Total Fertilization Failure: A Single Center Analysis.

Our main objective was to identify the male and female parameters associated with total fertilization failure (TFF) in IVF with nonmasculine indications. The present work, IRB equivalent INS 63209, is a case-control study that evaluated all cases with TFF after conventional IVF at the Center for Human Reproduction from January 2010 to December 2019 (n = 154). As a control group, we analyzed all patients who did not experience fertilization failure after conventional IVF in the same period (n = 475). We evaluated various parameters, both male and female, assessed during infertility treatment, and only cases without masculine etiology (normal seminal parameters) were included. Ages (female and male) were not different between the groups. Moreover, AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), semen volume, preprocessing concentration and preprocessing motility were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the number of collected oocytes (study versus control groups, median [25-75 interquartile]: 2 [1-5] and 5 [3-8]); MII (2 [1-4] and 5 [2-7]); and postprocessing motility (85 [70-90] and 90 [80-95]) were significantly different between both groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis including all significant data demonstrated that the number of collected oocytes was significantly related to IVF failure. Patients with fewer than 5 oocytes had an OR of - 1.37 (- 0.938 to - 1.827) for TFF after conventional IVF. Our results showed that a lower follicular response to controlled ovarian stimulation, evidenced by a decreased number of collected oocytes, was the most important parameter associated with IVF failure in nonmasculine infertility.

Evaluation of BOX-PCR and REP-PCR as Molecular Typing Tools for Antarctic Streptomyces.

Molecular studies led to the resurgence of natural products research from genus Streptomyces, already known for their long history and importance for the pharmaceutical industry. However, species belonging to this genus are difficult to identify and the most commonly used techniques, which are based on 16S rRNA sequencing, do not discriminate between related species. In this work, amplification profiles generated from BOX-PCR and REP-PCR of 49 Antarctic soil streptomycetes were compared to evaluate the diversity present in the group and to characterize the bacterial isolates, along with some 16S rRNA amplifications. The BOX-A1R primer exhibit clearer amplification fragments, different from the amplification patterns obtained using the REP 1R and 2R primers. A higher diversity was observed with REP-PCR amplifications, even though a larger number of fragments was obtained with BOX-A1R primer amplifications. There are at least four isolates that showed great similarity (about 90%) in both techniques. In other hand, there are two others that are 90% similar in BOX-PCR, but distant in REP-PCR, showing only 40% of similarity. Results of the combination of BOX-PCR and REP-PCR represent a simple and low-cost method to discriminate between Streptomyces strains. There is no species identification with only the 16S rRNA, most isolates seem to be related to S. globisporus. Further studies added to the obtained results may provide better data to help the characterization of these microorganisms.