Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage.

BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation allows men with threatened fertility to preserve their progenitive potential, but there is little data on long-term outcomes of elective sperm cryostorage programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Over 22 years, 930 men sought semen cryostorage in a single academic hospital, of which 833 (90%) had spermatozoa cryostored. Among 692 (74%) men surviving their illness, sperm samples were discarded for 193 (21% of all applicants, 28% of survivors) and cryostored spermatozoa were used for 64 men (7% of all applicants, 9% of survivors) in 85 treatment cycles commencing at a median of 36 months post-storage (range 12-180 months) with nearly 90% of usage started within 10 years of storage and none after 15 years. Pregnancy was most efficiently produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (median three cycles) compared with conventional IVF (median eight cycles) or artificial insemination (median more than six cycles; P < 0.05). A total of 141 (15%) of men had died and of these, 120 (85% of those dying) had their spermatozoa discarded; requests to prolong cryostorage were received from relatives of 21 men (2% of all applicants, 15% of deceased) of which three cases had spermatozoa transferred for use with no pregnancies reported. Sperm concentration was lower for all cryostorage groups compared with healthy sperm donor controls (P < 0.05). Following orchidectomy, men with testicular cancer had sperm density approximately half that of all other groups of men seeking cryostorage (P < 0.05), the lowering attributable to removal of one testis rather than in defects in spermatogenesis. CONCLUSION: Elective sperm cryopreservation is an effective, if sparsely used, form of fertility insurance for men whose fertility is threatened by medical treatment and is an essential part of any comprehensive cancer care programme.

Oestradiol improves arterial endothelial function in healthy men receiving testosterone.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the effects of low dose oestradiol on arterial endothelial and smooth muscle function in healthy men. Oestrogen use is associated with reduced cardiovascular disease in oestrogen-deficient women, however, the vascular effects of low-dose oestradiol in healthy men have not been investigated previously. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Twenty-three men (aged 32 +/- 8 years) were randomized to receive depot implants of testosterone (T) alone (group 1, n = 10), or T with either 10 mg (group 2, n = 7) or 20 mg (group 3, n = 6) of oestradiol (E). MEASUREMENTS: Hormone levels, lipids and vascular reactivity were measured before, 1 month and 6 months after hormone implantation. Using high-resolution ultrasound, brachial artery diameter was measured at rest, during reactive hyperaemia (leading to flow-mediated dilatation, FMD, which is endothelium-dependent) and after sublingual nitroglycerin (GTN, an endothelium-independent dilator). RESULTS: Oestradiol produced a dose-dependent increase in plasma oestradiol (at 1 month 96 +/- 7, 149 +/- 6, 192 +/- 23 pmol/l in the 3 groups, respectively, P < 0.001 by ANOVA for trend). Minor side-effects (gynaecomastia, nipple tenderness) indicated that 20 mg oestradiol was the maximum tolerated dose. There was also a dose-dependent increase in FMD with oestradiol dose: at 1 month, - 0.2, + 0.2 and + 1.8% for groups 1-3, respectively (P = 0.31 by ANOVA for trend); and at 6 months, - 0.8, + 0.4 and + 2.2% (P = 0.02). The rise in oestradiol levels following treatment correlated with the improvement in FMD (P = 0.01). GTN responses were similar in the 3 groups throughout the study. CONCLUSION: In healthy young men, oestradiol supplementation is associated with enhanced arterial endothelial function, a key marker of vascular health.

Oestradiol enhances testosterone-induced suppression of human spermatogenesis.

The aim of this study was to determine for the first time in humans, the efficacy of adding a low dose oestradiol to a suboptimally suppressive testosterone dose in a depot hormonal regimen to suppress spermatogenesis in healthy eugonadal men. Twenty-six healthy men were randomized into groups that were treated by a single subdermal implantation of either 600 mg testosterone alone (T; n = 11) or together with 10 mg (TE10, n = 7) or 20 mg (TE20, n = 8) oestradiol. Administration of oestradiol produced a dose-dependent increase in peak plasma oestradiol at 1 month and prolonged suppression of plasma LH and FSH leading to significantly enhanced suppression of sperm output. Despite the augmented spermatogenic suppression, there was no significant difference in the proportions achieving azoospermia (6/26, 23%) or severe oligozoospermia (<1 or <3 x 10(6) spermatozoa per ml, 7/26, 27%) and overall these proportions were inadequate to provide reliable contraception according to the standards identified in World Health Organization male contraceptive efficacy studies. Total and free testosterone remained within the eugonadal reference range for young men throughout the study. While the lower oestradiol dosage had minimal spermatogenic suppression effects, the higher dose produced dose-limiting adverse effects of androgen deficiency and/or oestrogen excess between the fourth and sixth month of the study. This appeared to be due to the unexpectedly prolonged, low concentration of oestradiol release from the oestradiol implants. There were no significant treatment-related changes in body composition, lipids, prostate-specific antigen, haematological or biochemical variables. Thus oestradiol has a low therapeutic window and dose-limiting side-effects at dosages that fail to achieve the uniform azoospermia required of an effective male hormonal contraceptive regimen.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nandrolone esters in oil vehicle: effects of ester, injection site and injection volume.

We studied healthy men who underwent blood sampling for plasma nandrolone, testosterone and inhibin measurements before and for 32 days after a single i.m. injection of 100 mg of nandrolone ester in arachis oil. Twenty-three men were randomized into groups receiving nandrolone phenylpropionate (group 1, n = 7) or nandrolone decanoate (group 2, n = 6) injected into the gluteal muscle in 4 ml of arachis oil vehicle or nandrolone decanoate in 1 ml of arachis oil vehicle injected into either the gluteal (group 3, n = 5) or deltoid (group 4, n = 5) muscles. Plasma nandrolone, testosterone and inhibin concentrations were analyzed by a mixed-effects indirect response model. Plasma nandrolone concentrations were influenced (P < .001) by different esters and injection sites, with higher and earlier peaks with the phenylpropionate ester, compared with the decanoate ester. After nandrolone decanoate injection, the highest bioavailability and peak nandrolone levels were observed with the 1-ml gluteal injection. Plasma testosterone concentrations were also influenced (P < .001) by the ester and injection site, with the most rapid, but briefest, suppression being due to the phenylpropionate ester, whereas the most sustained suppression was achieved with the 1-ml gluteal injection. Plasma inhibin concentrations were also significantly influenced by injection volume and site, with the lowest nadir occurring after the nandrolone decanoate 1-ml gluteal injection. Thus, the bioavailability and physiological effects of a nandrolone ester in an oil vehicle are greatest when the ester is injected in a small (1 ml vs. 4 ml) volume and into the gluteal vs. deltoid muscle. We conclude that the side-chain ester and the injection site and volume influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nandrolone esters in an oil vehicle in men.