Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated results, including overall survival, from PROFILE 1001.

BACKGROUND: In the ongoing phase I PROFILE 1001 study, crizotinib showed antitumor activity in patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present updated antitumor activity, overall survival (OS) and safety data (additional 46.2 months follow-up) for patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC from PROFILE 1001. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ROS1 status was determined by FISH or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. All patients received crizotinib at a starting dose of 250 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received crizotinib, with a median duration of treatment of 22.4 months. At data cut-off, treatment was ongoing in 12 patients (23%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 58% to 83%], including six confirmed complete responses and 32 confirmed partial responses; 10 patients had stable disease. Responses were durable (median duration of response 24.7 months; 95% CI, 15.2-45.3). ORRs were consistent across different patient subgroups. Median progression-free survival was 19.3 months (95% CI, 15.2-39.1). A total of 26 deaths (49%) occurred (median follow-up period of 62.6 months), and of the remaining 27 patients (51%), 14 (26%) were in follow-up at data cut-off. Median OS was 51.4 months (95% CI, 29.3 to not reached) and survival probabilities at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 79%, 67%, 53%, and 51%, respectively. No correlation was observed between OS and specific ROS1 fusion partner. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly grade 1 or 2, per CTCAE v3.0. There were no grade ≥4 TRAEs and no TRAEs associated with permanent discontinuation. No new safety signals were reported with long-term crizotinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings serve as a new benchmark for OS in ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC, and continue to show the clinically meaningful benefit and safety of crizotinib in this molecular subgroup. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00585195.

Correlation of extent of ALK FISH positivity and crizotinib efficacy in three prospective studies of ALK-positive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: In clinical trials of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib, evaluation of the relationship between the percentage of ALK-positive cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-particularly near the cut-off defining positive status-and clinical outcomes have been limited by small sample sizes. Patients and methods: Data were pooled from three large prospective trials (one single-arm and two randomized versus chemotherapy) of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC determined by Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH using a cut-off of ≥15% ALK-positive cells. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression analyses were used to explore the association of percent ALK-positive cells with objective response and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Results: Of 11 081 screened patients, 1958 (18%) were ALK positive, 7512 (68%) were ALK negative, and 1540 (14%) were uninformative. Median percentage of ALK-positive cells was 58% in ALK-positive patients and 2% in ALK-negative patients. Of ALK-positive patients, 5% had 15%-19% ALK-positive cells; of ALK-negative patients, 2% had 10%-14% ALK-positive cells. Objective response rate for ALK-positive, crizotinib-treated patients with ≥20% ALK-positive cells was 56% (n = 700/1246), 55% (n = 725/1312) for those with ≥15% ALK-positive cells, and 38% for those with 15%-19% ALK-positive cells (n = 25/66). As a continuous variable, higher percentages of ALK-positive cells were estimated to be associated with larger differences in objective response and PFS between crizotinib and chemotherapy; however, tests for interaction between treatment and percentage of ALK-positive cells were not significant (objective response, P = 0.054; PFS, P = 0.17). Conclusions: Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC benefit from treatment with crizotinib across the full range of percentage of ALK-positive cells, supporting the clinical utility of the 15% cut-off. The small number of patients with scores near the cut-off warrant additional study given the potential for misclassification of ALK status due to technical or biologic reasons.

Current status of targeted therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

The identification of chromosomal rearrangements involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in ~3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and the demonstration that the first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib, can effectively target these tumors represent a significant advance in the evolution of personalized medicine for NSCLC. Single-arm studies demonstrating rapid and durable responses in the majority of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib have been followed by a randomized phase III clinical trial in which superiority of crizotinib over chemotherapy was seen in previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, despite the initial responses, most patients develop acquired resistance to crizotinib. Several novel therapeutic approaches targeting ALK-positive NSCLC are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, including second-generation ALK inhibitors, such as LDK378, CH5424802 (RO5424802802), and AP26113, and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors.

Phase I study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered in 3-week cycles (Schedule 2/1).

