Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
EBioMedicine ; 102: 105005, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SE) are used to replace energy yielding sugars and maintain sweet taste in a wide range of products, but controversy exists about their effects on appetite and endocrine responses in reduced or no added sugar solid foods. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the acute (1 day) and repeated (two-week daily) ingestive effects of 2 S&SE vs. sucrose formulations of biscuit with fruit filling on appetite and endocrine responses in adults with overweight and obesity. METHODS: In a randomised crossover trial, 53 healthy adults (33 female, 20 male) with overweight/obesity in England and France consumed biscuits with fruit filling containing 1) sucrose, or reformulated with either 2) Stevia Rebaudioside M (StRebM) or 3) Neotame daily during three, two-week intervention periods with a two-week washout. The primary outcome was composite appetite score defined as [desire to eat + hunger + (100 - fullness) + prospective consumption]/4. FINDINGS: Each formulation elicited a similar reduction in appetite sensations (3-h postprandial net iAUC). Postprandial insulin (2-h iAUC) was lower after Neotame (95% CI (0.093, 0.166); p < 0.001; d = -0.71) and StRebM (95% CI (0.133, 0.205); p < 0.001; d = -1.01) compared to sucrose, and glucose was lower after StRebM (95% CI (0.023, 0.171); p < 0.05; d = -0.39) but not after Neotame (95% CI (-0.007, 0.145); p = 0.074; d = -0.25) compared to sucrose. There were no differences between S&SE or sucrose formulations on ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 or pancreatic polypeptide iAUCs. No clinically meaningful differences between acute vs. two-weeks of daily consumption were found. INTERPRETATION: In conclusion, biscuits reformulated to replace sugar using StRebM or Neotame showed no differences in appetite or endocrine responses, acutely or after a two-week exposure, but can reduce postprandial insulin and glucose response in adults with overweight or obesity. FUNDING: The present study was funded by the Horizon 2020 program: Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers: Impact on health, obesity, safety and sustainability (acronym: SWEET, grant no: 774293).


Subject(s)
Appetite , Dipeptides , Diterpenes, Kaurane , Stevia , Trisaccharides , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Sucrose/pharmacology , Overweight/drug therapy , Taste , Cross-Over Studies , Prospective Studies , Blood Glucose , Obesity/drug therapy , Sweetening Agents/pharmacology , Glucose , Insulin/pharmacology , Sugars/pharmacology
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e063903, 2022 12 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564114

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intake of free sugars in European countries is high and attempts to reduce sugar intake have been mostly ineffective. Non-nutritive sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SEs) can maintain sweet taste in the absence of energy, but little is known about the impact of acute and repeated consumption of S&SE in foods on appetite. This study aims to evaluate the effect of acute and repeated consumption of two individual S&SEs and two S&SE blends in semisolid and solid foods on appetite and related behavioural, metabolic and health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A work package of the SWEET Project; this study consists of five double-blind randomised cross-over trials which will be carried out at five sites across four European countries, aiming to have n=213. Five food matrices will be tested across three formulations (sucrose-sweetened control vs two reformulated products with S&SE blends and no added sugar). Participants (body mass index 25-35 kg/m2; aged 18-60 years) will consume each formulation for 14 days. The primary endpoint is composite appetite score (hunger, inverse of fullness, desire to eat and prospective food consumption) over a 3-hour postprandial incremental area under the curve during clinical investigation days on days 1 and 14. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by national ethical committees and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals. Research data from the trial will be deposited in an open-access online research data archive. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04633681.


Subject(s)
Appetite , Sweetening Agents , Humans , Overweight , Taste , Energy Intake , Obesity/metabolism , Sugars , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(7): e045663, 2021 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34285005

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The newer glucose-lowering therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2D), the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have additional clinical benefits beyond improving glycaemic control; promoting weight loss, addressing associated cardiovascular risk factors and reducing macrovascular and microvascular complications. Considering their independent mechanisms of actions, there is a potential for significant synergy with combination therapy, yet limited data exist. This 32-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will gain mechanistic insight into the effects of coadministration of exenatide QW, a weekly subcutaneous GLP1-RA, with dapagliflozin, a once daily oral SGLT2i, on the dynamic, adaptive changes in energy balance, total, regional and organ-specific fat mass and multiorgan insulin sensitivity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 110 obese patients with diagnosed T2D (glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol) will be treated for 32 weeks with dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily either alone or in combination with exenatide QW (2 mg once weekly); active treatments will be compared with a control group (placebo tablet and sham injection). The primary objective of the study is to compare the adjusted mean reduction in total body fat mass (determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, DEXA) from baseline following 32 weeks of treatment with exenatide QW and dapagliflozin versus dapagliflozin alone compared with control (placebo). Secondary outcome measures include changes in (1) energy balance (energy intake and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry); (2) appetite (between and within meals) and satiety quotient; (3) body composition including visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue, liver and pancreatic fat. Exploratory outcome measures include metabolic changes in hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity (using a two-stage hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp), central nervous system responses to food images using blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) and changes in cardiovascular function (using transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac MR and duplex ultrasonography). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the North West Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (14/NW/1147) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice. Results from the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific and open access journals and/or presented at scientific conferences and summarised for distribution to the participants. TRIAL SPONSOR: University of Liverpool. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 52028580; EUDRACT number 2015-005242-60.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Benzhydryl Compounds , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Exenatide , Glucosides , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Obesity/complications , Obesity/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
4.
BMJ Open ; 11(3): e048317, 2021 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33737446

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The emergence and rapid spread of COVID-19 have caused widespread and catastrophic public health and economic impact, requiring governments to restrict societal activity to reduce the spread of the disease. The role of household transmission in the population spread of SARS-CoV-2, and of host immunity in limiting transmission, is poorly understood. This paper describes a protocol for a prospective observational study of a cohort of households in Liverpool City Region, UK, which addresses the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between household members and how immunological response to the infection changes over time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Households in the Liverpool City Region, in which members have not previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with a nucleic acid amplification test, are followed up for an initial period of 12 weeks. Participants are asked to provide weekly self-throat and nasal swabs and record their activity and presence of symptoms. Incidence of infection and household secondary attack rates of COVID-19 are measured. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 will be investigated against a range of demographic and behavioural variables. Blood and faecal samples are collected at several time points to evaluate immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and prevalence and risk factors for faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee; REC Reference: 20/HRA/2297, IRAS Number: 283 464. Results will be disseminated through scientific conferences and peer-reviewed open access publications. A report of the findings will also be shared with participants. The study will quantify the scale and determinants of household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, immunological responses before and during the different stages of infection will be analysed, adding to the understanding of the range of immunological response by infection severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Research Design , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Psychophysiology ; 56(3): e13299, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30444000

ABSTRACT

Expectations can affect subjective sensory and hedonic ratings of tastes, but it is unclear whether they also shape sensory experience at a perceptual level. The neural correlates of the taste-expectancy relationship were explored through EEG analysis. Using a trial-by-trial cueing paradigm, lingual delivery of 0.05 M or 0.3 M sucrose solutions was preceded by congruent or incongruent visual cues designed to promote anticipation of either a low-sweet or high-sweet solution. When participants were cued to expect low-sweet, but received high-sweet (incongruent cue), intensity ratings for high-sweet decreased. Likewise, expectation of high-sweet increased intensity ratings of low-sweet solutions. Taste-dependent, right central-parietal gustatory ERPs were detected, with greater P1 (associated with greater right insula activation) and P2 peak amplitudes for high-sweet tastes. Valid cue-taste pairings led to specific reduced right-lateralized N400 responses (associated with an attenuation in right insula activation) compared with invalid cue-taste pairings. Finally, P1 amplitudes following invalidly cued low-sweet tastes closely matched those generated by expected high-sweet tastes, and P1 amplitudes for invalidly cued high-sweet tastes resembled those generated by low-sweet tastes. We conclude that, as well as modifying subjective ratings toward the anticipated intensity level, expectations affect cortical activity in a top-down manner to induce bidirectional assimilation in the early perceptual processing of sweet taste and modulate N400 ERP components not previously associated with gustatory stimulation.


Subject(s)
Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Cues , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Taste Perception/physiology , Adult , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Sucrose/administration & dosage , Sweetening Agents/administration & dosage , Visual Perception , Young Adult
6.
Neuropsychologia ; 50(14): 3250-61, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23063934

ABSTRACT

The perception and appreciation of visual symmetry have been studied in several recent EEG experiments. Although symmetry is known to be an important determinant of aesthetic preference, previous studies have concluded that evaluation does not occur spontaneously. These studies also found that symmetrical and random patterns do not differ in terms of early sensory processing, within 200 ms of stimulus onset. We presented participants with symmetrical or random abstract patterns, which they had to classify correctly. Contrary to previous work, we found that N1 amplitude was sensitive to all types of regularity, and P1 was sensitive to rotational symmetry. We also found that activity in the Zygomaticus Major, the facial muscle responsible for smiling, was greater for reflection patterns. However, we were able to reverse this effect by changing the task so that participants had to treat random patterns as the target stimuli. We conclude that participants spontaneously select reflectional symmetry as the target, and positive affective responses automatically follow from successful target detection. This work provides a new account of the neural mechanisms involved in visual symmetry perception.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Emotions/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Electroencephalography , Electromyography , Facial Muscles/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Reaction Time/physiology , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...