Lean, nondiabetic Asian Indians have decreased insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance, and raised leptin compared to Caucasians and Chinese subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the insulin sensitivity of healthy, nondiabetic Asian Indians with that of two other ethnic groups (Caucasian and Chinese) living in Singapore. DESIGN: Study of insulin sensitivity using euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp. SUBJECTS: A total of 10 healthy, lean, young male subjects of each ethnic group, matched for age, body mass index (BMI) and physical activity. They all had normal glucose tolerance and had no family history of diabetes. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric parameters (BMI, waist-hip ratio (WHR) and percentage body fat (PBF)), fasting lipid profile and leptin concentration, insulin sensitivity index, and insulin clearance. RESULTS: Healthy lean (BMI 22.1+/-1.5 kg/m(2) (mean+/-s.d.)) Indians had significantly higher fasting serum leptin (5.1+/-2.5 vs Chinese 1.0+/-0.9 vs Caucasian 2.3+/-1.2 ng/ml; P<0.001), lower insulin sensitivity index (9.9+/-3.3 vs Chinese 14.1+/-3.5 vs Caucasian 18.8+/-9.2 mg/min kg fat-free mass/microU/ml; P<0.002), and lower insulin clearance (461.4+/-54.8 vs Chinese 621.0+/-99.3 vs Caucasian 646.9+/-49.2 ml/min m(2); P<0.001). Indians also had a higher PBF (26.5+/-5.2 vs Chinese 19.5+/-2.2 vs Caucasians 22.9+/-1.4%; P<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (P=0.036), fasting insulin (P<0.006) and fasting triglyceride (P=0.022). Stepwise regression analysis showed that ethnicity was the only significant independent determinant variable for the differences in insulin sensitivity index (P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Healthy lean nondiabetic Indians were more insulin resistant compared to other ethnic groups despite the similarity in living environment. These findings may warrant preventive health-care strategies for type II diabetes and coronary artery disease to target Indians at an earlier stage compared to other ethnic groups.

Clinical drug development--practical issues in clinical pharmacology studies.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical pharmacology refers to the study of the safety, pharmacodynamic activity, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of a drug in man. METHODS: Selected review of topics that provide guidance on practical issues for researchers conducting non-therapeutic investigational research in humans. RESULTS: Close attention to the issues highlighted is needed to ensure successful research in this area of drug development. Resources dedicated to the discipline can logically optimise efficiency and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing opportunity for clinical pharmacological research, offering an interesting career option to young physicians.

Overnight normalization of glucose concentrations improves hepatic but not extrahepatic insulin action in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes are both hyperglycemic and insulin resistant. To determine whether short term restoration of normoglycemia improves insulin action, hyperinsulinemic (approximately 300 pmol/L) euglycemic clamps were performed in diabetic subjects after either overnight infusion of saline or overnight infusion of insulin in amounts sufficient to maintain euglycemia throughout the night. Fasting glucose concentrations (5.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 11.9 +/- 1.4 mmol/L; P < 0.01) and rates of endogenous glucose production (13.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 18.6 +/- 1.6 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.05) were both lower after overnight insulin than overnight saline. Insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake (to 34.9 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.8 +/- 3.4 mumol/kg.min; P = 0.2) and inhibition of free fatty acids (to 0.13 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.04 mmol/L; P = 0.6) did not differ after overnight saline and overnight insulin. In contrast, endogenous glucose production during the final hour of the hyperinsulinemic clamps (i.e. when glucose concentrations were the same) remained higher (P = 0.05) after overnight saline than after overnight insulin (5.5 +/- 1.5 vs. 0.02 +/- 1.4 mumol/kg.min). Thus, acute restoration of euglycemia by means of an overnight insulin infusion improves hepatic (and perhaps renal) but not extrahepatic insulin action.

Dermal interstitial glucose as an indicator of ambient glycemia.

OBJECTIVE: Using a novel minimally invasive (< or = 1.4 mm) technique to sample minuscule (0.5 microliter) amounts of dermal interstitial fluid (ISF), we assessed the accuracy of its glucose concentrations in predicting concurrently measured venous plasma and capillary plasma glucose concentrations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 67 adult (37 male and 30 female) volunteers (57 with and 10 without diabetes) with venous plasma glucose levels from 1.6 to 28.4 mmol/l underwent forearm ISF, antecubetal venous, and fingertip capillary sampling. RESULTS: Rank correlations were 0.974 for ISF 1 vs. 2, 0.954 for ISF vs. venous, 0.935 for ISF vs. capillary, and 0.987 for venous vs. capillary. Median absolute differences were 0.53 mmol/l for ISF 1 vs. 2, 1.33 mmol/l for ISF vs. venous, 1.06 mmol/l for ISF vs. capillary, and 0.56 mmol/l for capillary vs. venous. Equations expressing ISF glucose as a function of venous and capillary glucose and equations expressing capillary glucose as a function of venous glucose had slopes of 0.995, 0.936, and 1.021, respectively (none significantly different from unity), and intercepts of 1.03 mmol/l (P = 0.024), 0.94 mmol/l (P = 0.131), and 0.56 mmol/l (P = 0.041), respectively. Error grid analysis of ISF vs. venous glucose and of capillary vs. venous glucose showed that 97% of the measurements fell within grids A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Dermal ISF sampling is a bloodless minimally invasive technique that provides a medium for glucose measurement, the concentrations of which closely reflect ambient glycemia to a degree comparable with that of capillary glucose measurements.

Clinical studies with fluoxetine in obesity.

Fluoxetine is a highly specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor. In studies that used a dose of 60 mg once daily, fluoxetine-treated patients consistently had greater weight loss than placebo-treated patients. In six double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 6-8 wk duration, mean weight changes on fluoxetine were approximately 0.5 kg/wk. Longer term studies have shown maximum mean weight loss to occur at 12-20 wk of therapy. Studies have consistently shown improvements in indices of glycemic control as well as weight loss in obese diabetic patients. Safety analysis has been performed on data from 3491 obese patients in controlled clinical trials of up to 52 wk duration. Adverse events with an incidence of greater than 5%, which were reported significantly more frequently by fluoxetine-treated patients, were headache, asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, somnolence, insomnia, nervousness, sweating, and tremor. Fluoxetine is effective, well tolerated, and safe in the treatment of obesity and obese diabetics.