BACKGROUND: This phase I, open-label, first-in-human study determined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PD 0332991, an oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor with potent anti-proliferative activity in vitro/vivo. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with retinoblastoma protein-positive advanced solid tumours or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma refractory to standard therapy or for which no therapy was available received PD 0332991 once daily (QD) for 14 days followed by 7 days off treatment (21-day cycles; Schedule 2/1). RESULTS: Six patients had DLTs (18%; four receiving 200 mg QD; two receiving 225 mg QD); the MTD was 200 mg QD. Treatment-related, non-haematological adverse events occurred in 29 patients (88%) during cycle 1 and 27 patients (82%) thereafter. Adverse events were generally mild-moderate. Of 31 evaluable patients, one with testicular cancer achieved a partial response; nine had stable disease (≥10 cycles in three cases). PD 0332991 was slowly absorbed (mean T(max) 4.2 h) and eliminated (mean half-life 26.7 h). Volume of distribution was large (mean 3241 l) with dose-proportional exposure. Using a maximum effective concentration model, neutropenia was proportional to exposure. CONCLUSION: PD 0332991 was generally well tolerated, with DLTs related mainly to myelosuppression. The MTD, 200 mg QD, is recommended for phase II study.

Pharmacokinetics/genotype associations for major cytochrome P450 enzymes in native and first- and third-generation Japanese populations: comparison with Korean, Chinese, and Caucasian populations.

Application of foreign clinical data across geographic regions can accelerate drug development. Drug disposition can be variable, and identification of factors influencing responsible pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenomic approaches could facilitate the universal application of foreign data and reduce the total amount of phase III clinical trials evaluating risks in different populations. Our objective was to establish and compare genotype (major cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes)/phenotype associations for Japanese (native and first- and third-generation Japanese living abroad), Caucasian, Chinese, and Korean populations using a standard drug panel. The mean metabolic ratios (MRs) for the four ethnic groups were similar except for a lower activity of CYP2D6 in Caucasians and CYP2C19 in Asians. Genotype, not ethnicity, impacted the MR for CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6; neither affected CYP1A2, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 activities. We conclude that equivalent plasma drug concentrations and metabolic profiles can be expected for native Japanese, first- and third-generation Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese for compounds handled through these six CYP enzymes.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy young (18-45 years) men and women, and healthy elderly (> or = 65 years) men and women. METHODS: Eight young men, 11 young women, 8 elderly men and 8 elderly women were given oral ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), in two evenly divided daily doses, for 7 days, followed by a single 20 mg dose on day 8. Serum samples were collected immediately before the morning dose on days 1-8, for up to 12 h after dosing on day 1 and for up to 96 h after dosing on day 8. The resulting data were used to derive pharmacokinetic parameters of ziprasidone in each age and gender group. RESULTS: Steady-state serum concentrations of ziprasidone were achieved within 2-3 days. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone, determined 8 days after the initiation of treatment, were similar in the young men, elderly men and young women. Assessment of gender effects by analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in Cmax (85 vs. 69 ng ml(-1) and tmax (3.19 vs. 4.81 h) but no differences in AUC(0,12 h) or lambda(z). Assessment of age effects by analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in AUC(0,12 h) (560 vs. 465 ng ml(-1) h), Cmax (85 vs. 69 ng ml(-1) and lambda(z) (0.126 vs. 0.197 l h(-1) but no difference in tmax. Assessment of age and gender effects by analysis of covariance, with body weight as the covariate, did not reveal any significant differences. The mean t(1/2), z in the young men, young women, elderly men and elderly women were 3.1, 4.1, 5.7 and 5.3 h, respectively. Standard deviations of the means for the pharmacokinetic parameters for the elderly women tended to be large. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone is not clinically significant.

The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in subjects with normal and impaired hepatic function.

