Phase I Study of MEDI3726: A Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with mCRPC after Failure of Abiraterone or Enzalutamide.

PURPOSE: MEDI3726 is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen and carrying a pyrrolobenzodiazepine warhead. This phase I study evaluated MEDI3726 monotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after disease progression on abiraterone and/or enzalutamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MEDI3726 was administered at 0.015-0.3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and MTD/maximum administered dose (MAD). Secondary objectives included assessment of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. The main efficacy endpoint was composite response, defined as confirmed response by RECIST v1.1, and/or PSA decrease of ≥50% after ≥12 weeks, and/or decrease from ≥5 to <5 circulating tumor cells/7.5 mL blood. RESULTS: Between February 1, 2017 and November 13, 2019, 33 patients received MEDI3726. By the data cutoff (January 17, 2020), treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 30 patients (90.9%), primarily skin toxicities and effusions. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 15 patients (45.5%). Eleven patients (33.3%) discontinued because of TRAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient receiving 0.3 mg/kg had a DLT of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The MTD was not identified; the MAD was 0.3 mg/kg. The composite response rate was 4/33 (12.1%). MEDI3726 had nonlinear pharmacokinetics with a short half-life (0.3-1.8 days). The prevalence of antidrug antibodies was 3/32 (9.4%), and the incidence was 13/32 (40.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Following dose escalation, no MTD was identified. Clinical responses occurred at higher doses, but were not durable as patients had to discontinue treatment due to TRAEs.

Patient Selection Strategies to Maximize Therapeutic Index of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Prior Approaches and Future Directions.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are targeted agents that have shown promise in treating cancer. A central challenge in development of ADCs is the relatively narrow therapeutic index observed in clinical studies. Patient selection strategies based on expression of the target in tumors have the potential to maximize benefit and provide the best chance of clinical success; however, implementation of biomarker-driven trials can be difficult both practically and scientifically. We conducted a survey of recent clinical experience from early-phase ADC trials completed between 2000 and 2019 to evaluate the different approaches to patient selection currently being used and assess whether there is evidence that target expression is associated with clinical activity. Our analysis of patient selection strategies indicates that optimal trial design for early-stage trials should be based on multiple factors, including prevalence and heterogeneity of target expression among intent-to-treat patients, as well as biological factors influencing expression of cell surface and soluble target. To ensure a high probability of success, early implementation of patient selection strategies centered around target expression are pivotal to development of ADCs. In this review, we propose a strategic approach that can be applied for optimization of trial design.

Evaluation and use of an anti-cynomolgus monkey CD79b surrogate antibody-drug conjugate to enable clinical development of polatuzumab vedotin.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Polatuzumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) being developed for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It contains a humanized anti-CD79b IgG1 monoclonal antibody linked to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), an anti-mitotic agent. Polatuzumab vedotin binds to human CD79b only. Therefore, a surrogate ADC that binds to cynomolgus monkey CD79b was used to determine CD79b-mediated pharmacological effects in the monkey and to enable first-in-human clinical trials. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Polatuzumab vedotin, the surrogate ADC, and the corresponding antibodies were evaluated in different assays in vitro and in animals. In vitro assessments included binding to peripheral blood mononuclear cells from different species, binding to a human and monkey CD79b-expressing cell line, binding to human Fcγ receptors, and stability in plasma across species. In vivo, ADCs were assessed for anti-tumour activity in mice, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in monkeys, and toxicity in rats and monkeys. KEY RESULTS: Polatuzumab vedotin and surrogate ADC bind with similar affinity to human and cynomolgus monkey B cells, respectively. Comparable in vitro plasma stability, in vivo anti-tumour activity, and mouse pharmacokinetics were also observed between the surrogate ADC and polatuzumab vedotin. In monkeys, only the surrogate ADC showed B-cell depletion and B-cell-mediated drug disposition, but both ADCs showed similar MMAE-driven myelotoxicity, as expected. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The suitability of the surrogate ADC for evaluation of CD79b-dependent pharmacology was demonstrated, and anti-tumour activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and toxicity data with both ADCs supported the entry of polatuzumab vedotin into clinical trials.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Future Directions in Clinical and Translational Strategies to Improve the Therapeutic Index.

