 248 men and women from southern Ontario with primary osteoarthritis of the knee and at least moderate pain. The patients were randomly assigned to apply 1 of 3 solutions to their painful knee for 4 weeks: a topical diclofenac solution (1.5% wt/wt diclofenac sodium in a carrier containing dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]); a vehicle-control solution (the carrier containing DMSO but no diclofenac); and a placebo solution (a modified carrier with a token amount of DMSO for blinding purposes but no diclofenac). The primary efficacy end point was pain relief, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) LK3.0 Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale. Secondary end points were improved physical function and reduced stiffness (measured by the WOMAC subscales), reduced pain on walking and patient global assessment (PGA). Safety was evaluated with clinical and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat group the mean change (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) in pain score from baseline to final assessment was significantly greater for the patients who applied the topical diclofenac solution (-3.9 [- 4.8 to -2.9]) than for those who applied the vehicle-control solution (-2.5 [- 3.3 to -1.7]; p = 0.023) or the placebo solution (-2.5 [-3.3 to -1.7]; p = 0.016). For the secondary variables the topical diclofenac solution also revealed superiority to the vehicle-control and placebo solutions, leading to mean changes (and 95% CIs) of -11.6 (-14.7 to -8.4; p = 0.002 and 0.014, respectively) in physical function, -1.5 (-1.9 to -1.1; p = 0.015 and 0.002, respectively) in stiffness and -0.8 (-1.1 to -0.6; p = 0.003 and 0.015, respectively) in pain on walking. The PGA scores were significantly better for the patients who applied the topical diclofenac solution than for those who applied the other 2 solutions (p = 0.039 and 0.025, respectively). The topical diclofenac solution caused some skin irritation, mostly minor local skin dryness, in 30 (36%) of the 84 patients, but this led to discontinuation of treatment in only 5 (6%) of the cases. The incidence of gastrointestinal events did not differ between the treatment groups. No serious gastrointestinal or renal adverse events were reported or detected by means of laboratory testing. INTERPRETATION: This topical diclofenac solution can provide safe, site-specific treatment for osteoarthritic pain, with only minor local skin irritation and minimal systemic side effects.

Objective assessment of urinary incontinence in women: comparison of the one-hour and 24-hour pad tests.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and clinical usefulness of the one-hour and 24-hour pad tests in terms of the relationship with reported symptoms and urodynamic diagnosis. METHODS: 341 women aged 40 years and over reporting lower urinary tract symptoms who were recruited to a nurse led continence service, and went on to receive urodynamics, a one-hour and a 24-hour pad test and completed a urinary diary. RESULTS: For both pad tests, there was a significant difference in the amount of urine leaked between the different urodynamic diagnoses (p<0.0001, for the one-hour and p=0.001 for the 24-hour test). Women with sphincter incompetence leaked significantly more than women with detrusor instability, or those with no abnormality. There was a significant difference between the proportion of women dry on a one-hour pad test and those dry on a 24-hour pad test (26.0% versus 38.4%, difference 12.4%; CI 5.5; 19.4). There is a positive relationship between amount of urine leakage and symptom severity expressed in terms of number of incontinent episodes for both pad tests. CONCLUSION: Both pad tests bore little relationship to the underlying urodynamic diagnosis but there was a positive relationship with symptom severity. The 24-hour pad test appears to be clinically a more useful too than the one-hour test. The two types of pad test are probably assessing incontinence in different ways. We suggest that the minimum data set should include structured questions, diaries and the 24-hour pad test.

Good practice in continence care: development of nurse-led service.

The implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice is often alluded to in the literature; however, the development of these interventions is rarely documented. Within continence care, there is a larger body of relevant literature on which primary clinical interventions can be based. The Leicestershire Medical Research Council (MRC) Incontinence Study is a series of inter-related studies exploring the epidemiology of urinary symptoms, including incontinence, and evaluating service provision and treatment options for these symptoms. This article describes one aspect of the Leicestershire study, namely the development of evidence-based intervention protocols for use in a new nurse-led continence service. This service is currently being evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.