ABSTRACT
Medical simulation has become an integral aspect of modern healthcare education and practice. It has evolved to become an essential aspect of teaching core concepts and skills, common and rare presentations, algorithms and protocols, communication, interpersonal and teamworking skills and testing new equipment and systems. Simulation-based learning (SBL) is useful for the novice to the senior clinician. Healthcare is a complex adaptive system built from very large numbers of mutually interacting subunits (e.g., different professions, departments, equipment). These subunits generate multiple repeated interactions that have the potential to result in rich, collective behaviour that feeds back into the organisation. There is a unique opportunity in New Zealand with the formation of Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand and Te Aka Whai Ora - Maori Health Authority and the reorganisation of the healthcare system. This viewpoint is a white paper for the integration of SBL into our healthcare system. We describe our concerns in the current system and list our current capabilities. The way SBL could be implemented in pre- and post-registration phases of practice are explored as well as the integration of communication and culture. Interprofessional education has been shown to improve outcomes and is best done with an interprofessional simulation curriculum. We describe ways that simulation is currently used in our system and describe other uses such as quality improvement, safety and systems engineering and integration. The aim of this viewpoint is to alert Te Whatu Ora and Te Aka Whai Ora of the existing infrastructure of the simulation community in New Zealand and encourage them to invest in its future.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Simulation Training , Curriculum , New ZealandABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interprofessional education initiatives can be used as effective means to influence students' perceptions of their own and others' roles and interactions as health professionals. There is a need to better understand how interprofessional education learning outcomes are appreciated by students. AIM: The aims of this study were to describe and compare evaluation feedback from students in undergraduate nursing and medicine programmes about the learning outcomes of an interprofessional education initiative. METHODS: A mixed methods pre-post-study design was used to collect data using evaluation questions about the initiative and two interprofessional learning outcomes: communication and teamwork. Ratings were analysed with a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance or a t-test. Written responses were analysed using a general inductive approach. RESULTS: Data from 30 nursing students and 12 medical students were analysed. A noteworthy finding was a significantly higher average rating for nursing students than medicine students before and after the session for the statement about valuing interprofessional learning. Three themes represented comments from both groups: positive experiences, relevance to practice, and learning design issues. DISCUSSION: Findings were interpreted to indicate that students from both programmes valued the learning outcomes session and was greater at the end of the session. Notably, the perceived value of interprofessional learning was higher for nursing students than medical students before and after the session. This finding may be related to the familiarity nursing students may have with the teaching methods used in the initiative. Further exploration of this finding is needed so educators can better understand how they can provide optimal learning experiences for all students who participate in interprofessional education. CONCLUSION: Nursing and medicine students appear to value the interprofessional learning outcomes in an undergraduate health professional initiative. However, differences between these two groups of students are an area for further exploration.
