Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
6.
MedEdPORTAL ; 18: 11271, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36157358

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a complication of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for infertility. Given the potential for significant morbidity, it is important for emergency medicine (EM) residents to be able to recognize and initiate treatment for this disorder. Methods: A high-fidelity human patient simulator was used, with availability of bedside ultrasound. PGY 1-4 EM residents participated in this case of a 28-year-old female patient undergoing treatment for infertility who presented to the emergency department with shortness of breath and near syncope. Workup revealed a diagnosis of OHSS. After the simulation, we surveyed residents on their knowledge of OHSS prior to participation in the simulation. We also asked about their confidence in caring for a patient with OHSS pre- and postsimulation based on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 24 EM residents completed this simulation case. Prior to participating in the simulation experience, 62% of residents reported that they had heard of OHSS, and 17% of residents had previously managed a patient with OHSS. After participating in the simulation, residents' comfort with managing a patient with OHSS increased from 1.7 to 3.7 points (1 = not at all comfortable, 5 = extremely comfortable; p < .001). Discussion: OHSS is a rare but important complication of ART that many EM residents have not treated in the clinical environment. As the presenting symptoms may mimic other diagnoses, obtaining a detailed history and utilizing bedside ultrasonography are essential to diagnosing and correctly treating these patients.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Infertility , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Infertility/complications , Infertility/therapy , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/diagnosis , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/therapy , Ultrasonography
8.
J Emerg Med ; 62(4): 575-578, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063317

ABSTRACT

Dr. Patrick Lowe: Our case today is that of a 47-year-old woman who was referred to our emergency department (ED) due to bloody urine, dark tarry stools, red spots on her skin, and bruising throughout her body. Fourteen days prior to presentation, she began exhibiting intermittent fevers, headache, shortness of breath, and a dry cough, and she tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 pneumonia). Over the 3 days prior to her ED presentation, she experienced a headache that was more intense than the headaches she had been having in the preceding 2 weeks. She reported episodes of both dark urine as well as bright red blood in her urine. In addition, she had multiple dark stools described as tar-like when asked. On the day of her ED presentation, the patient noted a red rash throughout her body. In addition, earlier in the day, she had atraumatic self-limited epistaxis. She denied any falls or head strikes, vision changes, focal weakness or numbness, shortness of breath, chest pain, abdominal pain, or peripheral swelling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complications , Cough , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Headache , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
9.
MedEdPORTAL ; 17: 11151, 2021 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948486

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Medical students are positioned to observe, document, and explore opportunities to improve patient safety and quality in their institutions. Medical schools are introducing quality improvement (QI) knowledge and skills in the preclinical classrooms, yet few provide opportunities to apply these tools in the clinical setting. Methods: Clerkship students participated in two 1-hour sessions, organized in groups of 12-15 students, led by faculty with QI expertise. The sessions in the module introduced core concepts in QI and patient safety, while drawing on students' own clinical experiences. Students identified a system failure they encountered in their own clinical setting/practice and analyzed contributing factors using the 5 Whys Tool. We evaluated the efficacy of the two-session module with a pre- and postsurvey of students' self-reported change in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Surveys also assessed students' satisfaction with module content and format. Faculty perspectives were solicited by email. Results: In April-May 2019, 59 students at a large US medical school participated. Of students, 73% and 53% completed pre- and postsurveys, respectively. All students submitted a report of an identified systems failure and their analysis of contributing factors. Students' self-rated knowledge and skills increased significantly. Students preferred active engagement compared to passive learning. Students and faculty identified areas for future module improvement. Discussion: The educational program was well received and increased students' knowledge and confidence in core concepts of QI and safety. The module addressed the requirement for graduating students to identify safety incidents and contribute to a culture of QI.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Curriculum , Humans , Problem-Based Learning , Quality Improvement
10.
J Emerg Med ; 59(6): 931-934, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972787
11.
J Emerg Med ; 59(3): 435-438, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800638
13.
J Emerg Med ; 59(2): 294-297, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359915
14.
Acad Med ; 95(11): 1687-1695, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134787

