The association between HTR2C polymorphisms and obesity in psychiatric patients using antipsychotics: a cross-sectional study.

The use of antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of obesity. This consideration makes it important to search for determinants that can predict the risk for antipsychotic-induced obesity. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated whether polymorphisms in the HTR2C gene were associated with obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) in patients using antipsychotics. We examined polymorphisms in the promoter region of the HTR2C gene ((HTR2C:c.1-142948(GT)n, rs3813928 (-997 G/A), rs3813929 (-759 C/T), rs518147 (-697 G/C)) and an intragenic polymorphism (rs1414334:C>G). The results of the logistic regression were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR). In total, we included 127 patients mainly diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (89%). The results indicate that a combined genotype carrying the variant HTR2C:c.1-142948(GT)n 13 repeat allele, the common allele rs3813929 C, the variant allele rs518147 C and the variant allele rs1414334 C is significantly related to an increased risk of obesity (OR 3.71 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-11.12)).

The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease.

The concurrent validity of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) against the DSM-IV diagnosis 'depressive disorder' was assessed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Sixty-three non-demented Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients who attended the outpatient department of an academic hospital were diagnosed according to a standardised research protocol. This protocol consisted of the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) to establish the presence or absence of 'depressive disorder' according to the DSM-IV criteria, as well as the HAMD-17 and the MADRS. Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (ROC curves) were obtained and the positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for different cut-off scores. Maximum discrimination between depressed and non-depressed patients was reached at a cut-off score of 13/14 for the HAMD-17, and at 14/15 for the MADRS. At lower cut-offs, like 11/12 for the HAMD-17 and 14/15 for the MADRS, the high sensitivity and NPV make these scales good screening instruments. At higher cut-offs, such as 16/17 for the HAMD-17 and 17/18 for the MADRS, the high specificity and PPV make these instruments good diagnostic instruments. The diagnostics performance of the HAMD-17 is slightly better than that of the MADRS. This study shows that it is justified to use the HAMD-17 and the MADRS to measure depressive symptoms in both non-depressed and depressed PD patients, to diagnose depressive disorder in PD, and to dichotomize patient samples into depressed and non-depressed groups.

Disturbances of affective prosody in patients with schizophrenia; a cross sectional study.

The objective was to determine whether disturbances of affective prosody constitute part of the symptomatology of schizophrenia. Affective prosody is defined here as a neuropsychological function that encompasses all non-verbal aspects of language that are necessary for recognising and conveying emotions in communication. Twenty six schizophrenic outpatients and twenty four normal controls underwent a standardised prosody test, assessing four different aspects of affective prosody: spontaneous prosody, prosodic recognition, prosodic repetition, and facial affect recognition. Patients scored significantly worse than controls on three of the four subtests: spontaneous prosody, prosodic recognition, and prosodic repetition. There were no significant differences on a subtest for facial affect recognition. Differences in educational level between patients and controls could not account for these differences.

The structure of common psychiatric symptoms: how many dimensions of neurosis?

In order to replicate and elaborate the two-dimensional model of depression and anxiety underlying the structure of common psychiatric symptoms proposed by Goldberg et al. (1987), we carried out latent trait analyses on PSE symptom data of the original Manchester study and two recent Dutch studies. We used the same analytical strategy as Goldberg et al. to facilitate comparison with the earlier work. It was found that a more comprehensive set of common psychiatric symptoms caused an extra, third dimension to emerge, so that the earlier anxiety dimension became split between a specific anxiety axis characterized by situational and phobic anxiety and avoidance, and a non-specific anxiety axis characterized by free-floating anxiety, various symptoms relating to tension, irritability and restlessness. It is argued that three dimensions are sufficient to account for the covariance between common psychiatric symptoms. A fairly consistent correlation between the non-specific anxiety and the depression dimension was found across sites, as well as independence of the specific anxiety dimension from the other two dimensions. Furthermore, the depression dimension was robust with similar symptom profiles across samples, but there appeared to be local differences in the structure of anxiety symptoms.

