Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling condition, and many patients do not respond to available treatments. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) is a new technology allowing non-surgical stimulation of relatively deep brain areas. This is the first double-blind randomized controlled multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of dTMS in MDD. We recruited 212 MDD outpatients, aged 22-68 years, who had either failed one to four antidepressant trials or not tolerated at least two antidepressant treatments during the current episode. They were randomly assigned to monotherapy with active or sham dTMS. Twenty sessions of dTMS (18 Hz over the prefrontal cortex) were applied during 4 weeks acutely, and then biweekly for 12 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) score and response/remission rates at week 5, respectively. dTMS induced a 6.39 point improvement in HDRS-21 scores, while a 3.28 point improvement was observed in the sham group (p=0.008), resulting in a 0.76 effect size. Response and remission rates were higher in the dTMS than in the sham group (response: 38.4 vs. 21.4%, p=0.013; remission: 32.6 vs. 14.6%, p=0.005). These differences between active and sham treatment were stable during the 12-week maintenance phase. dTMS was associated with few and minor side effects apart from one seizure in a patient where a protocol violation occurred. These results suggest that dTMS constitutes a novel intervention in MDD, which is efficacious and safe in patients not responding to antidepressant medications, and whose effect remains stable over 3 months of maintenance treatment.

An open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease in the long term care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of epoetin alfa administered in extended-dosing intervals to a target hemoglobin (Hb) level not exceeding 12.0 g/dL for the treatment of anemia in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. DESIGN: An open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled study consisting of a 1-week screening phase and a 26-week open-label treatment phase. SETTING: Twenty-seven long term care (LTC) facilities in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with CKD who were not receiving dialysis, who had not received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent for 8 weeks before screening, and whose Hb levels were lower than 11.0 g/dL at screening were eligible. INTERVENTION: In the epoetin alfa group, subjects were administered 20,000 international units epoetin alfa subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W). Dosing was based on the Hb concentration measurement obtained by HemoCue Hb201+System (Quest Diagnostics; Madison, NJ) at the time of the scheduled dose. When the Hb concentration was 11.0 to 11.5 g/dL on 2 consecutive biweekly measurements, the dose was doubled and administered on the day that the second consecutive measurement was obtained. The dosing interval was then extended to every 4 weeks (Q4W). Subjects in the standard of care (SOC) group received treatment for their anemia according to the practice of the LTC facility. MEASUREMENTS: Study visits were every 2 weeks, at which time blood was drawn and used for efficacy analysis. Measurements included: the Hb concentration change from baseline to the end of the study; the proportion of subjects who achieved an Hb response (defined as 2 consecutive Hb measurements at least 1.0 g/dL greater than baseline or 2 consecutive Hb measurements ≥11.0 g/dL at any time during the study); the time to the Hb response; the proportion of subjects who received a transfusion and the number of units of transfused; the proportion of epoetin alfa-treated subjects converting to Q4W dosing; and the proportion of subjects who converted to Q4W dosing and remained on Q4W dosing through the end of the study. RESULTS: A total of 157 subjects were randomized: 118 subjects to the epoetin alfa group and 39 to the SOC group. The mean change in Hb was significantly greater in the epoetin alfa group (0.9 g/dL) compared with the SOC group (0.3 g/dL) (P = .006). A significantly greater percentage of subjects achieved a Hb response in the epoetin alfa group (85.1%) compared with the SOC group (53.8%) (P < .001). The time to achieve a Hb response was significantly shorter in the epoetin alfa group (41 days) than in the SOC group (114 days) (P < .0001). There were no transfusions in the SOC group, whereas 4 subjects (3.5%) required transfusions in the epoetin alfa group. Of the 114 subjects receiving epoetin alfa, 33 (28.9%) subjects were converted to Q4W dosing, and all subjects who converted were able to be maintained on this schedule. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of epoetin alfa in extended-dosing intervals of Q2W followed by Q4W was safe and effective in the treatment of anemia in subjects with CKD who reside in LTC facilities.

Methylnaltrexone treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness.

Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist with restricted ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, reverses opioid-induced constipation (OIC) without affecting analgesia. A double-blind study in patients with advanced illness and OIC demonstrated that methylnaltrexone significantly induced laxation within four hours after the first dose compared with placebo. In this study, patients with advanced illness and OIC on stable doses of opioids and laxatives were randomized to methylnaltrexone 0.15mg/kg (n=62) or placebo (n=71) subcutaneously every other day for two weeks. Laxation was assessed daily. Constipation distress, bowel status change, pain, laxative use, and opioid withdrawal symptoms were assessed weekly using standardized scales. Additional analyses to further characterize response to methylnaltrexone revealed that among patients with a bowel movement within four hours following the first dose, the median time to response was 0.5 hours for methylnaltrexone. Response rates among methylnaltrexone-treated patients who had responded to all previous doses were 57%-100% for doses two to seven. Among methylnaltrexone-treated patients who did not respond to the first or to the first two consecutive doses, 35% and 26% responded to the second and third dose, respectively. Higher percentages of patients and clinicians rated bowel status as improved in the methylnaltrexone than the placebo group. Fewer methylnaltrexone than placebo patients reported use of common laxative types, particularly enemas, during the study. Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone promptly and predictably induced laxation, improved constipation distress, and was associated with less laxative use in patients with advanced illness and OIC.