AIMS: To assess whether hepatic impairment influences the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone. METHODS: Thirty subjects with normal hepatic function or a primary diagnosis of clinically significant cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A or B) were enrolled into an open-label, multicentre, multiple-dose study. The subjects with chronic, stable hepatic impairment and the matched control subjects received ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), given orally with food, as two divided daily doses for 4 days and a single 20 mg dose on the morning of day 5. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined from multiple venous blood samples collected on days 1 and 5. Liver function was evaluated quantitatively using antipyrine. RESULTS: On day 1 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0,12 h), Cmax, tmax) of ziprasidone between the two groups. On day 5 there were no statistically significant differences in the Cmax or tmax for ziprasidone between the two groups. The mean AUC(0,12 h) for ziprasidone was statistically significantly greater in the hepatically impaired subjects compared with the normal subjects (590 ng ml(-1) h vs. 467 ng ml(-1) h, P = 0. 042). However, the AUC(0,12 h) increased by only 26% in the cirrhotic group compared with the matched control group. The ziprasidone lambda(z) in the subjects with normal hepatic function was statistically significantly greater than that in the hepatically impaired subjects (P<0.001). There was no correlation between antipyrine lambda(z) and ziprasidone lambda(z) in the subjects with normal hepatic function or in those with hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that mild to moderate hepatic impairment does not result in clinically significant alteration of ziprasidone pharmacokinetics.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone under non-fasting conditions in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple oral doses of ziprasidone in healthy male volunteers, and to determine the influence of ziprasidone on serum prolactin levels. METHODS: Single and multiple doses of ziprasidone were given orally (as two divided daily doses), at fixed dosages of 10 and 40 mg day(-1), and using titrated regimens of 40-80 and 40-120 mg day(-1), for 14 days. All dosages were taken immediately after food. The study adopted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Prolactin response, sedative properties, tolerability, and extrapyramidal symptoms were also investigated. RESULTS: Steady-state exposure to ziprasidone was attained after 1 day of dosing. Mean Cmax and AUC(0,12 h) increased with increasing dose, with apparent dose-proportionality between the 20 and 60 mg dose levels. Trough-to-peak ratios at steady state ranged from 2 to 5. Accumulation ratios for the fixed-dose regimens were 1.49 and 1.48 at the 5 and 20 mg dose levels, respectively. Ziprasidone was associated with transient prolactin elevation but levels of prolactin returned to baseline within the dosing interval at steady state. There was a marginal, transient increase in serum prolactin levels which was not dose-related at the 80 and 120 mg day(-1) doses, and which was noted to attenuate with chronic dosing. Ziprasidone was generally well tolerated. The most frequent side-effect was mild or moderate headache. A minority of patients suffered first-dose postural hypotension. Ziprasidone was also associated with a mild sedative effect that became less pronounced as treatment continued. There were no drug-related changes in electrocardiogram or clinical laboratory variables that were of clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone is characterized by a predictable pharmacokinetic profile resulting in symptoms that reflect its pharmacological action.

