Auditory discrimination in aging bilinguals vs. monolinguals with and without hearing loss.

Demands for effective assessments of speech perception specific to the aging brain are increasing, as the impacts of hearing loss on an individual's functional health, socialization, and cognition have become more widely recognized. Understanding the mechanisms behind the optimal function of the aging brain in relation to speech and language is challenging, especially in the bilingual population where the language learning and language interference processes could be mistaken for perceptual difficulty. Age-related presbycusis is unavoidable, and the contributions of this sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) process on impaired speech recognition are not completely understood. This lack of understanding of the effects of aging and bilingual language competency on speech perception can act as a barrier to successful auditory rehabilitation. The present study investigated the effects of aging on vowel sound discrimination in adult listeners (age 50+) with the following characteristics: American English (AE) monolinguals with normal hearing, simultaneous or early sequential Spanish-English (SE) bilinguals with normal hearing, and AE monolinguals with SNHL (AE-SNHL). The goal was to identify the differences in vowel sound discrimination performance between the monolingual and bilingual aging populations to guide future language assessments and intervention processes. English vowel discrimination was assessed using an AXB discrimination task in quiet and using the Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) test. SE bilinguals were outperformed by AE and AE-SNHL monolinguals, suggesting SE bilinguals primarily use their L1 acoustic properties to discriminate speech segments. No significant difference was found in QuickSIN performance between the bilingual and the monolingual groups, but there was a significant difference between AE and AE-SNHL. In conclusion, vowel discrimination was affected by interference with the native language, while performance in the noise condition was affected by hearing loss. The results of this study contribute to our understanding of the age-related speech processing deficits from three different aging groups regarding the cognitive control system.

Simultaneous Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Children With Severe Inner Ear Malformations: Initial Surgical and Audiological Results.

OBJECTIVE: To report the initial surgical and audiological outcomes of three pediatric patients with severe inner ear malformations who were simultaneously implanted with cochlear and brainstem implants in the same surgical session. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three pediatric patients with severe inner ear malformations between ages of 1.9 to 2.5 years, who were simultaneously implanted with cochlear implant in one ear and auditory brainstem implant in the other ear. INTERVENTION(S): Simultaneous application of cochlar implant in one ear, auditory brainstem implant in the other ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Free field thresholds with cochlear and brainstem implants. Surgical issues are also discussed. RESULTS: The study is descriptive in nature. Free field thresholds with each device alone and together showed good progress. One of the patients had slower progress possibly due to comorbid CHARGE syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed good progress in terms of audition with both devices. Simultaneous cochlear and brainstem application serves as a remedy for pediatric patients who are candidates for cochlear implant on one side and brainstem implant on the other side. With this simultaneous application precious time for auditory development is not lost.

Early Communication Development of Children with Auditory Brainstem Implants.

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory sensory device that is surgically placed on the cochlear nucleus of the brainstem for individuals who are deaf but unable to benefit from a cochlear implant (CI) due to anatomical abnormalities of the cochlea and/or eighth nerve, specific disease processes, or temporal bone fractures. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration has authorized a Phase I clinical trial to determine safety and feasibility of the ABI in up to 10 eligible young children who are deaf and either derived no benefit from the CI or were anatomically unable to receive a CI. In this paper, we describe the study protocol and the children who have enrolled in the study thus far. In addition, we report the scores on speech perception, speech production, and language (spoken and signed) for five children with 1-3 years of assessment post-ABI activation. To date, the results indicate that spoken communication skills are slow to develop and that visual communication remains essential for post-ABI intervention.

Initial Results of a Safety and Feasibility Study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and feasibility of the auditory brainstem implant (ABI) in congenitally deaf children with cochlear aplasia and/or cochlear nerve deficiency. STUDY DESIGN: Phase I feasibility clinical trial of surgery in 10 children, ages 2 to 5 years, over a 3-year period. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital and university-based pediatric speech/language/hearing center. INTERVENTION(S): ABI implantation and postsurgical programming. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure is the number and type of adverse events during ABI surgery and postsurgical follow-up, including behavioral mapping of the device. The secondary outcome measure is access to and early integration of sound. RESULTS: To date, nine children are enrolled. Five children have successfully undergone ABI surgery and postoperative behavioral programming. Three children were screen failures, and one child is currently undergoing candidacy evaluation. Expected adverse events have been documented in three of the five children who received the ABI. One child experienced a cerebral spinal fluid leak, which resolved with lumbar drainage. One child demonstrated vestibular side effects during device programming, which resolved by deactivating one electrode. One child experienced postoperative vomiting resulting in an abdominal radiograph. Four children have completed their 1-year follow-up and have speech detection thresholds of 30 to 35 dB HL. Scores on the IT-MAIS/MAIS range from 8 to 31 (out of a total of 40), and the children are demonstrating some ability to discriminate between closed-sets words that differ by number of syllables (pattern perception). CONCLUSION: ABI surgery and device activation seem to be safe and feasible in this preliminary cohort.

Creating a framework for data sharing in cochlear implant research.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the development process of a national database that was designed to facilitate communication and collaboration, improve care, and create a framework for aggregate data sharing in cochlear implant (CI) research. METHODS: A group of nationally represented, multidisciplinary CI providers cooperated to define a standard set of data elements to incorporate into a database built by them in association with a group of computer scientists and software designers. CI centers across the USA, then, joined the non-profit Auditory Implant Initiative to use the database for their own clinical purposes and to help contribute to the national de-identified dataset for research and analytics. RESULTS: Approximately 12 months after the full release of the database, clinical information on 373 patients has been entered from 17 different CI centers representing 61 hearing professionals. A blend of six academic, seven private, and four non-profit CI centers participated in this phase of the data sharing network. DISCUSSION: The adoption of a single, standardized database by 17 centers throughout the USA has begun a framework for data sharing in CI research. Future steps include (1) expanding adoption, (2) scaling the database to include more patients, (3) streamlining the legal hurdles required for adoption, and (4) integrating the database with other software platforms (e.g. electronic health records, processors). CONCLUSION: A standardized clinical outcomes database that is utilized by a growing network of CI centers can help strengthen research through aggregate data sharing.

Extrusion of a cochlear implant positioner through the tympanic membrane in a pediatric patient: management of a delayed complication.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present a case of an extruded Advanced Bionics positioner, with the goal of educating a new generation of otologic surgeons on management of the delayed complications associated with this cochlear implant model. METHODS: Retrospective case report in a pediatric patient. RESULTS: We observed the extrusion of an Advanced Bionics positioner 10 years after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: Awareness of the Advanced Bionics positioner as a component of certain historical models of cochlear implants is important as the delayed complications associated with this model may still be encountered. Management of an extruded positioner should include precautions against infectious complications, repair of the defect, and assessment of the patient's performance with the cochlear implant.

Assessing joint attention and symbolic play in children with cochlear implants and multiple disabilities: two case studies.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of disabilities in addition to deafness poses unique challenges for evaluating outcomes in young children who receive cochlear implants. We describe two cases in which measures of joint attention and symbolic play contributed to our understanding of progress in language acquisition following implantation for children with additional developmental disabilities. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Case 1, identified with global developmental delays and implanted at age of 2 years 8 months; Case 2, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and implanted at age of 4 years 4 months. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Communication assessments were conducted using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales and the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories before implantation (baseline) and at 12 months postimplant. Children were also videotaped during a 10-minute free play with their mothers (Joint Attention task) and 5-minute solitary play (Symbolic Play task) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postimplant. Videotapes were coded for child attention and play states. RESULTS: The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories provided important information regarding both children's emerging joint attention and symbolic play skills that are typically not assessed by direct measures of early child language. Videotaped parent-child interaction revealed qualitative differences in the nature of these children's attention and play, which has important implications for intervention. CONCLUSION: For these two children, obtaining developmental information from various sources, including precursor skills to the development of oral language, provided a more complete picture of each child than conventional clinician-elicited language assessments alone.

Clinical performance of children following revision surgery for a cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the causes for revision surgery and to compare clinical performance before and after surgery in children who required electrode reinsertion. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Soundfield thresholds and speech recognition scores were compared before device failure and following electrode reinsertion. Temporal bones from a deceased adult implant user who underwent bilateral revision implantation were analyzed. RESULTS: Histopathology in the adult temporal bones revealed new bone formation in the scala tympani and substantially reduced spiral ganglion counts, with open-set speech recognition realized. Of 28 children undergoing revision surgery, 18 required electrode reinsertion. With the exception of 1 patient with severe cochlear malformation, new electrode arrays were fully inserted without difficulty. Clinical outcomes between pre-device failure and post-electrode reinsertion did not differ statistically. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Electrode reinsertion is technically feasible in the pediatric population. The majority of children recover their prerevision clinical performance. EBM RATING: C-4.