Vulnerable Patients' Psychosocial Experiences in a Group-Based, Integrative Pain Management Program.

Objectives: To use a psychosocial framework to examine the pain experiences of low-income, ethnically diverse patients before and after an Integrative Pain Management Program (IPMP). Design and methods: IPMP is a 12-week, multimodal pain group incorporating mindfulness, acupuncture, massage, education, movement, and health coaching. The authors conducted semistructured interviews at the beginning, end, and 3 months following completion of IPMP. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed and analyzed using inductive coding methods. Setting: A primary care clinic in San Francisco, CA, serving low-income, ethnically diverse patients, many of whom are marginally housed and living with disabilities. Subjects: Forty-one patients with a diagnosis of chronic pain, currently receiving prescription opioids and referred by their primary care provider, who participated in IPMP. Results: Authors thematically analyzed 104 individual interviews with 41 IPMP participants, including 41 baseline, 35 three-month follow-up, and 28 six-month follow-up. Before IPMP, participants described a psychologic "vicious cycle" of pain symptoms that worsened with movement and anxiety, while increasing their sense of disempowerment and social isolation. Following IPMP, patients reported using new strategies to manage pain, including lowering medication use, resulting in an emerging sense of psychologic resilience, and more social connections. Conclusions: IPMP offers an accessible model for addressing psychosocial aspects of chronic pain. Vulnerable patients engaged with integrative medicine groups and developed new perspectives and tools for managing their pain; they emerged feeling hopeful and resilient. These results support the use of integrative medicine groups for targeting psychosocial aspects of chronic pain within primary care.

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Integrative Pain Management Program in a Primary Care Safety-Net Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive Integrative Pain Management Program (IPMP) for patients with chronic pain in a safety-net primary care clinic. DESIGN: We used a quality improvement "Plan Do Study Act" (PDSA) framework to design, refine, and evaluate an integrative chronic pain program. SETTING: An urban federally qualified health center located in a community with high rates of chronic pain, substance use, and opioid overdose. SUBJECTS: Eligible participants included individuals with pain for greater than 3 months who were prescribed opioid therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: We designed IPMP using a PDSA framework that promotes continuous evaluation and adaptation of the program to meet the needs of the clinical system. We assessed feasibility and acceptability with program referrals and attendance and evaluated program satisfaction. RESULTS: The IPMP delivered a 12-week group-based intervention that involved group support, education on pain etiology and treatments, movement-based interventions, mindfulness-based therapies, acupuncture, and massage therapy. One hundred forty-six patients were referred to IPMP; 58 individuals participated in one of the first three cohorts of the program. Sixty-two percent of participants attended at least half of the sessions. Staff and participants reported high levels of satisfaction with IPMP and demand for longitudinal services. CONCLUSIONS: An IPMP delivered within a safety-net primary care clinic could be implemented in a way feasible and acceptable to staff and participants with the support of the local health care system. The application of a PDSA cycle allowed for rigorous implementation and evaluation of a multimodal pain program. Quality improvement frameworks are a strategy to improve and expand the delivery of high-quality patient-centered integrative pain treatments.

Effect of provider status on preventive screening among Korean-American women in Alameda County, California.

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that having a doctor of the same ethnicity may be associated with lower rates of breast and cervical cancer screening in some Asian-American women. This study analyzes the effect of having a Korean, non-Korean, or no regular doctor upon several measures of screening among Korean-American women. METHODS: A random sample of 339 Korean-American women in Alameda County, California, were surveyed by telephone. Contingency tables and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between provider status and six measures of recent screening, controlling for insurance and demographics. RESULTS: Having a non-Korean doctor was associated with an increased likelihood of having a Pap smear (odds ratio = 2.19, 95% confidence interval = 1.00, 4.80), mammogram (odds ratio = 7.63, 95% confidence interval = 2.35, 24.84), and clinical breast examination (odds ratio = 3.76, 95% confidence interval = 1.54, 9.20) in the past 2 years, compared to having a Korean doctor. This relationship is less apparent for nonfemale specific screening tests like cholesterol exams and routine checkups. CONCLUSIONS: Women who have a Korean doctor have less than optimal rates of breast and cervical cancer screening compared to women who have a non-Korean doctor. Having a Korean doctor may indicate less access to preventive health services, and programs to increase screening should target both Korean physicians and their female patients.