Quality of life with pharmacological treatment in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results from the Evolution European Prospective Multicenter Multi-National Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement (LUTS/BPE) can lead to significant disturbances to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacological treatment of LUTS/BPE on disease specific and generic QOL measures. METHODS: Evolution was a European prospective, multicenter multi-national, observational registry collecting real-life clinical data over 2 years on the management of LUTS/BPE in primary and secondary care. This study investigated disease-specific QOL using questionnaires such as IPSS Q8, BPH Impact Index (BII) and generic QOL using questionnaires like EuroQOL Five Dimension (EQ5D) which encompassed EQ5D VAS and EQ5D health index. RESULTS: The registry enrolled 1838 BPE patients and 1246 patients were evaluable at the end of 24 months. Nearly 70% of patients in the study were previously treated with medical therapy and 17% of these had already discontinued medical treatment previously for various reasons with lack of efficacy being the most common. The mean time since diagnosis of LUTS in the previously treated group was 4.7 years (0-26 years). Medical management produced statistically significant improvement in QOL (disease specific and generic) in previously untreated patients and an insignificant change in generic QOL in previously treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: After 5-years from the onset of symptoms, LUTS/BPE patients previously treated with medication had significantly impaired QOL in patients in a manner comparable to other chronic diseases. Earlier intervention with minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIT) should be considered in LUTS/BPE patients that do not show a significant improvement in QOL with medical therapy.

Contemporary use of phytotherapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the EVOLUTION European registry.

BACKGROUND: To use the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAURF) registry data to determine the proportion of contemporary Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement (LUTS/BPE) patients prescribed phytotherapy, and to determine their subjective quality of life and clinical progression responses. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter multinational observational registry study, conducted over 2 years. Men ≥ 50 years seeking LUTS/BPE were divided at baseline into two cohorts, presently/recently untreated patients (PUP) commencing pharmacotherapy at baseline and presently/recently treated patients (c-PTP) continuing previously received pharmacotherapy, with 24-month follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, 2175 patients were enrolled with 1838 analyzed. Of the PUP cohort (n = 575), 92 (16%) received phytotherapy and 65 (71%, n = 65/92) completed 24-month FU, with France prescribing 34% (n = 30/89) the highest proportion of phytotherapy among all LUTS/BPE medications. In the c-PTP group (n = 1263), only 69 (5%) patients were using phytotherapy, falling to n = 35/69 (51%) at 24-month FU (highest in France 20% (n = 43/210)). Though defined disease progression occurred in ≤ 20%, with only 1% proceeding to surgical intervention, in both groups, clinically meaningful improvement was lower and symptom persistence was higher in PUP but similar in the treated (c-PTP) patients on phytotherapy compared to the other LUTS/BPE medication. CONCLUSION: Low heterogeneous prescribing rates for phytotherapy were reported in both PUP and c-PTP cohorts over the 24-month FU. Although phytotherapy led to subjective improvements, healthcare practitioners should prescribe them with caution until higher quality evidence and guideline recommendations supporting its use are available.

Medical therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE): a cost minimisation analysis.

PURPOSE: A cost minimisation analysis compares the costs of different interventions' to ascertain the least expensive over time. We compared different prostate targeted drug treatments with TURP to identify the optimal cost saving duration of a medical therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: The Evolution registry is a prospective, multicentre registry, conducted by the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAUrf) for 24 months in 5 European countries. Evolution was designed to register the management of symptomatic BPE in clinical practice settings in 5 European countries. Direct cost evaluation associated with prostate targeted medical therapies and TURP was also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: In total, 1838 men were enrolled with 1246 evaluable at 24 months. Medical therapies were more cost saving than TURP for treatment durations ranging from 2.9 to 70.4 years. Cost saving depended on both medication class and individual country assessed. Daily tamsulosin monotherapy was more cost saving than TURP for ≤ 13.9 years in Germany compared to ≤ 32.7 years in Italy. Daily finasteride monotherapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years in France compared to ≤ 36.9 years in Spain. Combination therapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years for Italian patients versus ≤ 13.8 years in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: BPE medical management was more cost saving than TURP for different specific treatment durations. Information from this study will allow clinicians to convey medical and surgical costs over time, to both patients and payors alike, when considering BPE treatment.

