Benchmarking machine learning-based real-time respiratory signal predictors in 4D SBRT.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors has to account for respiratory intrafractional tumor motion. Commonly, an external breathing signal is continuously acquired that serves as a surrogate of the tumor motion and forms the basis of strategies like breathing-guided imaging and gated dose delivery. However, due to inherent system latencies, there exists a temporal lag between the acquired respiratory signal and the system response. Respiratory signal prediction models aim to compensate for the time delays and to improve imaging and dose delivery. PURPOSE: The present study explores and compares six state-of-the-art machine and deep learning-based prediction models, focusing on real-time and real-world applicability. All models and data are provided as open source and data to ensure reproducibility of the results and foster reuse. METHODS: The study was based on 2502 breathing signals ( t t o t a l ≈ 90 $t_{total} \approx 90$  h) acquired during clinical routine, split into independent training (50%), validation (20%), and test sets (30%). Input signal values were sampled from noisy signals, and the target signal values were selected from corresponding denoised signals. A standard linear prediction model (Linear), two state-of-the-art models in general univariate signal prediction (Dlinear, Xgboost), and three deep learning models (Lstm, Trans-Enc, Trans-TSF) were chosen. The prediction performance was evaluated for three different prediction horizons (480, 680, and 920 ms). Moreover, the robustness of the different models when applied to atypical, that is, out-of-distribution (OOD) signals, was analyzed. RESULTS: The Lstm model achieved the lowest normalized root mean square error for all prediction horizons. The prediction errors only slightly increased for longer horizons. However, a substantial spread of the error values across the test signals was observed. Compared to typical, that is, in-distribution test signals, the prediction accuracy of all models decreased when applied to OOD signals. The more complex deep learning models Lstm and Trans-Enc showed the least performance loss, while the performance of simpler models like Linear dropped the most. Except for Trans-Enc, inference times for the different models allowed for real-time application. CONCLUSION: The application of the Lstm model achieved the lowest prediction errors. Simpler prediction filters suffer from limited signal history access, resulting in a drop in performance for OOD signals.

Dose reduction in sequence scanning 4D CT imaging through respiratory signal-guided tube current modulation: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory signal-guided 4D CT sequence scanning such as the recently introduced Intelligent 4D CT (i4DCT) approach reduces image artifacts compared to conventional 4D CT, especially for irregular breathing. i4DCT selects beam-on periods during scanning such that data sufficiency conditions are fulfilled for each couch position. However, covering entire breathing cycles during beam-on periods leads to redundant projection data and unnecessary dose to the patient during long exhalation phases. PURPOSE: We propose and evaluate the feasibility of respiratory signal-guided dose modulation (i.e., temporary reduction of the CT tube current) to reduce the i4DCT imaging dose while maintaining high projection data coverage for image reconstruction. METHODS: The study is designed as an in-silico feasibility study. Dose down- and up-regulation criteria were defined based on the patients' breathing signals and their representative breathing cycle learned before and during scanning. The evaluation (including an analysis of the impact of the dose modulation criteria parameters) was based on 510 clinical 4D CT breathing curves. Dose reduction was determined as the fraction of the downregulated dose delivery time to the overall beam-on time. Furthermore, under the assumption of a 10-phase 4D CT and amplitude-based reconstruction, beam-on periods were considered negatively affected by dose modulation if the downregulation period covered an entire phase-specific amplitude range for a specific breathing phase (i.e., no appropriate reconstruction of the phase image possible for this specific beam-on period). Corresponding phase-specific amplitude bins are subsequently denoted as compromised bins. RESULTS: Dose modulation resulted in a median dose reduction of 10.4% (lower quartile: 7.4%, upper quartile: 13.8%, maximum: 28.6%; all values corresponding to a default parameterization of the dose modulation criteria). Compromised bins were observed in 1.0% of the beam-on periods (72 / 7370 periods) and affected 10.6% of the curves (54/510 curves). The extent of possible dose modulation depends strongly on the individual breathing patterns and is weakly correlated with the median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.22, p < 0.001). Moreover, the fraction of beam-on periods with compromised bins is weakly anti-correlated with the patient's median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.24; p < 0.001). Among the curves with the 17% longest average breathing cycles, no negatively affected beam-on periods were observed. CONCLUSION: Respiratory signal-guided dose modulation for i4DCT imaging is feasible and promises to significantly reduce the imaging dose with little impact on projection data coverage. However, the impact on image quality remains to be investigated in a follow-up study.

Clinical application of breathing-adapted 4D CT: image quality comparison to conventional 4D CT.

PURPOSE: 4D CT imaging is an integral part of 4D radiotherapy workflows. However, 4D CT data often contain motion artifacts that mitigate treatment planning. Recently, breathing-adapted 4D CT (i4DCT) was introduced into clinical practice, promising artifact reduction in in-silico and phantom studies. Here, we present an image quality comparison study, pooling clinical patient data from two centers: a new i4DCT and a conventional spiral 4D CT patient cohort. METHODS: The i4DCT cohort comprises 129 and the conventional spiral 4D CT cohort 417 4D CT data sets of lung and liver tumor patients. All data were acquired for treatment planning. The study consists of three parts: illustration of image quality in selected patients of the two cohorts with similar breathing patterns; an image quality expert rater study; and automated analysis of the artifact frequency. RESULTS: Image data of the patients with similar breathing patterns underline artifact reduction by i4DCT compared to conventional spiral 4D CT. Based on a subgroup of 50 patients with irregular breathing patterns, the rater study reveals a fraction of almost artifact-free scans of 89% for i4DCT and only 25% for conventional 4D CT; the quantitative analysis indicated a reduction of artifact frequency by 31% for i4DCT. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate 4D CT image quality improvement for patients with irregular breathing patterns by breathing-adapted 4D CT in this first corresponding clinical data image quality comparison study.