Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ERJ Open Res ; 9(2)2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36891066

ABSTRACT

In patients with community-acquired pneumonia, LCA can identify robust prognostic subgroups based on clinical and inflammatory parameters. Yet, these subgroups have not proven robust in predicting response to adjunctive dexamethasone treatment. https://bit.ly/3O5eaxz.

2.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 46(11): 2000-2005, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35982120

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A fixed 6 mg dexamethasone dose for 10 days is the standard treatment for all hospitalised COVID-19 patients who require supplemental oxygen. Yet, the pharmacokinetic properties of dexamethasone can lead to diminishing systemic dexamethasone exposure with increasing body mass index (BMI). The present study examines whether this translates to overweight and obesity being associated with worse clinical outcomes, defined as ICU admission or in hospital death, in COVID-19 patients treated with fixed-dose dexamethasone. METHODS: We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study in COVID-19 patients who were admitted to a non-ICU ward and were treated with dexamethasone (6 mg once daily for a maximum of ten days) between June 2020 and January 2021. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between BMI-categories and an unfavourable clinical course (ICU admission and/or in hospital death). Analyses were adjusted for age, comorbidities, inflammatory status, and oxygen requirement at admission. For reference, similar analyses were repeated in a cohort of patients hospitalised before dexamethasone was introduced (March 2020 through May 2020). RESULTS: In patients treated with dexamethasone (n = 385) an unfavourable clinical course was most prevalent in patients with normal weight (BMI < 25) compared to patients with overweight (BMI 25-30) and patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) with percentages of 33, 26 and 21% respectively. In multivariable analyses, there was no association between BMI-category and an unfavourable clinical course (respectively with aORs of 0.81 (0.43-1.53) and 0.61 (0.30-1.27) with normal weight as reference). In the reference cohort (n = 249) the opposite was observed with an unfavourable clinical course being most prevalent in patients with overweight (39% vs 28%; aOR 2.17 (0.99-4.76)). In both cohorts, CRP level at admission was higher and lymphocyte count was lower in patients with normal weight compared to patients with obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obesity are not associated with an unfavourable clinical course in COVID-19 patients admitted to a non-ICU ward and treated with 6 mg dexamethasone once daily.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Overweight , Humans , Overweight/complications , Overweight/drug therapy , Overweight/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Hospital Mortality , Retrospective Studies , Obesity/complications , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Oxygen
3.
ERJ Open Res ; 8(1)2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35036417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Latent class analysis (LCA) has identified subgroups with meaningful treatment implications in acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed a secondary analysis of three studies to assess whether LCA can identify clinically distinct subgroups in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and whether the treatment effect of adjunctive corticosteroids differs between subgroups. METHODS: LCA was performed on baseline clinical and biomarker data from the Ovidius trial (n=304) and the Steroids in Pneumonia (STEP) trial (n=727), both randomised controlled trials investigating adjunctive corticosteroid treatment in CAP, and the observational TripleP cohort (n=201). Analyses were conducted independently in two cohorts (Ovidius-TripleP combined and the STEP trial). In both cohorts, differences in clinical outcomes and response to adjunctive corticosteroid treatment were examined between subgroups identified through LCA. RESULTS: A two-class model fitted both cohorts best. Class 2 patients had more signs of systemic inflammation compared to class 1. In both cohorts, length of stay was longer and in-hospital mortality rate was higher in class 2. In the Ovidius trial, corticosteroids reduced the median length of stay in class 2 (6.5 versus 9.5 days) but not in class 1 (p-value for interaction=0.02). In the STEP trial, there was no significant interaction for length of stay. We found no significant interaction between class assignment and adjunctive corticosteroid treatment for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In two independent cohorts, LCA identified two classes of CAP patients with different clinical characteristics and outcomes. Given the different response to adjunctive corticosteroids in the Ovidius trial, LCA might provide a useful basis to improve patient selection for future trials.

4.
Eur J Intern Med ; 96: 102-108, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34782191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesised that community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with more severe disease or inflammation might benefit more from adjunctive corticosteroid treatment. Neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with inflammation and disease severity in CAP. We investigated the interaction between these parameters and adjunctive dexamethasone effects on clinical outcomes in CAP. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the randomised placebo-controlled Santeon-CAP trial (n = 401), which showed a positive effect of adjunctive oral dexamethasone on length of stay (LOS) in CAP patients. White blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, NLR (highest tertile vs. lowest two tertiles) and lymphocyte count (lowest tertile vs. highest two tertiles) were examined as potential effect modifiers of treatment with dexamethasone on LOS (primary outcome) and ICU-admission, 30-day mortality and hospital readmission. RESULTS: WBC differential counts were available for 354 patients. The effect of dexamethasone on LOS was more pronounced in high WBC count, high neutrophil count or high NLR subgroups (difference in median LOS of 2 days versus zero days in the reference subgroups, p for interaction < 0.05). There was no effect modification for the other outcomes. Patients with low WBC and low neutrophil counts did not benefit from dexamethasone, while hospital readmission rate was higher in those treated with dexamethasone (6% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS: WBC count and/or neutrophil might be easily available biomarkers to guide selection of CAP patients who are more likely to benefit from adjunctive dexamethasone treatment. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm this predictive potential.