Since the first approval of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg; Pfizer; CD33 targeted), two additional antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; CD30 targeted) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa; Pfizer; CD22 targeted), have been approved for hematologic cancers and 1 ADC, trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla; Genentech; HER2 targeted), has been approved to treat breast cancer. Despite a clear clinical benefit being demonstrated for all 4 approved ADCs, the toxicity profiles are comparable with those of standard-of-care chemotherapeutics, with dose-limiting toxicities associated with the mechanism of activity of the cytotoxic warhead. However, the enthusiasm to develop ADCs has not been dampened; approximately 80 ADCs are in clinical development in nearly 600 clinical trials, and 2 to 3 novel ADCs are likely to be approved within the next few years. While the promise of a more targeted chemotherapy with less toxicity has not yet been realized with ADCs, improvements in technology combined with a wealth of clinical data are helping to shape the future development of ADCs. In this review, we discuss the clinical and translational strategies associated with improving the therapeutic index for ADCs.

Anti-CD22 and anti-CD79b antibody-drug conjugates preferentially target proliferating B cells.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CD22 and CD79b are cell-surface receptors expressed on B-cell-derived malignancies such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). An anti-mitotic agent, monomethyl auristatin E, was conjugated to anti-CD22 and anti-CD79b antibodies to develop target-specific therapies for NHL. The mechanism of action (MOA) and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of these antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) were investigated in cynomolgus monkeys. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Animals were administered anti-CD22 or anti-CD79b ADCs, respective unconjugated antibodies or vehicle. Pharmacodynamic effects on total and proliferating B cells and serum PK were then assessed. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) of the ADCs were evaluated in vitro. KEY RESULTS: Depletion of B cells was observed after administration of either ADC or the respective unconjugated antibodies. An extended duration of depletion was observed in animals administered ADCs. Similarly, preferential depletion of proliferating B cells in blood and germinal centre B cells in spleen were only observed in animals administered ADCs. Serum PK profiles of ADCs and respective unconjugated antibodies were comparable. In vitro, anti-human CD22 and anti-human CD79b antibodies showed no or only moderate ADCC activity, respectively; neither antibody had CDC activity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings support the proposed MOA: initial depletion of total B cells by antibody-mediated opsonization, followed by preferential, sustained depletion of proliferating B cells by the auristatin conjugate due to its anti-mitotic action. Delivering potent anti-mitotic agents to B cells via the specificity of monoclonal antibodies provides a means to eliminate pathogenic B cells in NHL with improved risk-benefit profiles over traditional chemotherapeutics.

Etrolizumab as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the ß7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4ß7 and αEß7. We aimed to assess etrolizumab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 study, patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who had not responded to conventional therapy were recruited from 40 referral centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients (aged 18-75 years; Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] of 5 of higher [or ≥6 in USA]; and disease extending 25 cm or more from anal verge) were randomised (1:1:1) to one of two dose levels of subcutaneous etrolizumab (100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, with placebo at week 2; or 420 mg loading dose [LD] at week 0 followed by 300 mg at weeks 2, 4, and 8), or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at week 10, defined as MCS of 2 or less (with no individual subscore of >1), analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; all randomly assigned patients who had received at least one dose of study drug, had at least one post-baseline disease-activity assessment, and had a centrally read screening endoscopic subscore of ≥2). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01336465. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2011, and July 11, 2012, 124 patients were randomly assigned, of whom five had a endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 and were excluded from the mITT population, leaving 39 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group, 39 in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group, and 41 in the placebo group for the primary analyses. No patients in the placebo group had clinical remission at week 10, compared with eight (21% [95% CI 7-36]) patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (p=0·0040) and four (10% [0·2-24]) patients in the 300 mg plus LD group (p=0·048). Adverse events occurred in 25 (61%) of 41 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (five [12%] of which were regarded as serious), 19 (48%) of 40 patients in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group (two [5%] serious), and 31 (72%) of 43 patients in the placebo group (five [12%] serious). INTERPRETATION: Etrolizumab was more likely to lead to clinical remission at week 10 than was placebo. Therefore, blockade of both α4ß7 and αEß7 might provide a unique therapeutic approach for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and phase 3 studies have been planned. FUNDING: Genentech.

