ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on clinical management, potential for peer learning, and referring physician satisfaction with subspecialist reinterpretations of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) imaging examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPB CTs and MRIs from outside hospitals were reinterpreted by two subspecialty radiologists between March 2021 and August 2022. Reinterpretation reports were mailed to radiologists that issued primary reports. The electronic record was reviewed to assess for changes in clinical management based on the reinterpretations (yes/no/unavailable). To assess the potential for peer learning, a survey using a 5-point Likert scale was sent to radiologists who issued primary reports. A separate survey was sent to referring physicians to assess satisfaction with reinterpretations. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty imaging examinations (122 CT, 128 MRI) were reinterpreted at the request of 19 referring physicians. Ninety-six radiologists issued primary reports. RADPEER scores 1-3 were assigned to 131/250 (52%), 86/250 (34%), and 33/250 (13%) examinations, respectively. Of 213 reinterpretations with adequate records for assessment, 75/213 (35%) were associated with a change in management; of these, 71/75 (95%) were classified as RADPEER 2 or 3. Most radiologists agreed or strongly agreed with the following: prefer to receive reinterpretations (34/36, 94%); reinterpretations changed practice of reporting HPB imaging examinations (23/36, 64%); and reinterpretations offer opportunities for peer learning (34/36, 94%). Referring physicians agreed or strongly agreed (7/7, 100%) that reinterpretations are valuable and often change or clarify management of patients with complex HPB disease, and offer an opportunity for peer learning. CONCLUSION: Radiologists and referring physicians strongly agree that HPB imaging reinterpretations help support peer learning and patient management, respectively.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To describe a case of postoperative persistent loculated subretinal fluid (SRF) that developed after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome. Methods: A case was analyzed and a literature review performed. Results: A healthy 64-year-old man with no significant ocular history presented with persistent, symptomatic VMT. Combined phacoemulsification and PPV, epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas-fluid exchange were performed. Postoperative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging showed loculated foveal SRF. The SRF persisted for 8 months, with minimal change in size and little best-corrected visual acuity improvement. Conclusions: Although persistent loculated SRF has been reported after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) in high myopia and tractional RD in diabetes, it has not yet been reported postoperatively after PPV for VMT. Studies of the pathophysiology and long-term course of persistent SRF after PPV for VMT are needed to inform management decisions for this rare complication.
ABSTRACT
: Tumor-to-meningioma metastasis (TTMM) is an uncommon phenomenon, in which a primary malignant tumor metastasizes to a recipient preexisting meningioma. Herein, the authors report a case of a 74-year-old man with a known history of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma who with frontal headache and right orbital apex syndrome. Initial CT studies demonstrated a right orbital roof osseous lesion. Subsequent MRI was reported as characteristic of an intraosseous meningioma with intracranial and intraorbital extensions. A biopsy of the right orbital mass was obtained and returned a diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer. The combination of imaging and pathologic findings suggested that the clinical scenario was overall most in keeping with a skull bone-based prostate adenocarcinoma metastasis infiltrating a preexisting meningioma. This is a rare case of TTMM in an orbit-based meningioma, presenting with an orbital apex syndrome.
