Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Child Neuropsychol ; 25(7): 914-942, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30376759

ABSTRACT

Although behavioral studies have demonstrated that executive function (EF) develops rapidly during early childhood, few studies have investigated neural systems supporting EF during the preschool years. These systems are sensitive to variations in children's early life experiences, including preterm birth. The current study collected behavioral and event related potential (ERP) data during an EF task (directional Stroop) in a sample of 150 full-term and low-risk preterm children aged 4-years. Children's IQ and processing speed (WPPSI-III), and parent report of EF (BRIEF-P), were also measured. Forty-nine children born full-term and 43 low-risk preterm children provided useable ERP data. Similar to prior studies with adults and older children, preschool-aged children showed modulation of ERP components (N2, P3) by cognitive conflict. Effects of trial type were also present for early attentional components (N1 and P2). Exploratory analyses demonstrated that ERP measures of EF were correlated with individual differences in cognitive and behavioral functioning in both full-term and low-risk preterm populations. Future research investigating the neural correlates of early measures of EF in low-risk preterm children and other at-risk groups is warranted to better understand how trajectories of EF development are altered in the first years of life.


Subject(s)
Child Behavior/psychology , Executive Function/physiology , Premature Birth/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Risk Factors
2.
J Affect Disord ; 236: 69-74, 2018 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Emotional rigidity is described in clinical literature as a significant barrier to recovery; however, few there are few empirical measures of the construct. The current study had two aims: Study 1 aimed to identify latent factors that may bear on the construct of emotional rigidity while Study 2 assessed the potential impact of the latent factor(s) on anxiety remission rates and well-being. METHOD: This study utilized data from 2472 adult inpatients (1176 females and 1296 males) with severe psychopathology. Study 1 utilized exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to identify latent factors of emotional rigidity. Study 2 utilized hierarchical logistic regression analyses to assess the relationships among emotional rigidity factors and anxiety remission and well-being recovery at discharge. RESULTS: Study 1 yielded a two-factor solution identified in EFA was confirmed with CFA. Factor 1 consisted of neuroticism, experiential avoidance, non-acceptance of emotions, impaired goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties and limited access to emotion regulation strategies when experiencing negative emotions. Factor 2 consisted of lack of emotional awareness and lack of emotional clarity when experiencing negative emotions. Results of Study 2 indicated higher scores on Factor 1 was associated with lower remission rates from anxiety and poorer well-being upon discharge. Factor 2 was not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Emotional rigidity appears to be a latent construct that negatively impacts remission rates from anxiety. Limitations of the present study include its retrospective design, and inefficient methods of assessing emotional rigidity.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Emotions , Inpatients/psychology , Personality , Adult , Anxiety/therapy , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Psychopathology , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Psychiatr Pract ; 23(5): 312-319, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961660

