ABSTRACT
Non-invasive loco-regional electro-hyperthermia (EHT) plus alkylating chemotherapy is occasionally used as salvage treatment in the relapse of patients with high-grade gliomas. Experimental data and retrospective studies suggest potential effects. However, no prospective clinical results are available. We performed a single-center prospective non-controlled single-arm Phase I trial. Main inclusion criteria were recurrent high-grade glioma WHO Grade III or IV, age 18-70, and Karnofsky performance score > or = 70. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with the combined regimen. Groups of 3 or 4 patients were treated 2-5 times a week in a dose-escalation scheme with EHT. Alkylating chemotherapy (ACNU, nimustin) was administered at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on day 1 of 42 days for up to six cycles or until tumor progression (PD) or DLT occurred. Fifteen patients with high-grade gliomas were included. Relevant toxicities were local pain and increased focal neurological signs or intracranial pressure. No DLT occurred. In some patients, the administration of mannitol during EHT or long-term use of corticosteroids was necessary to resolve symptoms. Although some patients showed responses in their primarily treated sites, the pattern of response was not well defined. EHT plus alkylating chemotherapy is tolerable in patients with relapse of high-grade gliomas. Episodes of intracranial pressure were, at least, possibly attributed to EHT but did not cause DLTs. A Phase II trial targeting treatment effects is warranted on the basis of the results raised in this trial.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Glioma/therapy , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of patients with malignant glioma achieve complete response (CR) after first-line combined modality treatment. Although these patients will invariably suffer from tumor recurrence, they usually do not receive any further treatment to maintain remission. According to in vitro and in vivo clinical studies, 13-cis retinoic acid (cRA) may be a promising agent for maintenance therapy in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We initiated a clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of high-dose cRA as maintenance therapy in patients with high-grade glioma in complete remission after first-line multimodal treatment. METHODS: A prospective single-arm phase-II study in patients with CR after combined first-line therapy (neurosurgery, radio- and chemotherapy) was performed. Patients were treated with cRA at 60 mg/m2 BS from day 1 to 21 in four-weekly cycles with a dose escalation of up to 100 mg/m2 BS until tumor recurrence. Clinical controls were performed every 4 weeks, magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (10, grade IV; 13, grade III) were evaluable using an intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment was well tolerated for up to 149 weeks with moderate dermatological symptoms in all patients. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Median time to progression was 41 weeks, median overall survival 74 weeks after inclusion in the protocol. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need for strategies maintaining remission in patients with malignant glioma. Maintenance therapy with high-dose cRA is feasible and well tolerated over long periods of time. A controlled clinical trial to test the efficacy of cRA as a maintenance treatment in malignant glioma is warranted.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glioma/drug therapy , Isotretinoin/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Adult , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Feasibility Studies , Female , Glioma/pathology , Glioma/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Survival after first-line therapy is poor for patients with glioblastoma. The role of second-line treatment for recurrent disease is controversial. The authors studied the outcome in a subset of patients with glioblastoma who were selected for an aggressive reintervention strategy at the time of progression. Their objectives were to improve patients' overall survival with sustained quality of life and to make comparisons with overall survival in unselected patients. METHODS: Overall, 168 patients were eligible for retrospective analysis. Ninety patients received specific therapy for disease recurrence (reintervention group) by specific criteria. RESULTS: In the reintervention group, promising median overall survival (mOS) results after diagnosis (61.5 weeks) and progression (33 weeks) were obtained. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months and the overall survival rate were superior in the reintervention group (71% at 12 months and 32% at 24 months) compared with the total cohort (45% and 20%, respectively) and the standard group (15% and 5%, respectively). A matched-pair analysis (n = 46 in each group), with an mOS period of 65.5 versus 28.5 weeks, confirmed these data. Quality of life was stable or slightly improved during reinterventions in a subset of patients treated within clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in the current series were treated with a reintervention strategy, which had an impact on PFS and mOS. A second resection, focal radiotherapy (in selected cases), and additional chemotherapeutic regimens should be considered for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
