Guillain-Barré syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an international prospective cohort study.

In the wake of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, an increasing number of patients with neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported following this infection. It remains unclear, however, if these cases are coincidental or not, as most publications were case reports or small regional retrospective cohort studies. The International GBS Outcome Study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with GBS within 2 weeks from onset of weakness. Data from patients included in this study, between 30 January 2020 and 30 May 2020, were used to investigate clinical and laboratory signs of a preceding or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe the associated clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients were classified according to the SARS-CoV-2 case definitions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and laboratory recommendations of the World Health Organization. Forty-nine patients with GBS were included, of whom eight (16%) had a confirmed and three (6%) a probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nine of these 11 patients had no serological evidence of other recent preceding infections associated with GBS, whereas two had serological evidence of a recent Campylobacter jejuni infection. Patients with a confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently had a sensorimotor variant 8/11 (73%) and facial palsy 7/11 (64%). The eight patients who underwent electrophysiological examination all had a demyelinating subtype, which was more prevalent than the other patients included in the same time window [14/30 (47%), P = 0.012] as well as historical region and age-matched control subjects included in the International GBS Outcome Study before the pandemic [23/44 (52%), P = 0.016]. The median time from the onset of infection to neurological symptoms was 16 days (interquartile range 12-22). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection shared uniform neurological features, similar to those previously described in other post-viral GBS patients. The frequency (22%) of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population was higher than estimates of the contemporaneous background prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, which may be a result of recruitment bias during the pandemic, but could also indicate that GBS may rarely follow a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous studies, we found no increase in patient recruitment during the pandemic for our ongoing International GBS Outcome Study compared to previous years, making a strong relationship of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 unlikely. A case-control study is required to determine if there is a causative link or not.

Second intravenous immunoglobulin dose in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis (SID-GBS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with one standard dose (2 g/kg) of intravenous immunoglobulin is insufficient in a proportion of patients with severe Guillain-Barré syndrome. Worldwide, around 25% of patients severely affected with the syndrome are given a second intravenous immunoglobulin dose (SID), although it has not been proven effective. We aimed to investigate whether a SID is effective in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with a predicted poor outcome. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (SID-GBS), we included patients (≥12 years) with Guillain-Barré syndrome admitted to one of 59 participating hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included on the first day of standard intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (2 g/kg over 5 days). Only patients with a poor prognosis (score of ≥6) according to the modified Erasmus Guillain-Barré syndrome Outcome Score were randomly assigned, via block randomisation stratified by centre, to SID (2 g/kg over 5 days) or to placebo, 7-9 days after inclusion. Patients, outcome adjudicators, monitors, and the steering committee were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the Guillain-Barré syndrome disability score 4 weeks after inclusion. All patients in whom allocated trial medication was started were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 2224/NL2107. FINDINGS: Between Feb 16, 2010, and June 5, 2018, 327 of 339 patients assessed for eligibility were included. 112 had a poor prognosis. Of those, 93 patients with a poor prognosis were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 49 (53%) received SID and 44 (47%) received placebo. The adjusted common odds ratio for improvement on the Guillain-Barré syndrome disability score at 4 weeks was 1·4 (95% CI 0·6-3·3; p=0·45). Patients given SID had more serious adverse events (35% vs 16% in the first 30 days), including thromboembolic events, than those in the placebo group. Four patients died in the intervention group (13-24 weeks after randomisation). INTERPRETATION: Our study does not provide evidence that patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with a poor prognosis benefit from a second intravenous immunoglobulin course; moreover, it entails a risk of serious adverse events. Therefore, a second intravenous immunoglobulin course should not be considered for treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome because of a poor prognosis. The results indicate the need for treatment trials with other immune modulators in patients severely affected by Guillain-Barré syndrome. FUNDING: Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds and Sanquin Plasma Products.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in clinical practice: A survey among Dutch neurologists.