The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

AIMS: To assess whether renal impairment influences the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone, and to determine whether ziprasidone is cleared via haemodialysis. METHODS: Thirty-nine subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment were enrolled into an open-label, multicentre, multiple-dose study and assigned to four groups according to their renal function: normal (group 1, creatinine clearance > 70 ml min(-1); mildly impaired (group 2, creatinine clearance 30-60 ml min(-1); moderately impaired (group 3, creatinine clearance 10-29 ml min(-1), and severely impaired (group 4, requiring haemodialysis three times-a-week). Subjects received ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), given orally with food, as two divided daily doses for 7 days and a single 20 mg dose on the morning of day 8. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined from multiple venous blood samples collected on days 1 and 8 (haemodialysis day for subjects with severe renal impairment). Additional samples were collected from subjects with severe renal impairment on day 7 (nonhaemodialysis day). RESULTS: On day 1 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0, 12 h), Cmax, tmax) of ziprasidone among subjects with normal renal function and those with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. The AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax in subjects with mildly impaired renal function were statistically significantly greater than in those with moderately impaired renal function (P = 0.0163-0.0385). The mean AUC(0,12 h) was 272, 370, 250 and 297 ng ml(-1) h in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Corresponding mean Cmax values were 47, 61, 41 and 50 ng ml(-1) and corresponding mean tmax values were 5, 6, 5 and 5 h. On day 8 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0,12 h), Cmax, tmax, lambda(z), Fb) of ziprasidone among subjects with normal renal function and those with moderate or severe renal impairment. The AUC(0,12 h) in subjects with mild renal impairment was statistically significantly greater than those in the other three groups (P = 0.0025-0.0221), but this was not considered clinically significant. The mean AUC(0,12 h) were 446, 650, 389 and 427 ng ml(-1) h in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Corresponding mean Cmax values were 68, 93, 54 and 70 ng ml(-1), corresponding mean tmax values were 4, 5, 4 and 5 h and corresponding mean lambda(z) were 0.14, 0.11, 0.14 and 0.17 h(-1). The mean percentage Fb was 99.84-99.88% across all groups and the mean t(1/2),z ranged from 4.2 to 6.4 h. Comparison of the mean AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax values in subjects with severe renal impairment on day 7 with those on day 8 suggested that haemodialysis does not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that mild-to-moderate impairment of renal function does not result in clinically significant alteration of ziprasidone pharmacokinetics and therefore does not necessitate dose adjustment.

Ziprasidone and the activity of cytochrome P450 2D6 in healthy extensive metabolizers.

AIMS: To determine whether ziprasidone alters the metabolizing activity of the 2D6 isoenzyme of cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6). METHODS: Twenty-four healthy young subjects aged 18-45 years were screened for CYP2D6 metabolizing activity and shown to be extensive metabolizers of dextromethorphan. These subjects were then randomized to receive a single dose of ziprasidone 80 mg, paroxetine 20 mg or placebo, 2 h before receiving a dose of dextromethorphan. Urine samples for the determination of dextromethorphan concentrations were collected over the 8 h period following dextromethorphan dosing, and used for the determination of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios. Blood samples were collected immediately before and up to 10 h after the administration of ziprasidone or paroxetine, and used to derive pharmacokinetic parameters of ziprasidone and paroxetine. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes in the urinary dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratio in the ziprasidone group or the placebo group. By contrast, there was a 10-fold increase in the urinary dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratio in the paroxetine group and this differed significantly from those in the ziprasidone and placebo groups (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that ziprasidone does not inhibit the clearance of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6.

The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy volunteers treated with cimetidine or antacid.

AIMS: To evaluate the effects of cimetidine and Maalox(R) (aluminium hydroxide 1.35 g and magnesium hydroxide 1.2 g) on the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone. METHODS: Eleven healthy young subjects aged 18-45 years were given single oral doses of ziprasidone 40 mg on three occasions at least 7 days apart. On one occasion ziprasidone was administered alone, on another occasion ziprasidone was co-administered with oral cimetidine 800 mg and on a third occasion ziprasidone was co-administered with oral Maalox(R). RESULTS: The administration of cimetidine increased the ziprasidone AUC(0,infinity) by 6% but there were no statistically significant differences in Cmax, tmax or lambda(z) between the ziprasidone+cimetidine group and the ziprasidone group. The administration of Maalox did not produce any statistically significant differences in AUC(0,infinity), Cmax, tmax or lambda(z) between the ziprasidone+Maalox group and the ziprasidone group. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone are not affected by concurrent administration of cimetidine or Maalox. This suggests that other nonspecific inhibitors of cytochrome P450 and antacids are unlikely to alter the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone.

The effects of ziprasidone on steady-state lithium levels and renal clearance of lithium.