A randomized study comparing epirubicin in a 4-weekly versus a weekly intravenous regimen in patients with metastatic, hormone resistant, prostatic carcinoma: effects on health related quality of life.

The treatment of hormone resistant prostate cancer) with epirubicin 25 mg/m(2)(Epi25) on a weekly intravenous regimen may be better in terms of health related quality of life (HRQOL) than with 100 mg/m(2)(Epi100) on a 4-weekly regimen. A total of 79 patients who filled out the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire for the assessment of HRQOL could be evaluated. Compared with the baseline, no changes in HRQOL function scales or significant changes in the following HRQOL symptom scales were found. The Epi25 group reported less pain during the first 3 months and the Epi100 group more dyspnoea after 4 weeks and less pain and less insomnia but more loss of appetite after 8 weeks. In both groups, toxicity was comparable, except for World Health Organisation grade II-III alopecia occurring in 82% in the Epi100 versus 31% in the Epi25 group. There were no significant differences between groups in response rates and survival. In this study, HRQOL was not improved which is in line with other studies using only epirubicine. Epirubicin as single agent therapy should not be used in future treatment of patients with HRPC.

4-Year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term effects of 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in patients treated by radical prostatectomy for locally confined prostate cancer. METHODS: We report the results of 402 patients (220 with a clinical T2 tumor and 182 with a clinical T3 tumor) of whom 192 randomly received neoadjuvant total androgen deprivation using a LHRH analogue (goserelin) plus flutamide for a period of 3 months and 210 underwent radical prostatectomy only. RESULTS: 'Clinical downstaging' was seen in 30% of cases in the neoadjuvantly treated group (NEO). 'Pathological downstaging' occurred in 7 and 15% of cases in the direct radical prostatectomy (DP) group and the NEO group, respectively (p<0.01). In patients with clinical T2 as well as in patients with clinical T3 tumors, a significant difference in the number of positive margins was shown in favor of the NEO group (cT2, p<0.01; cT3, p = 0.01). This advantage, although there was a trend in favor of the NEO group, specifically in cT2 tumors, did not translate in a significantly better PSA progression rate (p = 0.18). However, when evaluating the local control rate in cT2 tumors, we observed local recurrence in 3 of 102 (3%) patients in the NEO group versus 12 of 114 (11%) patients in the DP group. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.03). In the cT3 group, this difference was not statistically significant (NEO group: 15 of 87 (17%), and DP group: 21 of 95 (22%) patients; p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical revelance of pathological downstaging and the lower percentage of patients with positive margins in the neoadjuvantly treated group with a clinical T2 tumor is not confirmed by a lower PSA progression rate. However, this study indicates that there may be a trend that this advantage in favor of the NEO group directly translates into a better local control rate in clinical T2 tumors. Better local control in cT2 tumors is only going to be of relevance if subsequently you can show that there is a better survival for these patients. Unfortunately, this article reports a study which is not yet mature enough to show relevant information. Presently, neoadjuvant therapy should not be given outside clinical research settings.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: the European experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) has been used for more than a decade for prostate cancer, but the results of clinical trials are only now becoming available, and the value of the treatment is not yet clear. The authors reviewed the results of the European randomized trials to increase our understanding of the role of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the results of 402 patients with prostate cancer (220 clinical stage T(2) and 182 clinical T(3) tumor), of whom 192 were randomly assigned to NHT using an LHRH analog (goserelin) plus flutamide for a period of 3 months (NHT) and 210 underwent radical prostatectomy only (RP). RESULTS: "Pathologic downstaging" occurred in 15% and 7% of the NHT and the RP group, respectively (P < 0.01). Fifty of the 189 patients in the NHT group (26%) and 68 of the 209 patients in the RP group (33%) developed disease progression, as determined by rising serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration. Regarding local disease progression, the advantage for the use of NHT approached but did not reach statistical significance:18 of 189 patients (10%) in the NHT group and 33 of 209 patients (16%) in the RP group (P = 0. 07). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a trend in favor of the NHT group with respect to the number of patients with PSA progression and the number with local disease progression, it did not reach statistical significance. These results may be attributable to a true lack of benefit of adjuvant hormonal ablation or to a lack of statistical power to demonstrate a difference in a subset of patients who might benefit from this therapy.

Results of a European comparative randomized study comparing oral bropirimine versus intravesical BCG treatment in BCG-naive patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. European Bropirimine Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: This European phase III clinical trial was part of an intercontinental study which was closed prematurely by the sponsor. The study was designed to compare the effects of oral bropirimine with intravesical BCG, the current standard treatment in patients with newly diagnosed bladder carcinoma in situ (CIS). METHODS: A total of 55 BCG-naive patients with bladder CIS were randomized to receive bropirimine (n = 27) or BCG (n = 28). Bropirimine was orally administered at a dose of 3 g/day for 3 consecutive days with a 4-day drug-free interval for up to 1 year. BCG-Tice instillations were administered weekly for 2 x 6 weeks. Both biopsies and cytology had to be negative for the patient to be considered a complete responder (CR). RESULTS: The percentage of dropouts for all of the adverse events was 4% for bropirimine and 14% for BCG. The most frequently reported local events in the bropirimine- versus the BCG-treated group were irritative complaints, 64 vs. 89% (p = 0.03) and hematuria, 24 vs. 61% (p < 0.01). The most frequently reported systemic events in the bropirimine- versus the BCG-treated group were fever 4 vs. 21%, flu syndrome 24 vs. 7%, headache 28 vs. 11% and nausea 24 vs. 11% (all p > 0.05). A total of 92% of the patients treated with bropirimine had a CR with a mean duration of 12.6 months (95% CI 9.2-15.9). In the BCG group, all of the patients had a CR with a mean of 12.3 months (95% CI 8.5-16.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that bropirimine, an orally administered drug that can be self-administered to outpatients with more acceptable local toxicity compared to BCG, could be an effective first-line therapy in patients with CIS of the urinary bladder. Continued investigation of bropirimine is warranted to increase its clinical utility.

Results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential intravesical therapy with mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus mitomycin C alone in patients with superficial bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We study toxicity and efficacy of sequential intravesical therapy with mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in patients with intermediate or high risk superficial bladder cancer compared to the use of intravesical mitomycin C alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with intermediate and high risk papillary superficial bladder cancer and carcinoma in situ were randomized after transurethral resection between 4 weekly instillations with 40 mg. mitomycin C followed by 6 weekly instillations with BCG (group 1, 90 patients) or 10 weekly instillations with mitomycin C (group 2, 92 patients). RESULTS: The frequency of bacterial and chemical cystitis, and other local side effects was similar in both groups. Allergic reactions, including skin rash, were more frequent in the mitomycin C only group (12 of 92 patients versus 5 of 90, p = 0.08), and other systemic side effects were more frequent in the sequential group (16 of 90 versus 8 of 92, p = 0.07). After a median followup of 32 months the number of recurrences (sequential 35 of 90 patients versus mitomycin C only 42 of 92, p = 0.36) and progression (5 of 90 versus 4 of 92 respectively, p = 0.70) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any major differences in toxicity or treatment efficacy with intravesical mitomycin C and the sequential use of BCG or mitomycin C for intermediate and high risk superficial papillary bladder cancer.

Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. European ALFIN Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the additive benefit of combining an alpha1-blocker and a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor. METHODS: This European, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involved 1.051 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients received sustained release (SR) alfuzosin (n = 358), a selective alpha1-blocker given at a dose of 5 mg twice daily without dose titration; finasteride (n = 344), 5 mg once daily, or both drugs (n = 349), for 6 months. Primary efficacy criteria were symptomatic improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score: I-PSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Symptomatic improvement was significantly higher from the 1st month of treatment with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination; mean changes in I-PSS versus baseline at end-point were -6.3 and -6.1, respectively, compared with -5.2 with finasteride alone (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.01; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.03). The percentages of patients with a decrease in I-PSS of at least 50% were 43, 42 and 33% for SR alfuzosin, the combination and finasteride, respectively (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.008; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.009). In the overall population, increases in Qmax were greater with SR alfuzosin and the combination, compared with finasteride alone after 1 month of therapy, but changes at end-point were similar in the three treatment groups. In those 47% of patients likely to be obstructed (baseline Qmax <10 ml/s), however, mean increases in Qmax were significantly higher with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination, whatever the visit. Finasteride, alone or in combination, significantly impaired sexual function. The incidence of postural symptoms was low and similar in the three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In this 6-month trial, SR alfuzosin was more effective than finasteride, with no additional benefit in combining both drugs.

Long-term follow-up of an EORTC randomized prospective trial comparing intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin-RIVM and mitomycin C in superficial bladder cancer. EORTC GU Group and the Dutch South East Cooperative Urological Group. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Collaborative Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine long-term efficacy of intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) versus bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients with superficial bladder cancer with regard to recurrences and progression. METHODS: Patients with superficial bladder cancer (pTa, pT1, pTis) were treated with intravesical MMC (30 mg, weekly for 4 weeks, and thereafter monthly for 5 months) or BCG (weekly for 6 weeks). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four patients were eligible (171 in the BCG group, 173 in the MMC group). The median follow-up was 7.2 years. Toxicity was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Efficacy of the two treatment policies was similar with regard to tumor recurrence. With regard to progression to invasive disease, MMC was more effective than BCG in patients without carcinoma in situ (CIS) (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We can confirm the conclusions of other studies that intravesical treatment with 30 mg of MMC remains an effective treatment option that can also be used in high-risk patients. Like others, we could not confirm that a 6-week course of BCG is more effective in the prevention of tumor progression. Of the 33 patients with tumor progression after intravesical therapy, 20 died of bladder cancer, confirming that tumor progression after intravesical therapy carries a poor prognosis. In this study the difference in toxicity between BCG and MMC was not significant. When comparing studies with MMC and BCG, differences in treatment schedule and/or patient selection should be kept in mind.

Transurethral resection of the prostate vs high-energy thermotherapy of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome and durability of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) in comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms were randomized and treated either by TURP (21 patients; mean prostate volume 45 mL, SD 15) or HE-TUMT (31 patients, mean prostate volume 43 mL, SD 12). Long-term results were obtained at a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.4 (0.5) years. RESULTS: During the follow-up, the mean symptomatic improvement stabilized at 56% after TUMT and 74% after TURP. The mean maximum urinary flow rate increased by 62% after TUMT and 105% after TURP. Before treatment, 78% of patients in the TURP group were obstructed according to urodynamic investigation and after treatment, 14% remained obstructed. In the TUMT group, 67% of patients were obstructed before treatment and 33% remained so afterward. Six patients (19%) underwent TURP after TUMT (four after 1 year) and two patients were also treated with medication. One patient underwent a bladder neck incision after TURP to treat bladder neck sclerosis. Three patients were not satisfied with the outcome after the additional TURP. CONCLUSION: Both treatment modalities show good symptomatic and objective results at > 2 years of follow-up. Most re-treatments were performed > or = 1 year after treatment and were based on subjective findings.

Relationships between lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction: results from the ICS-"BPH" study.

Despite the lack of evidence in the literature for close relationships between lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction, the majority of urologists rely on symptomatology when selecting patients for prostatic surgery. We investigated the relationships between a wide range of lower urinary tract symptoms from the ICSmale questionnaire and the results of urodynamic pressure and flow studies. We evaluated 933 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive for bladder outlet obstruction from 12 countries who participated in the ICS-"BPH" study with the ICSmale questionnaire and urodynamic pressure and flow studies. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were obtained between symptoms and measures of bladder outlet obstruction. There was little or no correlation between a wide range of symptoms and the results of free uroflowmetry and pressure and flow studies. From symptoms alone, it is not possible to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction. Pressure and flow studies and symptom profiles measure different aspects of the clinical condition that should be viewed separately in the evaluation and treatment decision of the patient presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Computerized artifact detection and correction of uroflow curves: towards a more consistent quantitative assessment of maximum flow.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a computerized method of artifact detection and correction of uroflow and compare the quantitative assessment of maximum flow obtained by the computer with visual correction by experts. METHODS: A total of 90 randomly chosen flows was scanned into the computer whereafter automated artifact detection and correction was performed according to pre-established rules implemented in the software. Three experts visually corrected the flows using the same artifact detection and correction specifications as the computer. Measuring agreement between different methods of assessment of maximum flow was evaluated by calculating the difference and the standard deviation (SD) of the differences. The repeatability of assessing the maximum flow value by the computer and by expert 1 was assessed by calculating the difference between 2 readings and the coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability of maximum flow after detection and correction of artifacts by the computer (0.38 ml/s) was slightly better when compared with the coefficient of repeatability between 2 observations by 1 expert (1.12 ml/s). The interobserver variation for the quantitative assessment of maximum flow appeared to be great. A total of 51% of the maximum flow values assessed by expert 2 was 1 ml/s or more greater than those assessed by expert 1. When comparing the results of the computer with those of the experts, the mean value of maximum flow from expert 1 was 0.71 ml/s smaller than the computer value (p < 0.01), the mean value from expert 2 was 0.53 ml/s greater (p < 0.01) and the mean value from expert 3 was not significantly different (0.25 ml/s greater). The SD of maximum flow after correction by the computer was 0.3 ml/s smaller than the SD of the raw data from the flowmeter and the corrected values by 2 experts. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized artifact detection and correction eliminates an important fraction of the variability of manually corrected maximum flow values. This may lead to smaller sample size requirements, especially in studies where the primary objective is to assess a small (+/- 1 ml/s) difference in mean maximum flow between groups.

Comparison of tamsulosin with alfuzosin in the treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia). The European Tamsulosin Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the alpha 1 A-subtype selective drug tamsulosin with the nonsubtype-selective agent alfuzosin in the treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), often termed symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 256 patients with benign prostatic enlargement and LUTS suggestive of BOO (symptomatic BPH) who received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily or alfuzosin 2.5 mg three times daily during 12 weeks of treatment. The response was assessed by measurements of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), a symptom score (Boyarsky) and blood pressure at regular intervals. RESULTS: Tamsulosin and alfuzosin produced comparable improvements in Qmax and total Boyarsky symptom score. Both treatments were well tolerated with respect to adverse events. Tamsulosin had no statistically significant effect on blood pressure compared with baseline but alfuzosin induced a significant reduction in both standing and supine blood pressure, compared with baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin is the first adrenoceptor antagonist that is selective for the alpha 1 A-subtype; this specificity may explain its lack of effect on blood pressure compared with alfuzosin, an agent that is not receptor subtype specific. Moreover, this finding may partly explain why tamsulosin, in contrast to other currently available alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, can be administered without dose titration. Another advantage compared with alfuzosin (and prazosin) is the once-daily dosing regimen of tamsulosin.