DCDT2980S, an anti-CD22-monomethyl auristatin E antibody-drug conjugate, is a potential treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), potent cytotoxic drugs linked to antibodies via chemical linkers, allow specific targeting of drugs to neoplastic cells. We have used this technology to develop the ADC DCDT2980S that targets CD22, an antigen with expression limited to B cells and the vast majority of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). DCDT2980S consists of a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal IgG1 antibody with a potent microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), linked to the reduced cysteines of the antibody via a protease cleavable linker, maleimidocaproyl-valine-citrulline-p-aminobenzoyloxycarbonyl (MC-vc-PAB). We describe the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of DCDT2980S in animal models to assess its potential as a therapeutic for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. We did not find a strong correlation between in vitro or in vivo efficacy and CD22 surface expression, nor a correlation of sensitivity to free drug and in vitro potency. We show that DCDT2980S was capable of inducing complete tumor regression in xenograft mouse models of NHL and can be more effective than rituximab plus combination chemotherapy at drug exposures that were well tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys. These results suggest that DCDT2980S has an efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics profile that support potential treatment of NHL.

A randomised phase I study of etrolizumab (rhuMAb ß7) in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Etrolizumab (rhuMAb ß7, anti-ß7, PRO145223) is a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the ß7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4ß7 and αEß7, which are implicated in leucocyte migration and retention in ulcerative colitis (UC). This randomised phase I study evaluated the safety and pharmacology of etrolizumab in patients with moderate to severe UC. DESIGN: In the single ascending dose (SAD) stage, etrolizumab (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10 mg/kg intravenous, 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) or placebo) was administered 4:1 (n=25) in each cohort. In the multiple dose (MD) stage, new patients received monthly etrolizumab (0.5 mg/kg SC (n=4), 1.5 mg/kg SC (n=5), 3.0 mg/kg SC (n=4), 4.0 mg/kg intravenous (n=5)) or placebo (n=5). The pharmacokinetics was studied and Mayo Clinic Score evaluated at baseline, day 29 (SAD), and days 43 and 71 (MD). RESULTS: In the SAD stage, there were no dose limiting toxicities, infusion or injection site reactions. Two impaired wound healing serious adverse events occurred in two patients receiving etrolizumab. In the MD stage, there were no dose limiting toxicities, and no infusion or injection site reactions. Headache was the most common adverse event, occurring more often in etrolizumab patients. Antietrolizumab antibodies were detected in two subjects. The duration of ß7 receptor full occupancy was dose related. A clinical response was observed in 12/18 patients, and clinical remission in 3/18 patients treated with etrolizumab in the MD stage, compared with 4/5 and 1/5 placebo patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Etrolizumab is well tolerated in moderate to severe UC. Further investigation is warranted.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of pateclizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting lymphotoxin α: results of a phase I randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pateclizumab (MLTA3698A) is a humanized mAb against lymphotoxin α (LTα), a transiently expressed cytokine on activated B and T cells (Th1, Th17), which are implicated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis. This study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, < NOTE: For clarity and per AMA/S-W Style, please restore the use of Oxford/serial commas (ie: David likes vanilla, strawberry, and chocolate ice cream) throughout. and biologic activity of single and multiple doses of intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) pateclizumab in RA patients. METHODS: The single ascending dose (SAD) phase in patients with stable RA consisted of six cohorts (4:1 active:placebo at 0.3 mg/kg IV, 1.0 mg/kg IV, 1.0 mg/kg SC, 3.0 mg/kg IV, 3.0 mg/kg SC, and 5.0 mg/kg IV; n = 5/cohort). In the multiple ascending dose (MAD) phase, patients with prespecified RA disease activity received three doses of pateclizumab or placebo (4:1) every 2 weeks (1.0 mg/kg SC, n = 10; 3.0 mg/kg SC, n = 20; or 5.0 mg/kg IV, n = 5). Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout, and clinical activity was determined after three doses (Week 6). RESULTS: We observed no serious adverse events (AEs) or dose-limiting toxicities, and the majority of AEs were mild to moderate. The pharmacokinetic profiles were linear, and clearance was independent of dose. Reductions in levels of serum CXCL13 were observed, supporting the biologic activity of pateclizumab on the LTα pathway. Patients receiving pateclizumab in the 3.0 mg/kg MAD group (3.0 mg/kg SC) demonstrated ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates at week 6 of 75%, 56% and 25%, respectively, compared with 57%, 29%, and 0% in the placebo group. The median Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein, reduction was 28% for pateclizumab, versus 8.4% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Pateclizumabwas generally well-tolerated in RA patients. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed in active RA patients at the dose level targeted for clinical effect.

