Endovascular repair of a traumatic infrarenal aortic transection: a case report and review.

Blunt abdominal aortic trauma occurs in up to 0.04% of all nonpenetrating traumas. Although uncommon, mortality from this injury ranges from 18% to 37%. Seat belt injury is associated with almost 50% of reported blunt abdominal aortic traumas. The authors present the case of a 21-year-old man, a restrained passenger who was involved in a high-speed motor vehicle accident. In the emergency room, he had obvious evidence of lap-belt injury. His peripheral pulses were normal and there was no pulsatile abdominal mass. Computer tomography (CT) revealed a large amount of free intraperitoneal fluid throughout with signs of mesenteric avulsion and fracture/dislocation of T11-T12. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Right hemicolectomy and resection of small bowel was performed. CT angiography revealed an aortic transection and surrounding pseudoaneurysm 2 cm above the aortic bifurcation. The patient returned to the operating room for endovascular repair. Via a right femoral cutdown, a 14 mm x 5.5 cm stent-graft was placed across the distal abdominal aorta. Follow-up arteriogram revealed complete obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm without evidence of leak. There were no complications related to the aortic stent-graft in the postoperative period. The patient was discharged in good condition. As this case demonstrates, endovascular repair of traumatic aortic injury is feasible and may represent an improved treatment in certain settings.

The durability of endoscopic saphenous vein grafts: a 5-year observational study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest has been explored as a minimally invasive alternative to a long continuous leg incision for removal of the greater saphenous vein. The endoscopic technique uses limited incisions (2-4) with extended "skin bridges" and videoscopic equipment for the dissection and removal of the greater saphenous vein. This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term durability of saphenous vein grafts harvested by an endoscopic technique and used for lower extremity arterial revascularization. METHODS: All patients who underwent endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for lower extremity arterial bypass grafting were prospectively followed for graft patency and risk factors. Grafts were surveyed with serial duplex scans at 3- to 6-month intervals over this 5-year study. Life-table methods were used to assess graft survival. A computerized registry and medical records were reviewed to determine graft patency and patient survival. RESULTS: From September 1994 to August 2000, 164 lower extremity arterial saphenous vein grafts harvested by an endoscopic technique were used for lower extremity arterial bypass grafting in 150 patients. The patient population included 111 males (75%) and 112 smokers (75%), but also included a high-risk cohort of 65 diabetic patients (43%) and 15 patients undergoing dialysis/renal transplant (10%). Twenty-eight patients (19%) died within the study period. With life-table methods, 1-, 3-, and 5-year secondary patency rates were 85% (+/- 3.2%), 74% (+/- 5.7%), and 68% (+/- 11.6%). Of the 30 failed grafts, 7 (4%) failed in the first month related to inadequate runoff (4), cardiac instability (2), and an additional surgical procedure (1). Twenty-three grafts (14%) failed between 1 and 42 months. Twenty-two (16%) of these 134 patent grafts underwent a second procedure to maintain patency (13 as primary-assisted patency and 9 as secondary patency). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest for lower extremity arterial reconstruction provides a satisfactory conduit for lower extremity bypass grafting. Although increased manipulation from this limited access technique may incite an injury response in the vein, these vein grafts can maintain an adequate patency for lower extremity bypass grafting.

Telemedicine in vascular surgery: feasibility of digital imaging for remote management of wounds.

PURPOSE: Telemedicine coupled with digital photography could potentially improve the quality of outpatient wound care and decrease medical cost by allowing home care nurses to electronically transmit images of patients' wounds to treating surgeons. To determine the feasibility of this technology, we compared bedside wound examination by onsite surgeons with viewing digital images of wounds by remote surgeons. METHODS: Over 6 weeks, 38 wounds in 24 inpatients were photographed with a Kodak DC50 digital camera (resolution 756 x 504 pixels/in2). Agreements regarding wound description (edema, erythema, cellulitis, necrosis, gangrene, ischemia, and granulation) and wound management (presence of healing problems, need for emergent evaluation, need for antibiotics, and need for hospitalization) were calculated among onsite surgeons and between onsite and remote surgeons. Sensitivity and specificity of remote wound diagnosis compared with bedside examination were calculated. Potential correlates of agreement, level of surgical training, certainty of diagnosis, and wound type were evaluated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Agreement between onsite and remote surgeons (66% to 95% for wound description and 64% to 95% for wound management) matched agreement among onsite surgeons (64% to 85% for wound description and 63% to 91% for wound management). Moreover, when onsite agreement was low (i.e., 64% for erythema) agreement between onsite and remote surgeons was similarly low (i.e., 66% for erythema). Sensitivity of remote diagnosis ranged from 78% (gangrene) to 98% (presence of wound healing problem), whereas specificity ranged from 27% (erythema) to 100% (ischemia). Agreement was influenced by wound type (p < 0.01) but not by certainty of diagnosis (p > 0.01) or level of surgical training (p > 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Wound evaluation on the basis of viewing digital images is comparable with standard wound examination and renders similar diagnoses and treatment in the majority of cases. Digital imaging for remote wound management is feasible and holds significant promise for improving outpatient vascular wound care.

