Transdermal Buprenorphine Relieves Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and stable glycemic control who had been experiencing moderate to severe DPNP for at least 6 months on maximal tolerated conventional therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive buprenorphine (5 µg/h) or placebo patches. The dose was titrated to effect to a maximum of 40 µg/h. Paracetamol was available as rescue analgesia. The severity of pain and other symptoms of DPNP were assessed daily in a patient diary and at clinic visits. RESULTS: One hundred eight-six patients were enrolled, with 93 randomized to either buprenorphine or placebo. A high proportion of patients did not complete the study (buprenorphine 37 of 93, placebo 24 of 93). The main reason for premature withdrawal in the buprenorphine group was adverse events commonly due to untreated nausea and/or vomiting. Among the per-protocol population, more patients in the buprenorphine group (86.3%) experienced a 30% reduction in average versus baseline pain at week 12 than those in the placebo group (56.6%, P < 0.001). A nonsignificant trend favored the buprenorphine group within the intention-to-treat analysis of the same end point (51.7% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.175). CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal buprenorphine, when tolerated, is an effective therapy for DPNP and provides another option to manage this challenging painful condition. Nausea and constipation need to be managed proactively to optimize treatment outcomes.

Effect of immunosuppression for primary renal disease on the risk of cancer in subsequent renal transplantation: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To measure the risk of cancer in renal transplantation for recipients who had previously been treated with immunosuppressive agents for primary renal disease. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study of 5970 renal transplant recipients in Australia registered on the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry between 1982 and 1997 and followed until 2007. Data about the incidence of a range of cancer types from this Registry were compared with cancer incidence data for the general population matched for cancer type, year of incidence, age, and gender derived from national cancer records. Outcome measures for each cancer group with or without pretransplantation immunosuppression were cancer-specific standardized incidence ratios and a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) standardized to 1. RESULTS: For those treated with pretransplantation immunosuppression, the risks for four cancer groups during renal transplantation were significantly increased: anogenital cancer (HR, 3.13; confidence interval [CI], 1.92-5.11; P<0.0001), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (HR, 2.37; CI, 1.53-3.68; P=0.0001), breast cancer (HR, 2.52; CI, 1.13-5.61; P=0.024), and urinary tract cancer (excluding kidney) (HR, 1.84; CI, 1.13-3.01; P=0.015). However, the risks of cancer in the oral cavity and pharynx, kidney, thyroid, colon, leukemia, lung, melanoma, prostate, and stomach were not significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplantation immunosuppression for primary renal disease increases the risks of four cancer types in renal transplantation while sparing the others. Patients in whom this treatment is being considered should be informed of these risks.

Impact of inhaled corticosteroids on cortisol suppression in adults with asthma: a quantitative review.

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on cortisol suppression show inconsistent results, and there is uncertainty regarding the dose-response relationship between ICSs and cortisol suppression. OBJECTIVE: To determine, using meta-analysis, the extent of cortisol suppression after administration of clinically relevant ICS doses in adults with asthma. METHODS: Database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library) using appropriate indexed terms were performed to identify eligible articles for review. Articles reporting the effects of ICSs on cortisol levels in asthmatic adults, measured using the cumulative serum or plasma cortisol, morning serum or plasma cortisol, or cumulative overnight urinary free cortisol method, were identified. All available cortisol measurements were extracted. Cortisol suppression was estimated, and treatment arms were grouped into low-, medium-, and high-dose ranges according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. A multivariate model was used to determine relationships between ICS dose and cortisol suppression and to explore sources of heterogeneity among trials. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies providing information on 216 measures of cortisol suppression were included in this meta-analysis. Cortisol suppression in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups were estimated to be 17.92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.08%-24.77%), 26.55% (95% CI, 17.29%-35.80%), and 36.31% (95% CI, 26.48%-46.13%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant cortisol suppression was evident at low doses of ICSs and increased with dose. These results support an impact of all ICSs on endogenous cortisol levels and underscore the importance of titrating ICS doses to the minimum required to maintain symptom control.

Public funding of bosentan for the treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension in Australia: cost effectiveness and risk sharing.

OBJECTIVES: In Australia, no therapeutic agents were subsidised for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension (iPAH), a rare progressive and severe disease with short life expectancy, until 1 March 2004, when bosentan (a dual endothelin receptor antagonist of high cost) was listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Bosentan, in addition to conventional therapy, has been shown to slow iPAH progression and improve clinical and haemodynamic status and symptomatology, compared with placebo and conventional therapy. The objective of this paper is to describe the process of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing for bosentan (Tracleer), which included a health economic model assessing the cost effectiveness of bosentan from a healthcare payer perspective, and a risk-sharing arrangement based on the establishment of a patient registry. METHODS: The health economic model predicted the cost, hospitalisation and mortality rates of a population of iPAH patients treated with either the conventional therapy regimen used in Australia or bosentan plus the conventional therapy regimen. The model was implemented as a first-order Monte Carlo simulation with mortality modelled directly as the main clinical outcome. The impacts of proposed continuation criteria, restricting the ongoing use of the drug, were evaluated. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 5% and a sensitivity analysis examined the robustness of the key assumptions. RESULTS: The model predicted that after 5, 10 and 15 years, the difference in average cumulative costs between bosentan plus conventional therapy and conventional therapy alone would be 116,929 Australian dollars (A dollars), A181,808 dollars and A216,331 dollars for each patient, respectively. There would be an associated increase in average life expectancy of 1.39, 2.93 and 3.87 years at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 15 years of A55,927 dollars for each life-year gained. Removing the continuation criteria from the model increased the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to A62,267 dollars (1996-2002 values). CONCLUSIONS: Economic modelling based on improved survival suggests bosentan to be a potentially cost-effective treatment for iPAH. However, the structure of the model and its inputs should be reviewed and updated as more data become available.