AIMS: To assess the potential of ziprasidone to alter the renal clearance and steady-state serum levels of lithium. METHODS: Healthy subjects who had stable serum lithium levels during the first 7 days of treatment with lithium 900 mg day(-1), given as two divided daily doses, were randomized to receive concomitant treatment with either ziprasidone, 40 mg day(-1), given as two divided daily doses, on days 9-11 followed by 80 mg day(-1), given as two divided daily doses on days 12-15 (n = 12), or placebo twice daily (n = 13). Ziprasidone or placebo was administered 2 h before each dose of lithium. RESULTS: Ziprasidone administration was associated with a 0.07 mmol l(-1) (13%) mean increase in steady-state serum lithium levels compared with a mean increase of 0.06 mmol l(-1) (10%) with placebo. Mean renal clearance of lithium decreased by 0.09 l h(-1) (5%) in the ziprasidone group and by 0.14 l h(-1) (9%) in the placebo group. None of these differences between the two groups was statistically or clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone does not alter steady-state serum lithium concentrations or renal clearance of lithium.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CP-101,606 in patients with a mild or moderate traumatic brain injury.

CP-101,606 is a postsynaptic antagonist of the glutamate-mediated NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. When administered intravenously (i.v.) at the time of injury, CP-101,606 is neuroprotective in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and ischemia. Minimal adverse effects have been observed in normal human volunteers given i.v. doses of up to 3 mg/kg/hr for 72 hours. The objective of the present clinical trial was to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of CP-101,606 infused for various times in patients who had suffered either an acute moderate or mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Score 9-14) or hemorrhagic stroke. Patients began receiving treatment within 12 hours of brain injury. A total of 53 subjects (45 with TBI and 8 with stroke) were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive CP-101,606 or placebo (4 drug: 1 placebo). Drug/placebo was administered by i.v. infusion (0.75 mg/kg/hr) for 2 hours and then stopped (n = 25) or continued for 22 hours (n = 4) or 70 hours (n = 24) at a rate of 0.37 mg/kg/hr. Mean plasma drug concentrations were well above the predicted therapeutic concentration of 200 ng/ml within two hours of initiating treatment and were sustained as long as drug was infused. All the patients tolerated their drug/placebo treatment, and there were no clinically significant cardiovascular or hematological abnormalities in either group. A Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, used to detect personality changes and behavioral disturbances, indicated that all subjects showed an improvement from their postinjury, predosing baseline but did not significantly differ from each other with respect to type of head injury and/or treatment with drug or placebo. Modified Kurtzke Scoring also showed a similar pattern of improvement irrespective of type of head injury or drug/placebo treatment. This study suggests that CP-101,606, infused for up to 72 hours has no psychotropic effects and is well-tolerated in patients who have sustained a mild or moderate TBI or hemorrhagic stroke.

An open-label study of CP-101,606 in subjects with a severe traumatic head injury or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

CP-101,606 is a postsynaptic antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors bearing the NR2B subunit. When administered intravenously (i.v.), it decreases the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and focal ischemia in animal models. Therapeutic plasma concentrations (200 ng/ml) in animals, have been well tolerated in healthy human volunteers. The purpose of the present dose escalation study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of CP-101,606 in subjects who had suffered either an acute severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-8) or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Thirty patients, 20 with a TBI and 10 with a stroke, were enrolled in the trial and began receiving an i.v. infusion of CP-101,606 for 2 hours, 24 hours, or 72 hours within 12 hours of brain injury. For the first two hours, the drug was given a rate of 0.75 mg/kg/hr and then stopped (n = 17) or continued for 22 (n = 2) or 70 hours (n = 11) at 0.37 mg/kg/hr. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected at serial times during and after treatment. There were no consistent changes in blood pressure or pulse nor any clinically significant hematological or electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities attributable to CP-101,606. No adverse events or behavioral changes were considered to be related to the drug. Plasma concentrations of CP-101,606 over 200 ng/ml were rapidly achieved in the blood and CSF within two hours and were sustained there as long as the drug was infused. CSF concentrations were slightly higher than that in plasma by the end of infusion suggesting good penetration of CP-101,606 into the CSF. Outcome in the severe TBI patients, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Score at six months, suggested that a two-hour infusion yielded a range of scores similar to contemporary patients with a severe TBI treated at our hospital while the outcomes of the patients treated with either a 24- or 72-hour infusion were better on average. Thus, these results indicate that CP-101,606 infused for up to 72 hours is well tolerated, penetrates the CSF and brain, and may improve outcome in the brain-injured patient.

