FAIR assessment tools: evaluating use and performance.

Publishing research data using a findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) approach is paramount to further innovation in many areas of research. In particular in developing innovative approaches to predict (eco)toxicological risks in (nano or advanced) material design where efficient use of existing data is essential. The use of tools assessing the FAIRness of data helps the future improvement of data FAIRness and therefore their re-use. This paper reviews ten FAIR assessment tools that have been evaluated and characterized using two datasets from the nanomaterials and microplastics risk assessment domain. The tools were grouped into four categories: online and offline self-assessment survey based, online (semi-) automated and other tools. We found that the online self-assessment tools can be used for a quick scan of a user's dataset due to their ease of use, little need for experience and short time investment. When a user is looking to assess full databases, and not just datasets, for their FAIRness, (semi-)automated tools are more practical. The offline assessment tools were found to be limited and unreliable due to a lack of guidance and an under-developed state. To further characterize the usability, two datasets were run through all tools to check the similarity in the tools' results. As most of the tools differ in their implementation of the FAIR principles, a large variety in outcomes was obtained. Furthermore, it was observed that only one tool gives recommendations to the user on how to improve the FAIRness of the evaluated dataset. This paper gives clear recommendations for both the user and the developer of FAIR assessment tools.

On the use of 1H and 13C 1D NMR spectra as QSPR descriptors.

Recently, 1D NMR and IR spectra have been proposed as descriptors containing 3D information. And, as such, said to be suitable for making QSAR and QSPR models where 3D molecular geometries matter, for example, in binding affinities. This paper presents a study on the predictive power of 1D NMR spectra-based QSPR models using simulated proton and carbon 1D NMR spectra. It shows that the spectra-based models are outperformed by models based on theoretical molecular descriptors and that spectra-based models are not easy to interpret. We therefore conclude that the use of such NMR spectra offers no added value.

Method for the computational comparison of crystal structures.

A new method for assessing the similarity of crystal structures is described. A similarity measure is important in classification and clustering problems in which the crystal structures are the source of information. Classification is particularly important for the understanding of properties of crystals, while clustering can be used as a data reduction step in polymorph prediction. The method described uses a radial distribution function that combines atomic coordinates with partial atomic charges. The descriptor is validated using experimental data from a classification study of clathrate structures of cephalosporins and data from a polymorph prediction run. In both cases, excellent results were obtained.