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is often a challenge. The clinical presentation is diverse, accurate biomarkers are lacking, and the best strategy to initiate and maintain treatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine how neurologists diagnose and treat CIDP. We conducted a cross-sectional survey on diagnostic and treatment practices among Dutch neurologists involved in the clinical care of CIDP patients. Forty-four neurologists completed the survey (44/71; 62%). The respondents indicated to use the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 CIDP guideline for the diagnosis in 77% and for treatment in 50%. Only 57% of respondents indicated that the presence of demyelinating electrophysiological findings was mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of CIDP. Most neurologists used intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) as first choice treatment, but the indications to start, optimize, or withdraw IVIg, and the use of other immune-modulatory therapies varied. University-affiliated respondents used the EFNS/PNS 2010 diagnostic criteria, nerve imaging tools, and immunosuppressive drugs more often. Despite the existence of an international guideline, there is considerable variation among neurologists in the strategies employed to diagnose and treat CIDP. More specific recommendations regarding: (a) the minimal set of electrophysiological requirements to diagnose CIDP, (b) the possible added value of nerve imaging, especially in patients not meeting the electrodiagnostic criteria, (c) the most relevant serological examinations, and (d) the clear treatment advice, in the new EFNS/PNS guideline, would likely support its implementation in clinical practice.

Meralgia paresthetica: Nerve stimulator-guided injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Meralgia paresthetica is a mononeuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. A common therapy is injection with corticosteroids. The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine vs placebo. METHODS: After randomization, 10 patients received a nerve stimulator-guided injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine, and 10 patients received saline. The primary outcome measure was pain (visual analogue scale, VAS). RESULTS: In the placebo group, there was a significant pain reduction (baseline VAS, 6.8; VAS week 12, 4.3; P = .014). The VAS score in the methylprednisolone group did not show a significant reduction (baseline VAS, 7.4; VAS week 12, 4.8; P = .053). There was no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no objective evidence for benefit from nerve stimulator-guided injection with corticosteroids in meralgia paresthetica, although this study is limited by a small sample size. Future placebo-controlled studies using ultrasound-guided injection are warranted.

[Bell's palsy: different doctor, different care?] / Bellse parese: andere dokter, andere zorg?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic work-up and treatment strategy of Bell's palsy by: general practitioners (GPs); ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialists; and neurologists in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHOD: GPs, ENT specialists and neurologists were asked to participate in an online survey on the diagnosis and treatment of Bell's palsy. Results per specialty were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 415 clinicians participated, including 149 GPs, 123 ENT specialists, and 143 neurologists. The answers from the three disciplines showed significant differences concerning history taking, physical examination, alarm symptoms, treatment strategy and follow-up. ENT specialists more frequently asked about hearing loss (90%), whereas neurologists enquired about weakness in arms and legs (62%). GPs less often ask about tick bites than clinicians in ENT and neurology, respectively (36% vs. 89% and 71%). Neurologists rarely performed otoscopy (21%), but more frequently tested eye movements (78%) than GPs (33%) and ENT specialists (20%). Compared to GPs and neurologist, ENT specialists more frequently reported the supplementation of Prednisone treatment with antiviral agents (45% vs. 9% and 6 % resp.). Furthermore, the time interval to the follow-up visit varied strongly between clinicians, ranging between a few days to six weeks after the first clinic visit. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the diagnostic work-up and treatment strategy for Bell's palsy in the Netherlands is highly dependent on the clinician's specialty. Despite the fact that equivalent guidelines are in place, GPs, ENT specialists and neurologists gave different answers to questions concerning diagnostics and treatment. This finding suggests that more attention should be paid to the implementation of and adherence to the multidisciplinary guideline for Bell's palsy.

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis is strongly associated with HLA-DR7 and HLA-DRB4.

Leucine-rich glioma-inactivated1 (LGI1) encephalitis is an antibody-associated inflammation of the limbic area. An autoimmune etiology is suspected but not yet proven. We performed human leukocyte antigen (HLA) analysis in 25 nontumor anti-LGI1 patients and discovered a remarkably strong HLA association. HLA-DR7 was present in 88% compared to 19.6% in healthy controls (p = 4.1 × 10-11 ). HLA-DRB4 was present in all patients and in 46.5% controls (p = 1.19 × 10-7 ). These findings support the autoimmune hypothesis. An exploratory analysis was performed in a small group of 4 tumor-LGI1 patients. The strong HLA association seems not applicable in these patients. Therefore, the absence of HLA-DR7 or HLA-DRB4 could raise tumor suspicion in anti-LGI1 patients. Ann Neurol 2017;81:193-198.