ABSTRACT

As the U.S. health care system changes and technology alters how doctors work and learn, medical schools and their faculty are compelled to modify their curricula and teaching methods. In this article, educational leaders and key faculty describe how the Pathways curriculum was conceived, designed, and implemented at Harvard Medical School. Faculty were committed to the principle that educators should focus on how students learn and their ability to apply what they learn in the evaluation and care of patients. Using the best evidence from the cognitive sciences about adult learning, they made major changes in the pedagogical approach employed in the classroom and clinic. The curriculum was built upon 4 foundational principles: to enhance critical thinking and provide developmentally appropriate content; to ensure both horizontal integration between courses and vertical integration between phases of the curriculum; to engage learners, foster curiosity, and reinforce the importance of student ownership and responsibility for their learning; and to support students' transformation to a professional dedicated to the care of their patients and to their obligations for lifelong, self-directed learning.The practice of medicine is rapidly evolving and will undoubtedly change in multiple ways over the career of a physician. By emphasizing personal responsibility, professionalism, and thinking skills over content transfer, the authors believe this curriculum will prepare students not only for the first day of practice but also for an uncertain future in the biological sciences, health and disease, and the nation's health care system, which they will encounter in the decades to come.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Problem-Based Learning , Stakeholder Participation , Thinking , Educational Measurement , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Needs Assessment , Teaching
17.
West J Emerg Med ; 16(6): 810-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26594271

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Morbidity and mortality conferences (M+M) are a traditional part of residency training and mandated by the Accreditation Counsel of Graduate Medical Education. This study's objective was to determine the goals, structure, and the prevalence of practices that foster strong safety cultures in the M+Ms of U.S. emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. METHODS: The authors conducted a national survey of U.S. EM residency program directors. The survey instrument evaluated five domains of M+M (Organization and Infrastructure; Case Finding; Case Selection; Presentation; and Follow up) based on the validated Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Safety Culture survey. RESULTS: There was an 80% (151/188) response rate. The primary objectives of M+M were discussing adverse outcomes (53/151, 35%), identifying systems errors (47/151, 31%) and identifying cognitive errors (26/151, 17%). Fifty-six percent (84/151) of institutions have anonymous case submission, with 10% (15/151) maintaining complete anonymity during the presentation and 21% (31/151) maintaining partial anonymity. Forty-seven percent (71/151) of programs report a formal process to follow up on systems issues identified at M+M. Forty-four percent (67/151) of programs report regular debriefing with residents who have had their cases presented. CONCLUSION: The structure and goals of M+Ms in EM residencies vary widely. Many programs lack features of M+M that promote a non-punitive response to error, such as anonymity. Other programs lack features that support strong safety cultures, such as following up on systems issues or reporting back to residents on improvements. Further research is warranted to determine if M+M structure is related to patient safety culture in residency programs.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Emergency Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Organizational Culture , Safety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
18.
J Emerg Med ; 43(1): 134-8, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human Patient Simulation (HPS) is increasingly used in medical education, but its role in Emergency Medicine (EM) residency education is uncertain. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of HPS when fully integrated into an EM residency didactic curriculum. METHODS: The study design was a cross-sectional survey performed in 2006, 2 years after the implementation of an integrated simulation curriculum. Fifty-four residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-4) of a 4-year EM residency were surveyed with demographic and curricular questions on the perceived value of simulation relative to other teaching formats. Survey items were rated on a bipolar linear numeric scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree), with 5 being neutral. Data were analyzed using Student t-tests. RESULTS: Forty residents responded to the survey (74% response rate). The perceived effectiveness of HPS was higher for junior residents than senior residents (8.0 vs. 6.2, respectively, p<0.001). There were no differences in perceived effectiveness of lectures (7.8 vs. 7.9, respectively, p=0.1), morbidity and mortality conference (8.5 vs. 8.7, respectively, p=0.3), and trauma conference (8.4 vs. 8.8, respectively, p=0.2) between junior and senior residents. Scores for perceptions of improvement in residency training (knowledge acquisition and clinical decision-making) after the integration of HPS into the curriculum were positive for all residents. CONCLUSION: Residents' perceptions of HPS integration into an EM residency curriculum are positive for both improving knowledge acquisition and learning clinical decision-making. HPS was rated as more effective during junior years than senior years, while the perceived efficacy of more traditional educational modalities remained constant throughout residency training.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Emergency Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Patient Simulation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Data Collection , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Learning , Male
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 198(5): 523.e1-6, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18191797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of emergency department (ED) visits for vaginal bleeding during early pregnancy (VBEP). STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1993-2003. Cases presented with a complaint of vaginal bleeding and had diagnoses consistent with presentation during early pregnancy. RESULTS: Over the 11-year period, there were 5.4 million visits for VBEP, which represents 1.6% of all ED visits or almost 500,000 visits/year. ED visits for VBEP increased from 5.6-7.8 visits per 1000 US population (P for trend < .01). The population rates were highest in the 20-29 year age group. ED patients with VBEP were more likely to be black, Hispanic, and uninsured, as compared to women presenting for other reasons. CONCLUSION: ED visits for VBEP are rising, particularly among younger and Hispanic women. Programs that ensure primary obstetric care would help decrease reliance on the ED for this important condition.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Uterine Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Black People , Female , Health Surveys , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Medically Uninsured , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Hemorrhage/ethnology , White People
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...