Recognition, management and outcome of psychological disorders in primary care: a naturalistic follow-up study.

This article addresses the issues of recognition and labelling of psychological disorders (PDs) by general practitioners (GPs), and the association of recognition with management and outcome. Nearly 2000 attenders of 25 GPs were screened with the GHQ and a stratified sample of 296 patients was examined twice, using the Present State Examination (PSE) and Groningen Social Disability Schedule (GSDS). Prevalence rates of PDs according to the GHQ, GP and PSE were 46%, 26% and 15% respectively. For the 1450 'new' patients, i.e. patients who had no PD diagnosed by their GP in the 12 months prior to the enrollment visit, these rates were 38%, 14%, and 10%. GPs missed half of the PSE cases and typically assigned non-specific diagnoses to recognized cases. Depressions were more readily recognized than anxiety disorders, and the detection rates for severe disorders were higher than those for less severe disorders. Recognition was strongly associated with management and outcome. Recognized as compared to non-recognized cases were more likely to receive mental health interventions from their GP and had better outcomes in terms of both psychopathology and social functioning. Initial severity, psychological reasons for encounter, recency of onset, diagnostic category, and psychiatric comorbidity were related to both better recognition and outcome. However, these variables could not account for the association of recognition with management and outcome, but some did modify the association. A causal model of the relationships is presented and possible reasons for non-recognition and for the beneficial effects of recognition are discussed.

Polytomous logistic regression analysis of the General Health Questionnaire and the Present State Examination.

First, two examples of dichotomous logistic regression analysis are presented. The probability of being a psychiatric case according to the Present State Examination is predicted from the total score on the General Health Questionnaire and from the general practitioner's judgement on the presence of a mental health problem. Subjects were 292 primary care attenders. Results are compared with those from prior studies. Next, the extension to the polytomous case is demonstrated. The probability of being at any given level of the Index of Definition (computed from PSE data) is estimated from the General Health Questionnaire total score by an ordered polytomous logistic regression model. Several applications of the polytomous logistic regression model are discussed. These range from estimating the proportion of psychiatric cases among individuals who refuse to be interviewed to the formulation of sampling schemes which can be expected to reduce costs while at the same time yielding optimal information for testing specific hypotheses.

General practitioners' characteristics and the assessment of psychiatric illness.

We put forward the hypothesis that general practitioners (GPs) with a family medicine orientation are more sensitive to the presence of mental health problems than GPs with a clinical orientation. To test it, GPs were divided into three subgroups on the basis of an attitude questionnaire. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Present State Examination (PSE) were used as criteria. No differences in sensitivity to psychiatric illness were observed using either scale. Results of factor analysis with the subscales of the GP attitude questionnaire and the indices 'bias' and 'accuracy' were similar to those reported by GOLDBERG and associates. 'New' patients were defined as patients in whom the GP had not identified a mental health problem (MHP) in the past year. 'Old' patients were defined as 'not new'. GPs tended to under-identify MHPs in 'new' and over-identify them in 'old' patients. Recognition of psychiatric illness was better in 'old' than in 'new' patients. In 'new' patients, recognition depended on psychiatric diagnosis. Among 'old' patients, older people and people (especially women) with low education predominated. In their assessments GPs used information not contained in the GHQ.

On the assumption of equality of variance-covariance matrices in the sex and racial diagnosis of human skulls.

Many papers have been devoted to the assumption of equality of variance-covariance matrices (sigma g) with respect to the use of discriminant analysis. Most of them concentrate on the "effect" of inequality on the results, in particular on discriminant functions. In the present paper, the assumption of equality of covariances itself was investigated for measures on human skulls. Data for both sexes were compared, as well as data on several racial groups. A likelihood ratio test was used. It was concluded that the equality of sigma g between the sexes and among subraces was not questioned, whereas the results warrant some caution as to the equality of sigma g among the main racial groups.