ABSTRACT

The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has become increasingly common. They have been used to assess quality of care and to support policy decisions, but the evidence concerning their utility to improve patient outcomes is inconsistent. A better understanding of clinicians' experience with PROs has the potential to improve their effectiveness. This exploratory, quantitative, and qualitative study investigated the perspectives of clinicians (N=70) from multiple disciplines (psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and psychiatric nurses) on the utility of PROs in an inpatient psychiatric setting. During scheduled, monthly, discipline-specific administrative meetings, clinicians in attendance completed a 1-time, 5-item survey. The highest rated item related to the frequency of reviewing outcomes reports; this item was rated higher than all other items (mean±SD, 4.5±1.5), which 37.5% of the participants in the overall sample stated they "always" did. The lowest rated item related to the frequency of conveying the results of the outcomes reports to patients (3.3±1.9), which 20% of participants reported "always" doing; this item was rated lower than all other items (P<0.03). Qualitative analyses were based on 30 comments from 22 clinicians, which resulted in the emergence of 6 themes. The 2 themes that received the highest number of comments related to: (1) the sensitivity and specificity of measures across the PROs platform and (2) the value of the reports in directly influencing treatment decisions. Clinicians' relatively favorable perspective of PROs in practice in this study may be related to the assessment-oriented culture at the study institution. Nonetheless, many barriers to the routine use of PROs exist. Addressing clinician concerns has the potential to improve utilization of this facet of good clinical care.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/psychology , Inpatients , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Humans , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Quality Improvement
4.
J Affect Disord ; 209: 273-278, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27988411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current case-control study compared rates of clinically significant and reliable change in psychopathology and global functioning, prevalence of clinical deterioration, and rates of symptom remission among adult patients with obsessive compulsive personality disorder OCPD (n=52) and well-matched inpatients with any other personality disorder (n=56) and no personality disorder (n=53). METHODS: Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to select patients matched on specific criteria present in the OCPD group. Multivariate analysis of variance models measured differences in admission functioning and RCI change across depression and anxiety severity, emotion dysregulation and suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with OCPD admit to treatment with higher rates of depression, anxiety, difficulty with emotion regulation and non-acceptance of emotional experience than inpatient controls. Furthermore, OCPD patients respond to treatment at a similar rate to inpatient controls, but experience lower rates of anxiety remission upon discharge. Post-hoc analyses indicate individuals meeting stubbornness and rigidity (OCPD Criteria 8) were nine times more likely to report moderate to severe anxiety at point of discharge. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a predominantly Caucasian, inpatient sample, use of self-report measures and a non-manualized treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, OCPD inpatients benefit from an intensive multimodal psychiatric treatment, but experience more anxiety than non-PD patients upon discharge.


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Personality Disorders/therapy , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Personality Disorders/psychology , Self Report , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
J Anxiety Disord ; 35: 82-7, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26398370

ABSTRACT

Current research suggests that interpersonal trauma has an impact on insecure attachment and anxiety. Some research further suggests that attachment may play a mediating role between traumatic events and psychopathology. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the experience of interpersonal trauma, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance and clinical anxiety severity among adult psychiatric inpatients who reported having experienced interpersonal trauma after the age of 16. It was hypothesized that attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance would mediate the relationship between interpersonal trauma and clinical anxiety level. This study used archival data on 414 adult psychiatric inpatients in a large city in the Southwest U.S. Results suggest that interpersonal trauma was correlated to attachment avoidance but not to attachment anxiety and that attachment avoidance partially mediated the relation of interpersonal trauma to anxiety. The attachment framework appositely explains how a negative model of other contributes to the relation between experiences of interpersonal trauma and anxiety in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Object Attachment , Stress Disorders, Traumatic/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Avoidance Learning/physiology , Female , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Life Change Events , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
6.
J Affect Disord ; 174: 411-5, 2015 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25553401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is characterized by traits such as extreme rigidity, perfectionism, and controlling behavior, all of which have a negative impact on interpersonal functioning. Attachment theory provides a useful framework to elucidate the interpersonal dysfunction characteristic of OCPD; yet, there is a dearth of attachment research on OCPD in the context of severe mental illness. METHODS: Attachment security and personality disorders were assessed in adult inpatients with severe mental illness. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to match OCPD and control subjects on age, gender, number of psychiatric disorders, and number of criteria endorsed for borderline personality disorder. RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, the OCPD group (n=61) showed greater attachment avoidance than controls (n=61), and the avoidance was manifested in a predominance of the most insecure attachment style, fearful attachment. Correlations between attachment anxiety/avoidance with specific OCPD diagnostic criteria revealed that attachment avoidance was correlated with four of eight OCPD criteria across the full sample. Within the subset of OCPD patients, attachment avoidance was significantly correlated with OCPD criterion 3 (is excessively devoted to work and productivity to the exclusion of leisure activities and friendships). LIMITATIONS: The use of self-report measure of attachment and the high burden of illness in the SMI population may not generalize to interview based assessment or outpatients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings attest to the severity of impairment in interpersonal functioning and attachment avoidance, in particular, is characteristic of OCPD patients. These results suggest that viable treatment targets include interpersonal functioning along with more classical features of OCPD such as perfectionism and obsessiveness in task performance.


Subject(s)
Compulsive Personality Disorder/psychology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Object Attachment , Adult , Compulsive Personality Disorder/complications , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...