An exploratory haloperidol-controlled dose-finding study of ziprasidone in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Ninety patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-III-R criteria participated in this double-blind, exploratory, dose-ranging trial. After a single-blind washout period of 4 to 7 days, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four fixed doses of the new antipsychotic, ziprasidone 4 (N = 19), 10 (N = 17), 40 (N = 17), or 160 (N = 20) mg/day or haloperidol 15 mg/day (N = 17) for 4 weeks. A dose-response relationship among ziprasidone groups was established for improvements in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) score (p = 0.002) but not in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score (p = 0.08). The intent-to-treat analysis of mean changes from baseline in the BPRS total, BPRS Psychosis core, and CGI-S scores demonstrated that ziprasidone 160 mg/day was comparable with haloperidol in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms and was superior to ziprasidone 4 mg/day. Despite the small sample size and short duration of the trial, the improvement in CGI-S with both ziprasidone 160 mg/day and haloperidol 15 mg/day was statistically significantly greater than with ziprasidone 4 mg/day (p = 0.001 andp = 0.005, respectively). The percentage of patients classified as responders on both the BPRS total (> or = 30% improvement) and CGI-Improvement (score of 1 or 2) scales in the ziprasidone 160 mg/day group was similar to that in the haloperidol group and nonsignificantly greater than that in the ziprasidone 4 mg/day group. On all assessments of clinical efficacy, the improvements associated with ziprasidone 4 mg/day, 10 mg/day, and 40 mg/day were similar. Concomitant benztropine use at any time during the study was less frequent with ziprasidone 160 mg/day (15%) than with haloperidol (53%). Haloperidol was associated with a sustained hyperprolactinemia, unlike ziprasidone, where only transient elevations in prolactin that returned to normal within the dosing interval were observed. Ziprasidone was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups. The results of this study suggest that ziprasidone 160 mg/day is as effective as haloperidol 15 mg/day in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder but has a lower potential to induce extrapyramidal symptoms.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the leukotriene B4 receptor antagonist CP-105,696 in man following single oral administration.

AIMS: CP-105,696, (+)-1-(3S,4R)-[3-(4-phenylbenzyl)-4-hydroxy-chroman-7-yl] cyclopropane carboxylic acid is a potent, novel LTB4 receptor antagonist advanced to clinical trials to determine its efficacy in inflammatory diseases. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CP-105,696 were investigated in healthy male volunteers following oral administration of single doses of 5 to 640 mg. METHODS: Forty-eight subjects participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Plasma and urine concentrations of CP-105,696 were determined at intervals after drug administration. As an indication of LTB4 receptor antagonism following oral administration of CP-105,696, the inhibiton of LTB4-induced upregulation of the neutrophil cell surface complement receptor (CR3), CD11b/CD18, was monitored at 4 h following drug administration using an ex vivo whole blood flow cytometry assay. RESULTS: Cmax and AUC(0, infinity) increased in a dose-related manner. Respective mean Cmax values were 0.54 to 30.41 microg ml(-1) following doses of 5 to 640 mg. Respective mean AUC(0, infinity) values were 1337 to 16819 microg ml(-1) h for the 40 to 640 mg dose groups. Plasma concentrations declined in a monoexponential manner, with terminal elimination half-lives ranging from 289 to 495 h. Group mean terminal elimination half-lives were dose-independent. Urinary excretion of unchanged drug accounted for < 1% of the administered dose. A linear relationship was observed between CP-105,696 plasma concentrations and inhibition of LTB4-mediated CD11b upregulation on human neutrophils in whole blood. CP-105,696 plasma concentrations of 5-6 microg ml(-1) were necessary to elicit a two-fold shift to the right of the LTB4 concentration response curve for CD11b upregulation. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate pharmacologically significant LTB4-receptor antagonism following a single dose of CP-105,696 and pharmacokinetics consistent with once-daily dosing.