In vivo effects of targeting CD79b with antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

Antibodies directed against B cells are in use for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and autoimmune disorders. The B-cell-restricted surface antigen CD79b, a signaling component of the B-cell receptor, has been shown as a promising antibody target in mouse efficacy models of systemic lupus erythematosus. Anti-CD79b antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), cytotoxic drugs linked through specialized chemical linkers to antibodies, are effective in mouse xenograft models of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We were interested in evaluating the systemic effects of anti-CD79b antibodies and ADCs in normal animals as a step toward the development of these molecules as therapeutics. As we were unable to identify any cell surface binding anti-human CD79b antibodies that were cross-reactive to other species, we developed an antibody to cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) CD79b (anti-cyCD79b). The anti-cynomolgus antibody, anti-cyCD79b (10D10), and the maytansine (tubulin inhibitor)-conjugated ADC, anti-cyCD79b (10D10)-MCC-DM1, were administered to cynomolgus monkeys at approximately 30 mg/kg (6,000 microg DM1/m(2)) for two doses 3 weeks apart. Anti-cyCD79b and anti-cyCD79b-MCC-DM1 resulted in peripheral blood B-cell depletion of approximately 65% and approximately 94%, respectively. In addition, anti-cyCD79b-MCC-DM1 resulted in near-complete absence of splenic germinal centers, an observation supporting an effect on dividing B cells. Both molecules were well tolerated, with minimal findings for the antibody and findings for the ADC limited to the lymphoid and hematopoietic systems, liver, and peripheral nerves. These preclinical data suggest that targeting CD79b with antibodies or ADCs may provide safe and effective therapies for B-cell malignancies and autoimmune diseases.

CS1, a potential new therapeutic antibody target for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: We generated a humanized antibody, HuLuc63, which specifically targets CS1 (CCND3 subset 1, CRACC, and SLAMF7), a cell surface glycoprotein not previously associated with multiple myeloma. To explore the therapeutic potential of HuLuc63 in multiple myeloma, we examined in detail the expression profile of CS1, the binding properties of HuLuc63 to normal and malignant cells, and the antimyeloma activity of HuLuc63 in preclinical models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CS1 was analyzed by gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry of multiple myeloma samples and numerous normal tissues. HuLuc63-mediated antimyeloma activity was tested in vitro in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays and in vivo using the human OPM2 xenograft model in mice. RESULTS: CS1 mRNA was expressed in >90% of 532 multiple myeloma cases, regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities. Anti-CS1 antibody staining of tissues showed strong staining of myeloma cells in all plasmacytomas and bone marrow biopsies. Flow cytometric analysis of patient samples using HuLuc63 showed specific staining of CD138+ myeloma cells, natural killer (NK), NK-like T cells, and CD8+ T cells, with no binding detected on hematopoietic CD34+ stem cells. HuLuc63 exhibited significant in vitro ADCC using primary myeloma cells as targets and both allogeneic and autologous NK cells as effectors. HuLuc63 exerted significant in vivo antitumor activity, which depended on efficient Fc-CD16 interaction as well as the presence of NK cells in the mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that HuLuc63 eliminates myeloma cells, at least in part, via NK-mediated ADCC and shows the therapeutic potential of targeting CS1 with HuLuc63 for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Modified representational difference analysis: isolation of differentially expressed mRNAs from rare cell populations.

Representational difference analysis of cDNAs (cDNA-RDA) is a sensitive subtractive hybridization technique capable of isolating rare mRNAs differentially expressed in two cell populations. cDNA-RDA can detect sequences represented at 0.0001% in the starting mRNA. By using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cDNA-RDA also lends itself to studies in which samples are derived from limited numbers of cells. Standard cDNA-RDA protocols depend upon the presence of specific restriction enzyme sites in each cDNA, typically enzymes with four base recognition sequences. These sites are used to reduce the cDNA size range and provide primer sites for subsequent PCR amplification. Consequently, transcripts containing fewer than two of the chosen restriction sites are undetectable by cDNA-RDA. We have developed a restriction enzyme site-independent cDNA-RDA protocol called modified RDA (MRDA). We constructed MRDA test sequences from random hexamer-primed cDNA, thereby increasing the representation of mRNAs which are excluded by cDNA-RDA protocols. MRDA is also more efficient than cDNA-RDA at removing highly expressed housekeeping genes during the subtractive hybridization process, thereby allowing more efficient isolation of preferentially expressed mRNAs. Using MRDA, we isolated cDNAs differentially expressed between limited numbers of human CD4(+) naive and memory T lymphocyte subsets and skin- and gut-homing memory T cell subsets.