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: Clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: This nationwide study gives a detailed description of the clinical features and long-term outcome of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis. METHODS: We collected patients prospectively from October 2013, and retrospectively from samples sent to our laboratory from January 2007. LGI1 antibodies were confirmed with both cell-based assay and immunohistochemistry. Clinical information was obtained in interviews with patients and their relatives and from medical records. Initial MRI and follow-up MRI were revised blindly. Neuropsychological assessment was performed in those patients with follow-up over 2 years. RESULTS: Annual incidence in the Netherlands was 0.83/million. A total of 34/38 patients had a limbic encephalitis. Subtle focal seizures (66%, autonomic or dyscognitive) and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS, 47%) mostly occurred before onset of memory disturbance. Later in the disease course, 63% had tonic-clonic seizures. Initial MRI showed hippocampal T2 hyperintensity in 74% of the patients. These lesions evolved regularly into mesial temporal sclerosis (44%). Substantial response to immunotherapy was seen in 80%, with early response of seizures and slow recovery of cognition. At follow-up ≥2 years, most surviving patients reported mild residual cognitive deficit with spatial disorientation. A total of 86% had persistent amnesia for the disease period. Relapses were common (35%) and presented up to 8 years after initial disease. Two-year case fatality rate was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-LGI1 encephalitis is a homogenous clinical syndrome, showing early FBDS and other focal seizures with subtle clinical manifestations, followed by memory disturbances. Better recognition will lead to earlier diagnosis, essential for prompt start of treatment. Long-term outcome of surviving patients is mostly favorable, but relapses are common.

The clinical spectrum of Caspr2 antibody-associated disease.

OBJECTIVE: To report a large cohort of patients with antibodies against contactin-associated protein-like 2 (Caspr2) and provide the clinical spectrum of this disorder. METHODS: Serum and CSF samples were assessed at 2 neuroimmunology centers in Barcelona and Rotterdam. Patients were included if Caspr2 antibodies were confirmed with 2 independent techniques, including brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assay. Clinical information was obtained by the authors or provided by treating physicians after patients' informed consent. RESULTS: Median age at symptom onset was 66 years. Of 38 patients, 34 were male. Median time to nadir of disease was 4 months (in 30% >1 year). The most frequent syndromes included limbic encephalitis (42%) and Morvan syndrome (29%). Seventy-seven percent of the patients had ≥3 of the following symptoms: encephalopathy (cognitive deficits/seizures), cerebellar dysfunction, peripheral nervous system hyperexcitability, dysautonomia, insomnia, neuropathic pain, or weight loss. A tumor, mostly thymoma, occurred in 19% of the patients. Immunoglobulin G4 subclass antibodies were present in all patients; 63% also had immunoglobulin G1 antibodies. Treatment response occurred in 93% of the patients and 25% had clinical relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Caspr2 antibodies associate with a treatable disorder that predominantly affects elderly men. The resulting syndrome may vary among patients but it usually includes a set of well-established symptoms. Recognition of this spectrum of symptoms and consideration of the protracted clinical course are important for early diagnosis of this disorder. Prompt immunotherapy and tumor therapy (if needed) often result in improvement.

The relevance of VGKC positivity in the absence of LGI1 and Caspr2 antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical relevance of a positive voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) test in patients lacking antibodies to LGI1 and Caspr2. METHODS: VGKC-positive patients were tested for LGI1 and Caspr2 antibodies. Patients lacking both antibodies were matched (1:2) to VGKC-negative patients. Clinical and paraclinical criteria were used to blindly determine evidence for autoimmune inflammation in both groups. Patients with an inconclusive VGKC titer were analyzed in the same way. RESULTS: A total of 1,455 patients were tested by VGKC radioimmunoassay. Fifty-six patients tested positive, 50 of whom were available to be included. Twenty-five patients had antibodies to LGI1 (n = 19) or Caspr2 (n = 6) and 25 patients lacked both antibodies. Evidence for autoimmune inflammation was present in 7 (28%) of the VGKC-positive patients lacking LGI1 and Caspr2, compared to 9 (18%) of the VGKC-negative controls (p = 0.38). Evidence for autoimmune inflammation was mainly found in patients with limbic encephalitis/encephalomyelitis (57%), but not in other clinical phenotypes (5%, p < 0.01). VGKC titers were significantly higher in patients with antibodies to LGI1 or Caspr2 (p < 0.001). However, antibodies to Caspr2 could also be detected in patients with inconclusive low VGKC titer, while many VGKC-positive patients had no evidence for autoimmune inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: VGKC positivity in the absence of antibodies to LGI1 and Caspr2 is not a clear marker for autoimmune inflammation and seems not to contribute in clinical practice. No cutoff value for the VGKC titer was appropriate to discriminate between patients with and without autoimmune inflammation.

