Vascular endothelial growth factor and dexamethasone release from nonfouling sensor coatings affect the foreign body response.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and dexamethasone (DX) release from hydrogel coatings were examined as a means to modify tissue inflammation and induce angiogenesis. Antibiofouling hydrogels for implantable glucose sensor coatings were prepared from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, and polyethylene glycol. Microdialysis sampling was used to test the effect of the hydrogel coating on glucose recovery. VEGF-releasing hydrogel-coated fibers increased vascularity and inflammation in the surrounding tissue after 2 weeks of implantation compared to hydrogel-coated fibers. DX-releasing hydrogel-coated fibers reduced inflammation compared to hydrogel-coated fibers and had reduced capsule vascularity compared to VEGF-releasing hydrogel-coated fibers. Hydrogels that released both VEGF and DX simultaneously also showed reduced inflammation at 2 weeks implantation; however, no enhanced vessel formation was observed indicating that the DX diminished the VEGF effect. At 6 weeks, there were no detectable differences between drug-releasing hydrogel-coated fibers and control fibers. From this study, hydrogel drug release affected initial events of the foreign body response with DX inhibiting VEGF, but once the drug depot was exhausted these effects disappeared.

Urea as a recovery marker for quantitative assessment of tumor interstitial solutes with microdialysis.

Microdialysis is a technique that enables measurement of extracellular concentrations of unbound analytes. A small probe with a semipermeable membrane is implanted in tissue and constantly perfused. Small analytes in the interstitial fluid diffuse into the perfusate and are collected. Often, microdialysate concentrations of an analyte are only a fraction of the unbound concentrations in the extracellular space attributable to incomplete equilibration between these two compartments. Thus, it is necessary to determine the degree of equilibration between microdialysate and interstitium for each probe to accurately estimate concentrations. In this study, we investigated tissue urea as a solute to continually correct for nonequilibrium conditions. We used this method, along with relative diffusivities of urea and glucose, to monitor glucose levels before and during hyperglycemia as an example of how this method can be applied. No-net-flux experiments were performed on 10 anesthetized female rats with mammary adenocarcinomas. Microdialysis probes 1 cm in length with a molecular weight cutoff of M(r) 100,000 were used. Urea was added to the perfusate in concentrations of 0.83, 2.5, 5.0, and 13.33 mM. Microdialysate samples were collected every 15 min. For each rat, there was a linear relationship between the net urea concentration (outflow-inflow) and the urea concentration in the perfusate (inflow). Net flux should equal zero when perfusate and interstitial concentrations are equal. In an additional series of 13 rats, microdialysate samples were obtained before, during, and after administration of glucose at a dose of 1 g/kg. The interstitial tumor urea concentration was 7.8 +/- 0.3 mM compared with 6.2+/- 0.3 mM in plasma. There was a significant linear relationship between plasma urea (measured directly) and tumor urea (microdialysis measurement). Plasma urea concentrations were constant over time in all of the experiments, including those where hyperglycemia was induced. Hyperglycemia caused 7.7- and 3.6-fold increases in tumor and plasma glucose, respectively. There was no effect of hyperglycemia on tumor blood flow. Urea appears to be a useful low molecular weight relative recovery marker for tumor microdialysis. In combination with the determination of relative diffusivity between urea and the solute of interest, this calibration method may allow for quantitative measurements of tumor metabolites and unbound drugs.