Assessment of the bioequivalence of a generic cyclosporine A by a randomized controlled trial in stable renal recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the bioequivalence of Cysporin, a generic cyclosporine A, compared with Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Study design consisted of an open label, two-way crossover, randomized controlled trial of Cysporin versus Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients. In all, 33 patients were enrolled; 31 were randomized and 28 were evaluable. AUCs(0-12) were done on day 14 and 28; C(0) and C(2) were done on days 0, 7, 21 and 35. Dose conversion was 1:1. Outcome measures for serum cyclosporin A concentrations expressed as the mean+/-SD were AUC(0-12) (microg x hr/L), C(max) (microg/L), C(2) (microg/L), T(max) (hr) and T(1/2) (hr). Mean and 90% CI of the ratio Cysporin/Neoral of log-transformed data were calculated using a general linear model. RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic features were: AUC(0-12): Cysporin 3495+/-1319, Neoral 3853+/-1378 (P<0.05); C(max): Cysporin 755+/-301, Neoral 881+/-368 (P<0.05); C(2): Cysporin 613+/-235, Neoral 672+/-255 (P>0.05); T(max): Cysporin 1.9+/-0.8, Neoral 1.4+/-0.6 (P<0.005); and T1/2: Cysporin 8.8+/-4.3, Neoral 8.7+/-6.2 (P>0.05). Estimated ratios of Cysporin/Neoral were: AUC 0.93 (90% CI 0.88-0.98; P<0.05); C(max) 0.88 (90% CI 0.80-0.97; P<0.05); and T(max) 1.32 (90% CI 1.14-1.53; P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Both the extent and rate of absorption of Cysporin are significantly less than those of Neoral. The 90% CI for the ratios of Cysporin/Neoral for AUC and C(max) lie within 0.80-1.25. Hence in this clinical context Cysporin is pharmacologically bioequivalent with Neoral. This study illustrates the importance of testing bioequivalence of generic cyclosporine A products in transplant recipients not healthy volunteers.

The relationship between quality of life, Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects the cognitive function and capacity for independent living of the elderly, however little is known about the measurement of patient's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its relationship to these effects. We examined the relationship between patient/caregiver-rated HRQoL and cognition (using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)) or Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). One hundred AD patients participating in an open-label trial of donepezil were followed for 6 months. Cognition and function were assessed using the MMSE (clinician-rated) and IADL scale (caregiver-rated). Patient QoL, as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) scale, was rated separately by patients and their primary caregivers. Mean patient-rated AQoL was 0.60, whilst caregiver-rated AQoL was 0.50. Patient and caregiver AQoL assessments correlated (r = 0.37, P = 0.0038) for all levels of disease severity. Patient-rated AQoL scores ranged from 0.52 for patients with severe AD, to 0.71 for patients with mild AD. Caregiver-rated AQoL scores ranged from 0.40 to 0.59. There were approximately linear relationships between the AQoL and MMSE scores (patient-rated r = 0.30, P < 0.0001; caregiver-rated r = 0.28, P < 0.0001), and AQoL and IADL scores (patient-rated r = 0.36, P < 0.0001; caregiver-rated r = 0.43, P < 0.0001). Patient self-assessment of AQoL is a useful instrument for measuring HRQoL in AD that displays an approximately linear relationship with MMSE, IADL, and caregiver-rated AQoL.

CHART: congestive cardiac failure in hospitals, an Australian review of treatment.

Despite strong evidence supporting the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACED, beta-blockers, and spironolactone in heart failure, evidence suggests these drugs are under-used and under-dosed. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of hospitalisation on heart failure pharmacotherapy in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). A retrospective study was conducted, based on 300 consecutive admissions with the medical record diagnosis of heart failure, in each of seven grade one teaching hospitals. At admission, 49.5% of patients were treated with ACEI, 19.2% with beta-blockers and 8.1% with spironolactone. Twenty-six per cent of untreated patients started ACEI treatment during their hospital stay, and 9.4% started beta-blockers The main determinants of treatment with ACEI at discharge were a primary diagnosis of heart failure (odds ratio (OR) = 1.886) and the presence of a potential contraindication (high creatinine OR = 0.458, cough OR = 0.187, renal artery stenosis OR = 0.309). Patients were less likely to be discharged on beta-blockers if greater than 85 years of age (OR = 0.545), or there was mention of airways disease (OR = 0.347), asthma (OR = 0.238) or type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.721) on the medical record. Patients admitted by a cardiologist were more likely to be discharged on beta-blockers (OR = 3.207). Spironolactone was more likely used in patients with primary diagnosis of heart failure (OR = 1.549), aged less than 85 years (OR = 0.319), and/or admitted by a cardiologist (OR = 1.827). The substantial number of patients admitted to hospital with a secondary diagnosis of heart failure should be targeted for therapeutic optimisation.