Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 25(5): 439-444, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617692

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to describe the supraclavicular flap and its utility in head and neck reconstruction in the context of recent studies. RECENT FINDINGS: Current literature regarding the supraclavicular flap has described its expanded uses in a variety of head and neck reconstructive settings. Its reliability and limited morbidity have been well demonstrated, and it has been cited as a reasonable alternative to other reconstructive options including, in some situations, free tissue transfer. SUMMARY: The supraclavicular flap has shown dependability in reconstruction of defects in the head and neck, and it warrants consideration among reconstructive surgeons, especially for circumstances in which free tissue or other pedicled flaps are less than ideal.


Subject(s)
Neck/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 49(6): 1399-1414, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27742106

ABSTRACT

Surgical intervention for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a complex topic. The discussion involves intricate procedures targeting specific areas of the upper airway. Because of the wide variety of physiologic and anatomic causes of this disorder it is important to tailor the treatment to offer the patient the best possible outcome. Genioglossus, hyoid, and tongue base procedures should be considered among theses treatment options.


Subject(s)
Glossectomy , Hyoid Bone/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Tongue/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Humans
4.
Am J Perinatol ; 33(6): 531-4, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26906186

ABSTRACT

Oral clefting is one of the most common significant fetal abnormalities. Cleft lip and cleft palate have drastically different clinical ramifications and management from one another. A cleft of the alveolus (with or without cleft lip) can confuse the diagnostic picture and lead to a false assumption of cleft palate. The cleft alveolus should be viewed on the spectrum of cleft lip rather than be associated with cleft palate. This is made evident by understanding the embryological development of the midface and relevant terminology. Cleft alveolus carries significantly different clinical implications and treatment options than that of cleft palate. Accurately distinguishing cleft alveolus from cleft palate is crucial for appropriate discussions regarding the patient's care.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process/abnormalities , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Alveolar Process/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods , Cleft Lip/embryology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/embryology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Gingiva/transplantation , Humans , Infant , Lip/anatomy & histology , Palate/anatomy & histology , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
5.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 154(4): 731-4, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26884371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long-term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A tertiary pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS: Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma. METHODS: Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days. CONCLUSION: This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.


Subject(s)
Device Removal , Tracheostomy/instrumentation , Adolescent , Bronchoscopy , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Protocols , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Laryngoscopy , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...