The effect of timing of a standard meal on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel atypical antipsychotic agent ziprasidone.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel atypical antipsychotic drug ziprasidone. DESIGN: Open, randomized, three-way crossover study. SETTING: University-based research facility. SUBJECTS: Eight healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Ziprasidone 20 mg was administered under fasting conditions (treatment A), and directly after (treatment B) and 2 hours after (treatment C) a standard high-fat breakfast. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were obtained over 36 hours. Three objective psychometric tests were employed to evaluate daytime vigilance at baseline and 2 hours after each dose. Ziprasidone had a significant effect on area under the curve (AUC0-infinity), maximum serum concentration, and half-life (analysis of variance all p<0.05), with the mean AUC0-infinity being significantly greater (627.2 +/- 206.4 vs 371.0 +/- 126.5 ng x hr/ml, ANOVA with Bonferroni's criteria p<0.016) and half-life significantly shorter (4.7 +/- 0.8 vs 6.6 +/- 1.3 hrs, ANOVA with Bonferroni's criteria p<0.016) after treatment B compared with treatment A. Although similar trends were observed after treatment C compared with treatment A, the differences did not reach statistical significance when Bonferroni's correction criteria were applied (p>0.016). CONCLUSION: These data suggest an increase in systemic exposure to the highly lipophilic compound ziprasidone when taken after fatty foods, possibly due to improved drug dissolution and solubilization. The drug's longer half-life under fasting conditions may reflect dissolution-limited absorption, although this could not be directly assessed. Despite postprandial increases in ziprasidone AUC0-infinity and maximum concentration, daytime vigilance was not affected.

Pharmacokinetics of sertraline and its N-demethyl metabolite in elderly and young male and female volunteers.

A nonblinded study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline in 22 young (aged 18 to 45 years) and 22 elderly (> 65 years) volunteers, of whom half were male and half were female. In this study, sertraline was administered at a dosage of 200mg once daily (the maximum recommended daily dosage) for 21 days after upward dosage titration from 50 mg/day over a 9-day period. Thus, this study was designed to measure the effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetic properties of sertraline at the maximum dosage recommended for clinical use. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta ) of sertraline was similar in young females, elderly males and elderly females (mean t1/2 beta ranged from 32.1 to 36.7 hours in these groups) but shorter (22.4 hours) in the young males. The mean maximum plasma sertraline concentration (Cmax) and the mean steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours postdose (AUC24) were also similar between the young females, elderly males and elderly females, but were approximately 25% lower in the young males. The time to Cmax was unaffected by age or gender and ranged from 6.4 to 6.9 hours. N-Demethylsertraline is the principal metabolite of sertraline and does not contribute significantly to its serotonergic actions. The mean values for N-demethylsertraline trough plasma concentrations, AUC24 and Cmax were comparable in elderly males and females and young females but lower in young males. The ratios of mean AUC24 and Cmax for N-demethylsertraline to the AUC24 and Cmax for sertraline were similar between the 4 groups.

A study of the potential effect of sertraline on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tolbutamide.

The effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline 200 mg/day on the metabolism of intravenously administered tolbutamide was examined in a randomised nonblinded parallel-group study in 25 healthy male volunteers. There was a small but statistically significant decrease (16%) in the clearance of tolbutamide in patients receiving the maximum recommended dosage of sertraline. The terminal elimination rate constant was also significantly reduced, corresponding to the increase in the terminal elimination half-life (from 6.9 to 8.6 hours). The decrease in clearance was not associated with any significant changes in plasma protein binding or in the apparent volume of distribution of tolbutamide. This suggests that the change in tolbutamide clearance may be due to a slight inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme CYP2C9/10 when sertraline was administered in its maximum recommended dosage. However, the small changes in the volume of distribution and plasma binding of tolbutamide after sertraline treatment indicate that there is a minimal interaction between sertraline and tolbutamide.