Patient-centered design in developing a mobile application for oral anticancer medications.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the usability and feasibility of a customizable mobile application (app) designed to help educate patients about their oral anticancer medications (OAMs) and regimens. SETTING: Outpatient cancer center and oncology pharmacy for urban, Midwestern academic health system. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Clinically-supervised educational intervention to support patients learning about OAMs. PRACTICE INNOVATION: With input from patient partners, our interdisciplinary team designed the first known tablet-based educational app that can interface with a patient's electronic medical record. The app is based on learning style and adherence theories and is customizable for individually prescribed OAMs. The app can accommodate multiple learning styles through text at 6th-grade reading level, pictures, animations, and audio voiceovers. Functionalities include interactive educational modules on 11 OAMs and case-based patient stories on common barriers to OAM adherence. EVALUATION: Early phase testing provided the opportunity to observe the user interface with the app and app functionality. Data were summarized descriptively from observations and comments of patient subjects. RESULTS: Thirty patient subjects provided input-19 in phase 1 usability testing and 11 in phase 2 feasibility testing. Comments provided by patient subjects during usability testing were largely positive. Responses included self-identification with patient stories, usefulness of drug information, preferences for text messages, and app limitations (e.g., perceived generational digital divide in technology use and potential patient inability to receive text messages). Using their feedback, modifications were made to the prototype app. Responses in feasibility testing demonstrated the app's usefulness across a wide range of ages. Highest opinion ratings on app usefulness were stated by patients who were newer to OAM therapy. CONCLUSION: User feedback suggests the potential benefit of the app as a tool to help patients with cancer, particularly after the first months for those starting new OAM regimens. Processes and lessons learned are transferable to other settings.

Collaborative Physician-Pharmacist-Managed Multiple Myeloma Clinic Improves Guideline Adherence and Prevents Treatment Delays.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that a multidisciplinary collaborative physician-pharmacist multiple myeloma clinic would improve adherence to treatment and supportive care guidelines as well as reduce delays in receiving oral antimyeloma therapy. METHODS: From March 2014 to February 2015, an oncology pharmacist provided consultation for all patients in a specialist myeloma clinic. This included reviewing medications, ensuring physician adherence to supportive care guidelines, managing treatment-related adverse effects, and navigating issues involving access to oral specialty medications (collaborative clinic). RESULTS: Outcome measures were retrospectively compared with those of patients being treated by the same physician during the previous year, in which ad hoc pharmacist consultation was available upon request (traditional clinic). The collaborative clinic led to significant improvements in adherence to supportive medications, such as bisphosphonates (96% v 68%; P < .001), calcium and vitamin D (100% v 41%; P < .001), acyclovir (100% v 58%; P < .001), and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis (100% v 50%; P < .001). Appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in immunomodulatory drug-treated patients was prescribed in 100% versus 83% of cases ( P = .0035). The median time to initiation of bisphosphonate (5.5 v 97.5 days; P < .001) and P jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis after autologous transplantation was shortened in the collaborative clinic (11 v 40.5 days; P < .001). Furthermore, the number (85% v 21%; P < .001) and duration (7 v 15 days; P = .002) of delays in obtaining immunomodulatory drug therapy were also significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Our collaborative clinic model could potentially be applied to other practice sites to improve the management of patients with multiple myeloma. Prospective studies analyzing clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost effectiveness of this approach are warranted.

Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications: Evolving Interprofessional Roles and Pharmacist Workforce Considerations.

Interprofessional care is exhibited in outpatient oncology practices where practitioners from a myriad of specialties (e.g., oncology, nursing, pharmacy, health informatics and others) work collectively with patients to enhance therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects. Historically, most ambulatory-based anticancer medication therapies have been administrated in infusion clinics or physician offices. Oral anticancer medications (OAMs) have become increasingly prevalent and preferred by patients for use in residential or other non-clinic settings. Self-administration of OAMs represents a significant shift in the management of cancer care and role responsibilities for patients and clinicians. While patients have a greater sense of empowerment and convenience when taking OAMs, adherence is a greater challenge than with intravenous therapies. This paper proposes use of a qualitative systems evaluation, based on theoretical frameworks for interdisciplinary team collaboration and systems science, to examine the social interactionism involved with the use of intravenous anticancer treatments and OAMs (as treatment technologies) by describing patient, organizational, and social systems considerations in communication, care, control, and context (i.e., Kaplan's 4Cs). This conceptualization can help the healthcare system prepare for substantial workforce changes in cancer management, including increased utilization of oncology pharmacists.

Design of Customized Mobile Application for Patient Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications Utilizing User-Centered Design.

Adherence and compliance to oral anticancer medications (OAMs) can be challenging for patients due to their complex regimens. The goal of this research project was to design an effective and engaging user interface (UI), based on user-centered design (UCD) and incorporate animations, to reinforce and improve patient's understanding of the key aspects of taking OAMs. This current paper encompasses the development process and describes the initial phase of the project, which focused on the design and development of the tablet-based educational application (app). A UCD approach was implemented by consulting with oncology clinicians and patients at an early stage of development. Animations were developed and incorporated to convey complex medical concepts and information. An iterative design process will help ensure that the tool is customized for patient engagement.

Oral Targeted Therapies and Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases.

The purpose of our review is to summarize the clinical activity of oral targeted agents against brain metastases. This includes BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib and vemurafenib), human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (lapatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib), multi-kinase angiogenesis inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and vandetanib), and ALK/c-MET (crizotinib) and ALK/IGF-1 (ceritinib) inhibitors. Effective systemic therapies are needed for long-term benefit in brain metastases and documentation of intracranial activity for many therapies is poor. Our review provides a summary of the literature with pertinent data for clinicians. This is needed as subjects with brain metastases are often prevented from enrolling in clinical trials and investigations focused on systemic therapies for brain metastases are rare.

Evaluation of a clinical scoring scale to direct early appropriate therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse effect associated with heparin therapy. Current laboratory confirmation for immune mediated HIT often results in false positives and unnecessary treatment, exposing individuals to possible complications. As a result, clinical evaluation has been recommended in conjunction with laboratory testing. We hypothesize that utilization of a clinical scoring scale, the 4T's, will result in the initial appropriate therapy for suspected HIT. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 108 patients who underwent ELISA testing for HIT at a university hospital. The 4T's scale was applied, stratifying individuals into low, intermediate, and high-risk categories. Each risk score was compared to the ELISA results to determine if the 4T's can predict the diagnosis of HIT and result in appropriate management. ELISA optical density scores as well as incidence of adverse events were also compared among risk categories. STUDY RESULTS: Individuals with low risk correlate with a negative ELISA compared to intermediate and high-risk individuals (p = 0.01 and p<0.01) and also were significantly more likely to predict institution of appropriate therapy (p<0.01). Median optical density scores were 0.184 (0.046-2.116), 0.226 (0.067-1.887), and 0.476 (0.096-1.309) for low, intermediate, and high 4T scores. Major adverse events include thrombosis and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with low risk were more likely to receive initial, appropriate therapy and were also significantly more likely to have a negative ELISA test result. Individuals with low risk determined by the 4T score therefore may have therapy and serologic testing for HIT withheld.