The cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist AM 251 and antagonist AM 4113 produce similar effects on the behavioral satiety sequence in rats.

Cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists such as rimonabant and AM 251 hold therapeutic promise as appetite suppressants, but the extent to which non-motivational factors contribute to their anorectic effects is not fully known. Examination of the behavioral satiety sequence (BSS) in rats, the orderly progression from eating to post-prandial grooming and then resting, has revealed that these compounds preserve the order of events but differ markedly from natural satiation. The most notable difference is that grooming (particularly scratching) is profoundly enhanced at anorectic doses, while eating and resting are diminished, raising the possibility that the anorectic effect is simply secondary to the grooming effect. In the current design, the neutral CB1 antagonist AM 4113, which has been found to lack some of the undesirable effects of AM 251, produced nearly identical effects on the BSS as AM 251. The possibility that competition from enhanced grooming could account for the anorectic effect of AM 4113 was examined by yoking the pattern of disruptions caused by grooming in the AM 4113-treated group to forced locomotion in a different group fed in a modified running wheel. This response competition did not significantly reduce food intake. It was concluded that AM 4113, a CB1 neutral antagonist, produces the same effects on the BSS as AM 251, but that response competition from enhanced grooming may not be a sufficient explanation for the anorectic effects of CB1 antagonists/inverse agonists.

Suppression of food intake and food-reinforced behavior produced by the novel CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM 1387.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonists are becoming increasingly recognized for their potential therapeutic utility as appetite suppressants. In the current paper we characterize the biochemical and behavioral effects of AM 1387, which is a novel CB1 antagonist. AM 1387 exhibited binding affinity and selectivity for the CB1 over the CB2 receptor. Moreover, AM 1387 decreased GTPgammaS (EC50: 22.82 nM) and increased forskolin-stimulated cAMP (EC50: 274.6 nM), as did the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 (GTPgammaS EC50: 25.82 nM; cAMP EC50: 363.8 nM), indicating that AM1387 also has inverse agonist properties in vitro. In the behavioral characterization in rats, AM 1387 suppressed lever pressing for food on two operant schedules (fixed-ratio 1 and 5). Timecourse of the effect on fixed-ratio 5 responding was then determined, and the half-life (t1/2=4.87 h) was found to be threefold shorter than what has been shown for SR 141716A, and fourfold shorter than AM 251. Finally, AM 1387 was found to suppress food intake using three diets of differing macronutrient composition and palatability. It was concluded that AM 1387 may be a useful tool for examining the effects of CB1 receptor antagonism or inverse agonism on food intake.

Dopamine agonists suppress cholinomimetic-induced tremulous jaw movements in an animal model of Parkinsonism: tremorolytic effects of pergolide, ropinirole and CY 208-243.

Considerable evidence indicates that cholinomimetic-induced tremulous jaw movements in rats share many characteristics with human Parkinsonian tremor, and several antiparkinsonian drugs suppress cholinomimetic-induced tremulous jaw movements. The present study investigated three different types of dopamine agonists, which have known antiparkinsonian characteristics, for their ability to suppress the tremulous jaw movements induced by tacrine (5.0 mg/kg). The non-selective dopamine agonist pergolide, a widely used antiparkinsonian drug, was highly potent at suppressing tacrine-induced jaw movements (e.g. 0.125-1.0 mg/kg). The selective D2 agonist ropinirole, which also is used clinically as an antiparkinsonian drug, suppressed jaw movements in the dose range of 2.5-20.0 mg/kg. The D1 agonist CY 208-243, which has been reported to suppress tremor, also reduced jaw movement activity (4.0 mg/kg). Across several studies, the rank order of potency for suppressing cholinomimetic-induced jaw movements in rats is related to the potency for producing antiparkinsonian effects in humans. Together with previous studies, the present results suggest that cholinomimetic-induced jaw movements in rats can be used to characterize dopaminergic antiparkinsonian agents and to investigate the basal ganglia circuits involved in the generation of tremulous movements.

Local injections of the 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist mianserin into substantia nigra pars reticulata block tremulous jaw movements in rats: studies with a putative model of Parkinsonian tremor.

RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine and olanzapine have a low liability for producing motor side effects. In addition to being D2 antagonists, these drugs have a complex binding profile that includes affinity for muscarinic, alpha, H1, and various serotonin receptors. Previous work in rats has shown that atypical antipsychotics suppress tremulous jaw movements induced by the anticholinesterase tacrine in rats. Cholinomimetic-induced jaw movements are a putative model of parkinsonian tremor, and the ability of antipsychotic drugs to suppress these movements in rats is correlated with motor side-effect liability in humans. OBJECTIVE: The present work was undertaken to study the role of central serotonin receptors in the generation of cholinomimetic-induced jaw movements. RESULTS: Systemic injections of the serotonin antagonist mianserin suppressed tacrine-induced jaw movements, with an ED(50) of 2.77 mg/kg. Local injections of mianserin directly into substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) also suppressed tacrine-induced jaw movements. Injections into ventrolateral neostriatum, or a control site dorsal to SNr, failed to have any effects on jaw movement activity. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that atypical antipsychotics may act both on striatal muscarinic receptors and nigral serotonin receptors to suppress jaw movement activity. It is possible that the unique motor properties of atypical antipsychotics result from actions on multiple receptors in several brain areas. The precise serotonin receptor subtype involved in these effects is unknown, and future work will examine the effects of drugs that act selectively on 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors.