ABSTRACT
AIMS: To evaluate the pattern of prescribing of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in general practice, related to the primary clinical diagnosis and concomitant medication. DESIGN: A descriptive survey of general practitioners' prescribing habits, presumptive diagnosis and patient demography over a period of 2 weeks in April 1994. SETTING: A stratified quota sample of 22 practices in Northern Ireland. RESULTS: The major clinical indication for the use of ACE inhibitors was essential hypertension (61.5%) with only a minority usage (19.9%) in congestive heart failure. Co-prescription of drugs with potential for interaction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was not uncommon (16.7%). Of the 353 patients with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, only 64 (18.1%) were receiving ACE inhibitors. The dosages used were lower than recommended for this indication. A significantly higher proportion of elderly patients with heart failure were prescribed hypnotic drugs (14.7% versus 8.3%; p<0.001) and had the co-existence of insomnia (11.8% versus 6.9%; p<0.001) compared to patients without heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: ACE inhibitors were underused in the treatment of congestive heart failure, and were often prescribed in suboptimal dosages. The frequent concurrent prescription of hypnotics and the co-existence of insomnia in heart failure may reflect this therapeutic strategy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a senna-fibre combination and lactulose in treating constipation in long stay elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, cross over study. SETTING: Four hospitals in Northern Ireland, one hospital in England, and two nursing homes in England. SUBJECTS: 77 elderly patients with a history of chronic constipation in long term hospital or nursing home care. INTERVENTION: A senna-fibre combination (10 ml daily) or lactulose (15 ml twice daily) with matching placebo for two 14 day periods, with 3-5 days before and between treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stool frequency, stool consistency, and ease of evacuation; deviation from recommended dose; daily dose and cost per stool; adverse effects. RESULTS: Mean daily bowel frequency was greater with the senna-fibre combination (0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 0.9) than lactulose (0.6, 0.5 to 0.7; t = 3.51 p < or = 0.001). Scores for stool consistency and ease of evacuation were significantly higher for the senna-fibre combination than for lactulose. The recommended dose was exceeded more frequently with lactulose than the senna-fibre combination (chi 2 = 8.38, p or = 0.01). As an index of the standard daily dose, the dose per stool was 1.52 for lactulose and 0.97 for the senna-fibre combination, at a cost per stool of 39.7p for lactulose and 10.3p for senna-fibre. Adverse effects were no different for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were effective and well tolerated for chronic constipation in long stay elderly patients. The senna-fibre combination was significantly more effective than lactulose at a lower cost.