Subject(s)
Neutrophils , Pneumonia , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Lymphocytes , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
5.
Eur Respir J ; 58(2)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adjunctive intravenous corticosteroid treatment has been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS) in adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to assess the effect of oral dexamethasone on LOS and whether this effect is disease severity dependent. METHODS: In this multicentre, stratified randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, immunocompetent adults with CAP were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive oral dexamethasone (6 mg once daily) or placebo for 4 days in four teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Randomisation (blocks of four) was stratified by CAP severity (pneumonia severity index class I-III and IV-V). The primary outcome was LOS. RESULTS: Between December 2012 and November 2018, 401 patients were randomised to receive dexamethasone (n=203) or placebo (n=198). Median LOS was shorter in the dexamethasone group (4.5 days, 95% CI 4.0-5.0 days) than in the placebo group (5.0 days, 95% CI 4.6-5.4 days; p=0.033). Within both CAP severity subgroups, differences in LOS between treatment groups were not statistically significant. The secondary ICU admission rate was lower in the dexamethasone arm (5 (3%) versus 14 (7%); p=0.030); 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. In the dexamethasone group the rate of hospital readmission tended to be higher (20 (10%) versus 9 (5%); p=0.051) and hyperglycaemia (14 (7%) versus 1 (1%); p=0.001) was more prevalent. CONCLUSION: Oral dexamethasone reduced LOS and ICU admission rate in adults hospitalised with CAP. It remains unclear for which patients the risk-benefit ratio is optimal.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Pneumonia , Adult , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Dexamethasone , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Length of Stay , Pneumonia/drug therapy
6.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(7): 1359-1366, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025133

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the extent of microbiological testing and the frequency of antibiotic alteration in adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We retrospectively studied 283 immunocompetent patients hospitalised with CAP. Information on microbiological testing and prescribed antibiotics was obtained. Patients were grouped according to the number of different microbiological tests performed within the first 2 days of admission (0-5 tests). Alteration rates were compared between these groups. Antimicrobial alteration was defined as a switch at day 3 of hospital stay to (1) a narrower spectrum antibiotics, or (2) a different class of antibiotics, or (3) a switch from dual therapy to monotherapy (4) or discontinuation of antibiotic treatment because the indication for antibiotic treatment did no longer exist. For each additional test performed, a stepwise increase in percentage of patients with altered antibiotic regimen ranging from 0 to 59% (p = 0.001) was found. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that performing PCR assay for atypical pathogens was most strongly associated with any alteration of antibiotic treatment (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.4-4.9)) and with changes in atypical coverage specifically (OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.6-6.0). The extent of microbiological testing was positively associated with antibiotic alteration in adults hospitalised with CAP. Antibiotic treatment was most likely to be altered in patients in whom PCR assay for atypical pathogens was performed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Viruses/isolation & purification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunocompetence , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Pneumonia (Nathan) ; 10: 15, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30603378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Utilization of diagnostics and biomarkers are the second largest cost drivers in the management of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The present study aimed to systematically assess the inter-hospital variation in these cost drivers in relation to antibiotic use in CAP. METHODS: Detailed resource utilization data from 300 patients who participated in a multicenter placebo-controlled trial investigating dexamethasone as adjunctive treatment for community-acquired pneumonia was grouped into 3 categories: clinical chemistry testing, radiological exams, and microbiological testing. Based on the identified top 5 items per category, average costs were calculated per category and per hospital. Antibiotic de-escalation at day 3 and secondary ICU admission were assessed as outcomes for proportionality of diagnostics use. RESULTS: The mean costs for diagnostics varied between hospitals from 350 (SD 31) to 841 (SD 37) euro per patient (p < 0.001). This difference was primarily explained by variation in costs for microbiological testing (mean 195 vs. 726 euro per patient, p < 0.001). There was no difference in number of secondary ICU admissions but there was an inverse association between the costs of microbiological testing and level of antibiotic de-escalation. De-escalation occurred most frequently in the hospital with the lowest cost for microbiological testing (48% vs. 30%; p = 0.018). The latter hospital had an automated physician alert system in place to consider a timely iv-to-oral switch of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Large inter-hospital variation exists in resource utilization, mainly in microbiological diagnostics in the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A counterintuitive inverse association between the magnitude of these costs and the amount of antibiotic de-escalation was found. Future studies about the optimal cost-effective set of microbiological testing for antimicrobial stewardship in pneumonia patients should acknowledge the interaction between testing, way of communication of results and triggered physician alert systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01743755.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...