Quantitative assessment of uroflow: is there a circadian rhythm?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the circadian rhythm of urinary flow values varies within groups of patients with varying degrees of bladder outlet obstruction. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction used a home-based uroflowmeter and produced a total of 1670 correctly measured flows at home. These patients also underwent a screening program with free urinary flowmetry in the hospital and a urodynamic pressure and flow study. RESULTS: There is a circadian variability in urinary flow values in men with higher grades of obstruction. These men have a higher peak urinary flow with a smaller voided volume and thus a shorter flow time in the early afternoon when compared with late evening, early morning, and the midnight to morning periods. CONCLUSIONS: This significantly greater maximum flow in the afternoon in men with higher grades of obstruction can be an important bias in studies where the primary end point is to assess a small improvement in maximum flow. Therefore, the circadian rhythm of uroflow has to be taken into account in the evaluation of the efficacy of treatment. Patients participating in clinical research studies should produce their urinary flow in the clinic always during the same time period, either in the morning or in the afternoon, and should not switch their appointment time.

High energy thermotherapy versus transurethral resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective randomized study with 1 year of followup.

PURPOSE: We compared the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate and high energy microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 52 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia 21 (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 69.6 +/- 8.5 years) were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate and 31 (mean age 69.3 +/- 5.9 years) were treated with high energy microwave thermotherapy. Patients were assessed using the Madsen symptom score, measurements of voiding parameters, transrectal ultrasound and cystometry, including pressure-flow analyses. Examinations were repeated at fixed intervals for up to 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: After transurethral resection and thermotherapy there was significant improvement in all clinical parameters. At 1 year of followup symptomatic improvement was 78% in the transurethral resection group versus 68% in the thermotherapy group, with improvements in free flow rate of 100 and 69%, respectively. Both groups had significant relief of bladder outlet symptoms. No serious complications occurred in either group, while 1 patient in each group required repeat treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory results were obtained after both treatments, with improvements following high energy microwave thermotherapy being in the same range as those after transurethral resection of the prostate.

The correlation between prostate volume, transition zone volume, transition zone index and clinical and urodynamic investigations in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), measurement of the transition zone (TZ) of the prostate by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and the ratio between the TZ volume and total prostate volume (TZ index) correlates better with clinical and urodynamic investigations than total prostate volume alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 150 consecutive patients with LUTS underwent a standardized screening programme including the International Prostate Symptom Sore (IPSS), a physical examination, TRUS of the prostate and urodynamic investigations with pressure-flow studies. The total prostate volume and TZ volume were assessed from TRUS using the ellipsoid formula. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated between different prostate volume measurements and specific symptomatic and urodynamic variables. RESULTS: The relationships between specific IPSS symptoms, symptom scores and the prostate volume measurements were not statistically significant except for one domain, nocturia, that appeared to be statistically significantly correlated with the TZ index (r = 0.25). The correlations for free flow, pressure-flow variables and prostate volume measurements were stronger, but only moderate at best. The highest correlations were between TZ volume and the linear passive urethral resistance obstruction category, urethral resistance factor and detrusor pressure at maximum flow (r = 0.43, 0.44 and 0.40, respectively). The differences between the correlations of prostate volume and TZ index and these variables were small (r = 0.39, 0.38 and 0.37, respectively for prostate volume and r = 0.38, 0.40 and 0.33 respectively for TZ index). CONCLUSIONS: There were very small differences between the correlations of total prostate volume, TZ volume and TZ index, and clinical and pressure-flow variables. In the assessment of the last two, the estimation of the total prostate volume by TRUS was a reasonable way to obtain the required information about prostate size and measuring TZ volume and calculating TZ index was of limited additional value. Symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction were mainly determined by other factors than the prostate and, specifically, TZ volume. As earlier studies have indicated that including pressure-flow data in the pre-operative evaluation and selection of patients for interventional therapies may improve the overall clinical results, we think that prostate volume, TZ volume or symptoms alone should not be used as the main indication for deciding on the appropriate invasive treatment options.

