Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Emerg Nurs ; 46(4): 505-510, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32115235

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: ED pain score reassessment and documentation rates were drastically low according to sampled data from the St. Margaret Hospital Emergency Department, leading to difficult pain management encounters for clinicians. The purpose of this project was to improve pain score reassessment rates in ED patients who were discharged with extremity pain. METHODS: This project was an 8-month, pre-postinterventional (preintervention: September-November 2018, intervention: December 2018-January 2019, and postintervention: February-April 2019) quality improvement project that took place in a community hospital emergency department. Emergency nurses participated in 6 focus groups, allowing for the creation of focus group-themed interventions at the request of the nursing staff. Daily audits of pain reassessment and documentation rates for individual nurses took place during the month of January 2019. In addition, a weekly newsletter was created and reported the ED pain reassessment and documentation rates. RESULTS: All patient encounters (581) were reviewed over the 8-month period. Baseline pain score reassessment and documentation rates were 36.2% (confidence interval, 30.3%-42.3%) in the emergency department. Pain reassessment and documentation rates increased to 62.3% (confidence interval, 56.8%-67.6%) during the 3-month postintervention period. DISCUSSION: Implementing daily audits and weekly newsletters that created transparency of individual and group performances increased pain score reassessment and documentation rates.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Emergency Nursing/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Extremities , Pain Measurement/nursing , Quality Improvement , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Focus Groups , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Nursing Audit , Pain Management/standards , Periodicals as Topic
2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 226(2): 247-59, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23090624

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Nicotine (NIC) potently increases operant responding for non-NIC reinforcers, and this effect may depend on drug-mediated increases in incentive motivation. According to this hypothesis, NIC should also potently increase approach to Pavlovian-conditioned stimuli associated with rewards. OBJECTIVE: The present studies explored the effects of NIC on Pavlovian-conditioned approach responses. METHOD: To do so, liquid dippers were used to deliver an unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.1 ml sucrose) after presentation of a conditioned stimulus (CS; 30 s illumination of a stimulus light)-both the CS and US were presented in receptacles equipped to monitor head entries. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the CS and US were presented in the same receptacle, but NIC pretreatment (0.4 mg/kg base) did not increase conditioned approach responses. Delivery of the sucrose US was then shifted to receptacle in a different location. All rats learned to approach the new US location (goal-tracking) at similar rates. Approach to the CS receptacle (sign-tracking) declined for saline-pretreated rats, but NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking. In experiment 2, NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking when the CS and US were spatially separated during acquisition. In experiment 3, NIC pretreatments were replaced with saline, but the effect of NIC persisted for an additional 24 test sessions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that NIC increases incentive motivation and that this effect is long-lasting, persisting beyond the pharmacological effects of NIC.


Subject(s)
Attention/drug effects , Conditioning, Classical/drug effects , Motivation , Nicotine/pharmacology , Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacology , Animals , Goals , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reward
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...