Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1481(1): 72-89, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32812261

ABSTRACT

Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has previously been a routine indication for esophagectomy. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy have resulted in a shift away from surgery. Current international guidelines recommend endoscopic therapy for BE with HGD irrespective of recurrence or progression of dysplasia. Current guidelines do not address the ongoing role of esophagectomy as an adjunct in the setting of failed endoscopic therapy. This review examines the role of esophagectomy as an adjunct to endoscopy in the management of patients with BE and HGD, with a specific focus on patients with persistent, progressive, or recurrent disease, disease resistant to endoscopic therapy, in patients with concomitant esophageal pathology, and in those patients in whom lifelong surveillance may not be possible or desired.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy , Esophagoscopy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 87(5): 334-338, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27598241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in pregnancy is associated with higher rates of foetal loss when compared to open appendicectomy (OA). However, the influence of gestational age and maternal age, both recognized risk factors for foetal loss, was not assessed. METHOD: This was a multicentre retrospective review of all pregnant patients who underwent appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis from 2000 to 2012 across seven hospitals in Australia. Perioperative data and foetal outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Data on 218 patients from the seven hospitals were included in the analysis. A total of 125 underwent LA and 93 OA. There were seven (5.6%) foetal losses in the LA group, six of which occurred in the first trimester, and none in the OA group. After matching using propensity scores, the estimated risk difference was 5.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4%, 9.8%). First trimester patients were more likely to undergo LA (84%), while those in the third were more likely to undergo OA (85%). Preterm delivery rates (6.8% LA versus 8.6% OA; CI: -12.6%, 5.3%) and hospital length of stay (3.7 days LA versus 4.5 days OA; CI: -1.3, 0.2 days) were similar. CONCLUSION: This is the largest published dataset investigating the outcome after LA versus OA while adjusting for gestational and maternal age. OA appears to be a safer approach for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Pregnancy Complications/surgery , Adult , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Appendectomy/statistics & numerical data , Appendicitis/complications , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Fetal Death/etiology , Gestational Age , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor, Premature/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...