Urodynamic and clinical effects of noninvasive and minimally invasive treatments in elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms stratified according to the grade of obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the symptomatic and urodynamic effects of several noninvasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities to quantify these effects and to compare subjective and objective results within groups with various degrees of obstruction. METHODS: In a prospective study at one center, 487 patients who completed a full screening program including urodynamic investigation started treatment with watchful waiting, terazosin, transurethral microwave thermotherapy, or laser treatment of the prostate; they were re-evaluated symptomatically and urodynamically after 6 months of therapy. The symptomatic and urodynamic results of 87 patients from another center who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate and who had their second urodynamic evaluation 6 months after surgery were also included. RESULTS: In patients without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), improvement in maximum flow and symptom scores with little change in the degree of obstruction was most apparent, whereas a decrease of detrusor pressure at maximum flow was observed mainly in patients with BOO. The urodynamic effect but not the symptomatic effect of treatments depended on the initial grade of BOO. Urodynamic changes were more marked in the minimally invasive treatment groups compared with the noninvasive treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, symptomatic improvement in the short term does not seem to depend on changes in urodynamic parameters. Future well-controlled studies focusing on the durability of symptomatic and urodynamic effects will be needed to illustrate the relative potential of urodynamic and other clinical parameters to predict a favorable response to current and innovative treatments.

The International Continence Society "Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia" Study: international differences in lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother.

PURPOSE: We investigated the international differences in the reporting of lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother in patients with symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate international differences in the reporting of lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother in 1,271 patients from 12 countries who participated in the International Continence Society "benign prostatic hyperplasia" study. RESULTS: Country of origin was significantly associated with the prevalence of a large number of lower urinary tract symptoms (10 of 20), even after adjusting for potentially confounding variables, including physical and socio-demographic factors. Country of origin was also significantly associated with the reporting of bother but for a much smaller number of symptoms (2). CONCLUSIONS: In different countries lower urinary tract symptoms may be reported to different extents. Therefore, the results of studies in particular countries may not be generally applicable to other countries. It is likely that symptom scores will conceal this variation, necessitating consideration of individual symptoms (as in the International Continence Society "benign prostatic hyperplasia" study) or the development of country specific scoring systems. An alternative would be to focus on bother, which appeared to be much less sensitive to international differences.

Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study comparing radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy associated with neoadjuvant hormonal combination therapy in T2-3 N0 M0 prostatic carcinoma. The European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in locally confined prostate cancer. METHODS: We report the preliminary results of 354 patients (199 with a clinical T2 tumor and 155 with a clinical T3 tumor) of whom 164 randomly received neoadjuvant total androgen deprivation using a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog (goserelin) plus flutamide for a period of 3 months. RESULTS: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and prostatic volume decreased from a mean of 19.9 ng/mL and 37.7 cm3 to a mean of 0.8 ng/mL and 26.5 cm3 after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy. "Clinical down-staging" was seen in 32% in the neoadjuvantly treated group. "Pathological downstaging" percentages were 6% and 16% in the direct radical prostatectomy group and neoadjuvantly-treated group, respectively (P < 0.01). In patients with clinical T2 tumors, a significant difference in number of positive margins was shown in favor of the neoadjuvantly treated group (P < 0.01). In patients with clinical T3 tumors, a significant difference could not be detected (P = 0.14). In 215 patients with a mean follow-up time of 15 months, the calculated 95% confidence intervals of mean time of PSA progression-free survival were 26 to 35 months in the neoadjuvantly-treated group and 28 to 37 months in the direct radical prostatectomy group, indicating no significant differences between treatment groups. However, follow-up time is currently too short to draw definite conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: These early data confirm high understaging percentages in clinical staging. The clinical relevance of the statistically significant smaller numbers of patients with positive margins in the neoadjuvantly treated group with a clinical T2 tumor will have to be confirmed when further follow-up allows an accurate evaluation of time to PSA progression, local recurrence, and distant metastases. Presently, neoadjuvant therapy is not advisable outside clinical research settings.