Overlapping demyelinating syndromes and anti­N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical, radiological, and immunological association of demyelinating disorders with anti­Nmethyl- D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. METHODS: Clinical and radiological analysis was done of a cohort of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Determination of antibodies to NMDAR, aquaporin-4 (AQP4), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) was performed using brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had prominent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or clinical features of demyelination. Group 1 included 12 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis was preceded or followed by independent episodes of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (5 cases, 4 anti-AQP4 positive) or brainstem or multifocal demyelinating syndromes (7 cases, all anti-MOG positive). Group 2 included 11 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurred simultaneously with MRI and symptoms compatible with demyelination (5 AQ4 positive, 2 MOG positive). Group 3 (136 controls) included 50 randomly selected patients with typical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 56 with NMO, and 30 with multiple sclerosis; NMDAR antibodies were detected only in the 50 anti-NMDAR patients, MOG antibodies in 3 of 50 anti-NMDAR and 1 of 56 NMO patients, and AQP4 antibodies in 48 of 56 NMO and 1 of 50 anti-NMDAR patients (p<0.0001 for all comparisons with Groups 1 and 2). Most patients improved with immunotherapy, but compared with anti-NMDAR encephalitis the demyelinating episodes required more intensive therapy and resulted in more residual deficits. Only 1 of 23 NMDAR patients with signs of demyelination had ovarian teratoma compared with 18 of 50 anti-NMDAR controls (p50.011). INTERPRETATION: Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis may develop concurrent or separate episodes of demyelinating disorders, and conversely patients with NMO or demyelinating disorders with atypical symptoms (eg, dyskinesias, psychosis) may have anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Accuracy of the ice test in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis in patients with ptosis.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the ice test in myasthenia gravis. All of the studies employed a case-control design, in which the diagnosis was already known at the time of the test for both patients and controls, leading to case selection bias. This suggests that the available literature substantially overestimates the diagnostic utility of these tests. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study without selection bias was performed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the ice test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ice test were determined by means of a 2 × 2 table. RESULTS: The ice test has a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.00), specificity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.56-1.00), PPV of 0.73 (95% CI 0.48-0.90), and NPV of 0.94 (95% CI 0.70-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Due to its high negative predictive value the ice test is still a reliable and useful bed-side test.

Paraneoplastic syndromes of the neuromuscular junction: therapeutic options in myasthenia gravis, lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome, and neuromyotonia.

OPINION STATEMENT: Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) and neuromyotonia are neuromuscular transmission disorders occurring with or without associated malignancy. Due to the common antibody-mediated pathophysiology, immunosuppression has an important role in the treatment of each of these disorders. Symptomatic treatment is more variable. Pyridostigmine is first-line treatment in generalized MG. Response seems to be better in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies than in patients with antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). Pyridostigmine can be sufficient in mild MG, although most patients need additional immunosuppressive therapy. If so, prednisolone is efficient in the majority of the patients, with a relatively early onset of clinical effect. High drug dosage and treatment duration should be limited as much as possible because of serious corticosteroid-related side effects. As long-term treatment is needed in most patients for sustainable remission, adding non-steroid immunosuppressive drugs should be considered. Their therapeutic response is usually delayed and often takes a period of several months. In the meantime, corticosteroids are continued and doses are tapered down over a period of several months. There are no trials comparing different immunosuppressive drugs. Choice is mainly based on the clinician's familiarity with certain drugs and their side effects, combined with patients' characteristics. Most commonly used is azathioprine. Alternatively, tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab can be used. The use of cyclophosphamide is limited to refractory cases, due to serious side effects. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin induce rapid but temporary improvement, and are reserved for severe disease exacerbations because of high costs of treatment. It is recommended that computed tomography (CT) of the thorax is performed in every AChR-positive MG patient, and that patients are referred for thymectomy in case of thymoma. In patients without thymoma, thymectomy can be considered as well, especially in younger, AChR-positive patients with severe disease. However, definite proof of benefit is lacking and an international randomized trial to clarify this topic is currently ongoing. When LEMS is suspected, always search for malignancy, especially small cell lung carcinoma with continued screening up to two years. In paraneoplastic LEMS, cancer treatment usually results in clinical improvement of the myasthenic symptoms. 3,4-Diaminopyridine is first-line symptomatic treatment in LEMS. It is usually well tolerated and effective. When immunosuppressive therapy is needed, the same considerations apply to LEMS as described for MG. Peripheral nerve hyperexcitability in neuromyotonia can be treated with anticonvulsant drugs such as phenytoin, valproic acid or carbamazepine. When response in insufficient, start prednisolone in mild disease and consider the addition of azathioprine. Plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin is indicated in severe neuromyotonia and in patients with neuromyotonia combined with central nervous system symptoms, a clinical picture known as Morvan's syndrome.