Surgery-specific considerations in the cardiac patient undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Myocardial infarction after noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease results from the interplay of patient-specific, anesthetic-specific, and surgery-specific factors. Surgery-specific factors include the stress response to injury, both neurohormonal and hemostatic alterations, and clinically-significant operative parameters such as urgency, duration, blood loss, body core temperature, fluid shifts, and location of surgery. The impact of these factors bears out during the entire perioperative period and influences preoperative risk assessment, cardiac evaluation and intervention, intraoperative strategy, and postoperative management. Overall, the morbidity and mortality of surgery is minimal even in high-risk patients, and the contribution of surgery-specific factors to operative risk is subtle compared with that of patient specific-factors such as severity of coronary disease and other comorbid conditions. Nonetheless, the optimal surgical management of patients with coronary disease requires the collaborative effort of the anesthesiologist, cardiologist, and surgeon.

Gastrointestinal transit during endotoxemia: the role of nitric oxide.

We hypothesized that the disrupted gastrointestinal transit that occurs during endotoxemia is mediated by nitric oxide (NO) and that the inhibition of NO synthesis will normalize intestinal transit and gastric emptying. To determine the effects of endotoxin and steroids on the activity of gastrointestinal smooth muscle NO synthase, rats underwent placement of an intravenous (iv) line and then were given Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) 10 mg/kg/iv; LPS, 10 mg/kg/iv + dexamethasone, 3 mg/kg/iv; or saline. The activity of nitric oxide synthase in the stomach, small intestine, and colon were determined by measuring the conversion of L-[3H]arginine to L-[3H]citrulline. To determine intestinal transit and gastric emptying, gavage feedings of nonabsorbable liquid markers were given and rats divided into eight groups: 0.9% NaCl, 1 ml/hr x 5 hr (control); LPS, 10 mg/kg/iv; LPS + N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 10 mg/kg/hr x 5 hr; LPS + N-omega-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME), 10 mg/kg/hr x 5 hr; LPS + L-arginine, 100 mg/kg/hr x 5 hr; LPS + L+NAME + L-arginine; LPS + N-omega-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) 10 mg/kg/hr; or LPS + L-NNA + L-arginine. LPS increased the enzymatic activity of both the constitutive and the inducible forms of NO synthase in the small intestine and fundus of the stomach. The acceleration of intestinal transit produced by endotoxemia was reversed with both L-NAME and L-NNA but not with D-NAME. Endotoxemia slowed gastric emptying but this effect was not reversed with either L-NAME or L-NNA. We conclude that NO plays a major role in mediating the rapid intestinal transit during endotoxemia.

Increased prostacyclin and adverse hemodynamic responses to protamine sulfate in an experimental canine model.

Prostanoid activity was correlated with the hemodynamic effects of protamine sulfate reversal of heparin in 24 dogs undergoing three different pretreatment regimens: Group I (n = 8) received saline, Group II (n = 8) received the thromboxane synthetase inhibitor U63,557A (30 mg/kg), and Group III (n = 8) received indomethacin (10 mg/kg). Pretreatment substances were administered as 5-min intravenous infusions 20 min before anticoagulation with intravenous heparin (150 IU/kg). Protamine sulfate (1.5 mg/kg) was subsequently given as a 10-sec intravenous infusion 30 min after heparin had been administered. Hemodynamic data, as well as prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane (TxA2) activity in aortic, venous, and pulmonary artery blood samples, were assessed over a 30-min time period following protamine administration. Group III indomethacin pretreatment provided the most protection from declines in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, venous oxygen saturation, oxygen consumption, and elevations in pulmonary pressures and was accompanied with actual declines in PGI2. Group II U63,557A pretreatment was associated with the most severe hemodynamic changes and the greatest increase in PGI2 (+576%). Elevated PGI2 correlated with hypotension at 1 and 3 min (P less than 0.01), as well as pulmonary artery pressure declines at all times following protamine reversal. TxA2 changes did not correlate with hemodynamic changes. Protamine's adverse hemodynamic responses were attenuated with cyclooxygenase blockade by indomethacin, but were worsened with selective TxA2 blockade with U63,557A. Excess arachadonic acid precursors in the latter setting may increase PGI2 production. This study, for the first time, raises the possibility that PGI2 contributes to the adverse effects accompanying protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation.