ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To perform focused or minimally invasive surgery for hyperparathyroidism (HPT) exact preoperative localization is mandatory. Computed tomography-(99m)Tc-sestamibi-single photon emission computed tomography image fusion (CT-MIBI-SPECT) serves this difficult task in single gland HPT to a large extent. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to MIBI-SPECT alone and CT alone in detecting abnormal parathyroid tissue in patients with multiglandular disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion for preoperative localization was performed in 30 patients with multiglandular disease. There were six patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (four MEN I syndromes and two double adenomas; one of these patients has HRPT2 gene mutation), 14 with secondary, and eight with tertiary HPT, further one patient each suffering from persistent primary and persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism. In both persistent patients only one remaining gland was left from primary surgery. The results of MIBI-SPECT, CT, and CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion were compared in these patients. The outcome and the exact predicted positions were correlated with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: In five out of six patients with multiglandular primary hyperparathyroidism more than one gland was detected, thus multiglandular disease could be suspected preoperatively. Overall CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was able to predict the exact position of all abnormal glands per patient in 14 of 30 (46.7%) cases, whereas CT alone was successful in 11 (36.7%), and MIBI-SPECT alone just in four (13.3%) of 30 patients. CONCLUSION: Multiglandular disease in primary hyperparathyroidism can be suspected preoperatively in a high percentage of patients. Additionally, this study shows that CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to CT or MIBI-SPECT alone in preoperative localization of all pathologic glands in patients suffering from multiglandular disease.
Subject(s)
Hyperparathyroidism/diagnostic imaging , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism/surgery , Intraoperative Care/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiopharmaceuticals , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND DATA: Computed tomography (CT) together with 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (MIBI-SPECT) image fusion (CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion) allows virtual exploration of the neck. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to MIBI-SPECT and CT in detecting abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion for preoperative localization was performed in 116 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Both investigations were performed with reproducible fixation of the patient on a vacuum mattress. At a special work station the neck was virtually explored by viewing the CT images in all 3 dimensions. The MIBI-SPECT images were superimposed on underlying CT images. Only patients with single-gland disease were evaluated (pHPT: 112, persistent pHPT: 1, recurrent pHPT: 1, persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism: 1, tertiary HPT after kidney transplantation: 1). CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion results were compared with those obtained with CT alone and MIBI-SPECT alone. The predicted positions were correlated with the intraoperative findings. RESULTS: CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was able to predict the exact position of the abnormal gland in 102 (88%) of the 116 patients, whereas CT alone showed in 75 (65%) patients and MIBI-SPECT alone in 64 (55%) patients the exact position of the abnormal gland. Sixty-two patients underwent minimally invasive surgery, namely in 21 patients with a unilaterally focused approach and in 33 patients with a bilateral approach (27 of these underwent simultaneous thyroid resection). Sensitivity for CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was 88%, for CT alone 70%, and for MIBI-SPECT alone 59%. Specificity for CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was 99%, for MIBI-SPECT alone 95%, for CT alone 94%. Overall accuracy for CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was 97%, for CT alone 89%, for MIBI-SPECT 87%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to CT or MIBI-SPECT alone for preoperative localization of enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with single-gland primary hyperparathyroidism.
Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Parathyroid Glands/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Parathyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism, preoperative localization together with intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay is important when minimal invasive operations of the parathyroid glands are intended. In cases of reoperation, correct localization of the abnormal parathyroid glands is extremely instrumental. Computed tomography (CT)-(99m)Tc-sestamibi (MIBI)-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image fusion allows for a virtual exploration of the neck by showing the suspected gland three-dimensionally with all the anatomic landmarks in correct position. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to MIBI-SPECT alone in detecting abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with previous neck surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion for preoperative localization was performed in 28 patients with hyperparathyroidism and previous neck surgery. Twenty-one patients had thyroidectomy and seven patients had surgery for hyperparathyroidism. The results of MIBI-SPECT alone and CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion were compared in these patients. The outcome and the exact predicted position, not just the predicted side, were correlated with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion was able to predict the exact position of the abnormal gland in 24 of 28 patients (86%), whereas MIBI-SPECT alone was successful in 12 of 28 cases (43%, p < 0.004) only. CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion detected all three pathologic glands in their ectopic position. With MIBI-SPECT alone, just one ectopic pathologic gland was found. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion is superior to MIBI-SPECT alone in preoperative localization of enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with hyperparathyroidism and previous neck surgery. This should be kept in mind if the results are compared to earlier studies concerning CT-MIBI-SPECT image fusion.