Ultrasound-guided steroid injection to treat mild ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

There exists no "gold standard" in the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). We treated 7 patients with mild UNE using a local steroid injection with ultrasonographic monitoring. At clinical follow-up after 6 weeks, 4 patients had improved, 2 were stable, and 1 reported an increase in symptoms. Ultrasound-guided steroid injection in mild UNE is safe and could be effective. Further investigation is needed to prove its efficacy.

Clinical Dutch-English Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) tumor association prediction score accurately predicts small-cell lung cancer in the LEMS.

PURPOSE: Approximately one half of patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) have small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLC), aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. In view of its profound impact on therapy and survival, we developed and validated a score to identify the presence of SCLC early in the course of LEMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We derived a prediction score for SCLC in LEMS in a nationwide cohort of 107 Dutch patients, and validated it in a similar cohort of 112 British patients. A Dutch-English LEMS Tumor Association Prediction (DELTA-P) score was developed based on multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Age at onset, smoking behavior, weight loss, Karnofsky performance status, bulbar involvement, male sexual impotence, and the presence of Sry-like high-mobility group box protein 1 serum antibodies were independent predictors for SCLC in LEMS. A DELTA-P score was derived allocating 1 point for the presence of each of the following items at or within 3 months from onset: age at onset ≥ 50 years, smoking at diagnosis, weight loss ≥ 5%, bulbar involvement, erectile dysfunction, and Karnofsky performance status lower than 70. The area under the curve of the receiver operating curve was 94.4% in the derivation cohort and 94.6% in the validation set. A DELTA-P score of 0 or 1 corresponded to a 0% to 2.6% chance of SCLC, whereas scores of 4, 5, and 6 corresponded to chances of SCLC of 93.5%, 96.6%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The simple clinical DELTA-P score discriminated patients with LEMS with and without SCLC with high accuracy early in the course of LEMS.

3,4-diaminopyridine for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

The Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is an autoimmune disease in which antibodies against voltage-gated calcium channels inhibit cholinergic neurotransmission. LEMS is clinically characterized by muscle weakness and autonomic dysfunction. 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) blocks potassium channels in nerve terminals, resulting in an increase in acetylcholine release. This article describes the four randomized placebo-controlled trials of 3,4-DAP in patients with LEMS. All trials demonstrated a significant effect on muscle strength and compound muscle action potential amplitude. Furthermore, the safety and tolerability of 3,4-DAP are reviewed. The side effects of 3,4-DAP are generally mild and most frequently consist of paresthesias, but epileptic seizures and arrhythmias have been described in patients using high doses. Given the efficacy and safety of 3,4-DAP in LEMS, this drug is the mainstay for symptomatic treatment of LEMS.

SOX antibodies in small-cell lung cancer and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: frequency and relation with survival.

PURPOSE: SOX1 antibodies are common in small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) with and without paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS) and can serve as serological tumor marker. Addition of other antibodies might improve its diagnostic power. We validated an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to assess the diagnostic value of serum antibodies in SCLC and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Clinical outcome with respect to SOX antibodies was evaluated, as the SOX-related antitumor immune response might help to control the tumor growth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used recombinant SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, SOX21, HuC, HuD, or HelN1 proteins in an ELISA to titrate serum samples and validated the assay by western blot. We tested 136 consecutive SCLC patients, 86 LEMS patients (43 with SCLC), 14 patients with SCLC and PNS (paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration or Hu syndrome), 62 polyneuropathy patients, and 18 healthy controls. RESULTS: Our ELISA was equally reliable as western blot. Forty-three percent of SCLC patients and 67% of SCLC-LEMS patients had antibodies to one of the SOX or Hu proteins. SOX antibodies had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 95% to discriminate between LEMS with SCLC and nontumor LEMS. No difference in survival was observed between SOX positive and SOX negative SCLC patients. CONCLUSION: SOX antibodies are specific serological markers for SCLC. Our assay is suitable for high throughput screening, detecting 43% of SCLC. SOX antibodies have diagnostic value in discriminating SCLC-LEMS from nontumor LEMS, but have no relation to survival in patients with SCLC.