Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Air Med J ; 39(5): 414-416, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012482

ABSTRACT

This case describes the use of tranexamic acid as an adjunctive treatment in the management of a pediatric patient in hemorrhagic shock. The case also highlights other components of current best practices for hemorrhagic shock in children, including bleeding source control and prompt resuscitation with blood products. A 20-month old male suffered an agricultural accident with significant injury to the right upper extremity. This led to subsequent extremity hemorrhage and clinical evidence of hemorrhagic shock. As a result of interventions performed by emergency medical services as well as the helicopter emergency medical services team, including the application of a tourniquet, prehospital blood product administration, and tranexamic acid administration, the patient had hemodynamically stabilized by arrival at the level 1 pediatric trauma center and was neurologically intact when discharged from the hospital.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Medical Services , Farms , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Accidental Injuries , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Infant , Male
2.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 13(1): 20-4, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24526147

ABSTRACT

Of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), approximately two thirds present to a hospital not capable of percutaneous coronary intervention. Transfer to a STEMI-receiving center delays time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI, but factors that affect this delay have not been well studied. We performed a 3-round modified Delphi study to identify system practices that minimize transfer time to a STEMI-receiving center. A comprehensive literature review was used to identify candidate system practices. Emergency medical services, emergency medicine, and cardiology experts were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement that a variable was "very important (5)" or "important (4)" with a mean score ≥ 4.25 or 80% agreement that a variable was "not important (1)" or "somewhat important (2)" with a mean score ≤ 1.75. In round 1, participants rated the candidate items and suggested additional items. Individual feedback was provided, and participants discussed items via conference calls before rating them again in round 2. In round 3, participants ranked the consensus items from rounds 1-2 from most to least important, and the mean score for each item was calculated. Of the 98 experts invited, 29 participated in round 1, 22 in round 2, and 14 in round 3. Participants identified 18 system practices that they agree are critical in minimizing transfer time to STEMI-receiving centers, with the most important being performance of a prehospital electrocardiogram and having established transfer protocols. These factors should be considered in the development of STEMI systems of care.


Subject(s)
Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Cardiology Service, Hospital/standards , Consensus , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Transfer/standards , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...