Metabolic and inflammatory risk reduction in response to lipid-lowering and lifestyle modification in the medically underserved individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Medically underserved (US) populations have an increased level of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, however, few studies investigated ASCVD risk reduction in US. METHODS: Of 217 subjects with ApoB ≥120 mg/dL and carotid atherosclerosis (≥15% stenosis by ultrasound) enrolled in the Carotid Plaque Composition by MRI (CPC) study between 2005 and 2011, US (n=33) was defined as those without adequate healthcare insurance, while AS (n=184) included those with adequate healthcare coverage. All subjects received atorvastatin-based lipid therapies and lifestyle intervention for 2 years. Metabolic and inflammatory risk factors were compared between AS and US. RESULTS: At baseline, compared to AS, US displayed higher levels of metabolic and inflammatory risk including systolic blood pressure (140±27 vs. 131±18 mmHg, p=0.04), fasting glucose (125±59 vs. 102±22 mg/dL, p=0.03) and fasting insulin (39±33 vs. 28±20 µU/dL, p=0.03) which resulted in higher insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 2.2±0.4 vs. 1.3±0.1, p=0.03), and hsCRP (5.6±1.5 vs. 2.8±0.2 mg/L, p=0.03). Over 2 years of intervention, US and AS showed similar reductions in LDL-C (-10.7% vs. -16% per year, p=0.2), triglycerides (-16.7% vs. -15.9% per year, p=0.4), and hsCRP (-0.11% vs. -0.04% per year, p=0.1). However, US continued to show significantly higher levels of fasting blood glucose (115±6.0 vs. 101±2.0 mg/dL, p=0.03) and HOMA-IR (1.9±0.2 vs. 1.5±0.1, p=0.047), and hsCRP (3.9±0.7 vs. 1.9±0.2 mg/L, p<0.001) than AS following 2 years of interventions. CONCLUSIONS: US displayed higher ASCVD risk than AS at baseline and over 2 years despite similar reductions following the intervention. These findings highlight the unmet needs for improved intervention strategies and implementation methods for ASCVD risk reduction in US. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00715273 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Effects of adding extended-release niacin and colesevelam to statin therapy on lipid levels in subjects with atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND: The use of combination therapies is needed to treat dyslipidemia in patients with both elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). We conducted a study to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with statin plus extended-release (ER) niacin and colesevelam, aimed at lowering LDL-C and raising HDL-C, in subjects with atherosclerotic disease. METHODS: This 1-year study randomized 123 subjects with atherosclerotic disease to atorvastatin alone, double therapy with atorvastatin plus ER niacin, or triple therapy with atorvastatin, plus ER niacin and colesevelam. Target LDL-C was ≤80 mg/dL for single and double therapy, and ≤60 mg/dL for triple therapy. Target HDL-C was an increase of ≥10 mg/dL for double and triple therapy. RESULTS: Single therapy, with mean atorvastatin dose 30 mg/day, had a 47% reduction in LDL-C (P < 0.001) from 148 ± 29 mg/dL to 77 ± 15 mg/dL. With the addition of ER niacin, the double therapy had a 25% increase in HDL-C, from 42 ± 11 mg/dL to 53 ± 16 mg/dL (P < 0.001). The triple therapy decreased LDL-C by 57%, from 157 ± 29 mg/dL to 66 ± 18 mg/dL (P < 0.001), and increased HDL-C by 29%, from 40 ± 9 mg/dL to 50 ± 14 mg/dL (P < 0.001). Double and triple therapy required a lower atorvastatin dose of 20 mg/day to reach the target LDL-C levels. On average, 75% and 67% of subjects reached the predefined LDL-C and HDL-C treatment targets. No related myopathy or hepatotoxicity required stopping the therapy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that combination therapy with atorvastatin plus ER niacin and colesevelam can safely and effectively treat dyslipidemia in subjects with atherosclerotic disease.